0 Members and 39 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: CliveG on 28/10/2019 04:16:05No. Just a comment as to my increased perception of the harm being done to me.Perception being the important word.There is no evidence of actual harm caused, is there?Quote from: CliveG on 28/10/2019 05:04:45I felt stomach cramps and wondered what I had eaten. What you had eaten was almost certainly "no tramadol".
No. Just a comment as to my increased perception of the harm being done to me.
I felt stomach cramps and wondered what I had eaten.
Let us say that we did the following. I stand on your bare feet with a pair of hobnailed boots and then step back. You say "Every time you step on my feet I have pain which lessens when you step back." Could I say "You can only prove the pain is from the boots if you do a double blind test." Maybe my closeness has a psychological effect on you that translates to a referred pains in your feet. You cannot just make such simple statements of cause and effect if you want scientists and the courts to believe you. Or are there exceptions deemed fairly simple?
Tramadol is a Schedule IV controlled substance, meaning it has some abuse potential
When she spends time in the house she complains that it feels like there is grit in her eyes. It is a symptom that I have experienced a couple of times before we shielded the house.
"Upmarket food": I heard a doctor explaining to an upmarket cruise passenger that the reason he got the same malaria as a backpacker was that the mosquito did not know how much he had paid to be there. My last bout of violent stomach upset was caused by a very expensive oyster. Short haul flying involves rapid changes of air pressure. The painful effects are exacerbated by almost any medication or illness. It makes no difference whether the cabin is pressurised (usually to 8000 ft equivalent) or not (for flights below 10,000 ft it isn't mandatory) because it is the last 8000 ft of descent that really hurts.QuoteTramadol is a Schedule IV controlled substance, meaning it has some abuse potential In short, it is psychoactive and addictive. QuoteWhen she spends time in the house she complains that it feels like there is grit in her eyes. It is a symptom that I have experienced a couple of times before we shielded the house. That suggests that shielding the house has not improved matters and may even have made them worse. Sounds like a chemical problem.
Quote from: CliveG on 28/10/2019 10:27:20Let us say that we did the following. I stand on your bare feet with a pair of hobnailed boots and then step back. You say "Every time you step on my feet I have pain which lessens when you step back." Could I say "You can only prove the pain is from the boots if you do a double blind test." Maybe my closeness has a psychological effect on you that translates to a referred pains in your feet. You cannot just make such simple statements of cause and effect if you want scientists and the courts to believe you. Or are there exceptions deemed fairly simple?Cause and effect with hobnail boots on bare feet is an easy one to prove to a jury because of common experience. A double blind test (of sorts) is easy to set up if you are blindfolded, wear ear defenders and press a button to indicate foot pain, an independent observer records when the boots walk over you, although you might want to add foam rubber feet at random or other materials.Alan understands expert witness evidence more than I do, but my limited experience tells me that jurors are generally nontechnical, the word ‘radiation’ often conjures up images of harm, they also will have read press reports that there have been concerns raised about proximity of phone handsets to brain/ear. The general public rarely understand scientific evidence and tend to go with fear eg vaccines, they also tend to suspect big companies and governments of trying to hide the truth - which is out there. So if you can get a jury based on a cross-section of population to make a judgment, and you play on fear, common knowledge, etc I think there is a good chance they would find in your favour (whether or not there is scientific evidence). A panel of judges is more likely to be swayed by the experts and would certainly understand the significance of a double blind test.If you can devise a serious double blind test, eg in a university lab where levels could be controlled, I would go for it.
Tramadol is a codeine derivative known for its weakness.
Do you not think that pain is an indication of harm being done to one's body?
Could I say "You can only prove the pain is from the boots if you do a double blind test."
I have done a lot of short haul and very long haul flights. I have never had medical issues
The emotional tension in one's body builds up and manifests as muscle pain.
Quote from: CliveG on 28/10/2019 10:08:35 Tramadol is a codeine derivative known for its weakness. Wrong on both counts (and since you keep banging on about your field of expertise, I'm going to point out that I'm a pharmaceutical chemist).And, if you don't want to believe me, try WIKI (and loc cit)."In most cases, tramadol withdrawal will set in 12–20 hours after the last dose, but this can vary.[31] Tramadol withdrawal typically lasts longer than that of other opioids. Seven days or more of acute withdrawal symptoms can occur as opposed to typically 3 or 4 days for other codeine analogues."Fromhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tramadol#Dependence_and_withdrawalSeriously, a dose of the runs from Tramadol withdrawal is about as predictable as getting drunk if you drink a bottle of wine.No need for speculation about dodgy prawns or upmarket pizza,
I stopped and tried CBD but that also make me feel strange despite only about 3 drops.
Quote from: CliveG on 28/10/2019 19:02:08I have done a lot of short haul and very long haul flights. I have never had medical issues This makes you a real exception. Every aviator recognises recompression pain as being part of the job, and a descent without discomfort is a rarity. It's still the best office chair in the world, though.(snip)
Quote from: CliveG on 28/10/2019 10:27:20Do you not think that pain is an indication of harm being done to one's body?(snip)Do you understand that pain may be caused by things other than physical harm?Are you, for example, aware of pepper?(snip)
All opioids screw up the digestive system, often causing painful constipation or localised cramps. The relief can be spectacular. Patients referred to the London Royal Homeopathic Hospital with long-term multiple medications were often simply put on "no meds" for 24 or 48 hours. Their recovery from multiple symptoms made it a lot easier to diagnose what actually needed treating.
Quote from: CliveG on 29/10/2019 09:09:54I stopped and tried CBD but that also make me feel strange despite only about 3 drops.Thanks for the confirmation that you are susceptible to psychosomatic effects.
I had one young girl who went so deep she was capable of doing psychic stuff. Reading minds even at a distance, remote viewing and telling the near future. I stopped because it got too spooky for us all.
You should know that. How much of an allergen does it take to cause severe problems?
That sensitivity is likely why I am sensitive to EMFs.
Although my wife now seems sensitized.
Can long term low background tower radiation sensitize most of the population?
I think so.
However, you are right that some pain can be in the mind.
Sympathy with the pot sensitivity. AFAIK my only allergy is to marijuana - serious swelling of lips, tongue and throat, just from secondary inhalation. I could get a job as a police dog - though not for long! Gitanes were a lot safer. I can recall every note I played in the Sixties, but the other guys can't even remember the name of the band.A second language is enormously helpful. My aunt and uncle lived in France in their fifties. She had a stroke around 70 when living in the USA and apparently lost all speech and comprehension until he spoke to her in French. A second (learned rather than acquired) language seems to reside in a different part of the brain. Not sure how language is affected in genuinely bilingual-from-birth people, which would be an interesting study. As would the effect of stroke on speech in left-handers.