0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
G(units) = Uo(units) = Meters^2 per coulomb second
The electrical model gives us a lot of interesting information.
In my opinion my work is a theory.
HYPOTHESIS: a supposition or proposed explanation made on the basis of limited evidence
Science seems to be ducking 'further investigation'
Science seems to be ducking 'further investigation' in favour of vociferous, baseless, criticism.
I can measure G and U.They have different values.Also I can use them in equations and only one of them works.If I try to set up a satellite using your wrong value for G it crashes.If I try to design a capacitor using your wrong value for U it won't do what I want.
Bored Chemist says:Do you not understand that?If a hypothesis leads to a prediction which is wrong, you must reject the hypothesis.GG: I am BSEE(summa cum laude) from Brooklyn Polytechnic. All my regular calculations are per standard equations. I use the conversion equations to provide me with an electrical model of the universe. This model is either the truth or the best electrical equivalent model of the universe. In this way it helps me to understand how the universe works. All the equations I use to calculate things work on the standard units as well as my simplified electrical units. And this is common to various physicists who eliminate the standard set of units.
But I can measure G and U.They have different values.Also I can use them in equations and only one of them works.If I try to set up a satellite using your wrong value for G it crashes.If I try to design a capacitor using your wrong value for U it won't do what I want.Do you realise that, if reality does not agree with your idea it is not because reality has made a mistake?(and you need to stop telling the lie that your idea is a theory)
The post proposes this returns science to the logical physics of Newton and Galileo