0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
The declaration that a hypothesis is 'wrong' is an opinion
All my equations come from standard unit equations with coulombs, kilograms, meters, and seconds.
The declaration that a hypothesis is 'wrong' is an opinion,
All my equations come from standard unit equations with coulombs, kilograms, meters, and seconds
I have asked countless times for "Observational Data" to explain if protons attract electrons why do they not hit and become absorbed?
Quantum is the faux science which explains this mystery.
If science accepts that electrons are "homers" you get the workable definition of gravity that eluded Einstein.
but my coulombs are Kg Sec/Met
Yes the numbers are slightly different but the equation is a best fit numeric equation which is close enough for my purposes.
I believe that there are ideal numbers for the constants and light speed Co which would be measured in an area of space that was free from high gravitational densities and velocities.
My ideal light speed is slightly higher than we measure.
close enough for my purposes.
Kryptoid: Please demonstrate in what sense a coulomb is a kilogram-second/meter.GG:For the assumption that the universe could be specified in terms of coulombs, meters, and seconds or Kilograms, Meters, and seconds, A study of 8 leading possibilities show that Coulombs = Kilograms seconds per meter or alternatively Kilograms = coulombs meters per second is the best fit. Scientifically what does this mean? In Engineering schools electrical models are produced to turn transient mechanical problems into ordinary electrical problems. This enables complex problems to be solved readily. So I produced a best fit electrical model of the universe. Is it true for everything or is it a tool to learn more about the universe from an electrical perspective? In 1981-3 it seemed completely true to me. However it may only be a best fit model.
GG: Since I use the MKS system for my calculations the results are the same. They are not the same for my numerical approximations as I study the numerical relationships among the constants of the universe.
Looking at Plank’s Constant the units areh = Cou Met^3/Sec^2If h is a true constant. As the universe expands the meters will expand and the seconds will expand for a constant light speed. Therefore the charge of an electron and proton will decay. It also means that after big bang the charge of an electron and proton was much higher.
I believe that there are ideal numbers for the constants and light speed Co which would be measured in an area of space that was free from high gravitational densities and velocities.Kryptid: According to relativity, that would make no difference. The speed of light is invariant to the observer.GG: I believe that relativity is a mathematical best fit solution to the universe. I doubt if you somehow got on a piece of a planet traveling at 0.2C that you would get the same results as here upon the earth. It is just that since we live on a very linear portion of space that Einstein’s equations work so very well.
Why are you so certain?
It would be interesting to get a measurement of the speed of light on the moon and on a moving spaceship in a very weak gravitational field.