0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
In the SCIENCE BASED THEORY OF CREATION post, if the polarity inversion hypothesis ‘carries’
To ensure we are on the same page, my only request to the ‘vociferous’ is that your opinions begin with your own pre Big Bang theories
Kryptid claims15/02 "The Big Bang wasn't an explosion". So what was it then? Surely it must have been violent?
If all the stuff was at the big bang point then an explosion would be the right word.
I do not believe
Quantum is faux science invented to answer questions that failed to be answered within the physics of Newton and Galileo.
for the core temperature of hydrogen floating in infinity to reach the flashpoint of hydrogen, +565.5C
THE SCIENCE-BASED THEORY OF CREATION, posted above, has been reproduced in the BBC's Science Focus website. Perhaps now a dialogue/debate/argument will begin.
Quote from: rstormview on 01/03/2020 11:51:36Quantum is faux science invented to answer questions that failed to be answered within the physics of Newton and Galileo.How come it works then?If you say it's false, then you must be able to show some case where it gives the wrong answer- ie a case where QM does not give the same result as an experiment.So, go on; cite that experiment.