The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. That CAN'T be true!
  4. My new theory has been recognized by Google
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

My new theory has been recognized by Google

  • 30 Replies
  • 18934 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Yahya A.Sharif (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 302
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
My new theory has been recognized by Google
« on: 24/09/2019 18:39:43 »
Search key words:
Is gravity range limited ?
« Last Edit: 15/03/2020 16:41:51 by Yahya A.Sharif »
Logged
 



Offline chiralSPO

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 3453
  • Activity:
    1.5%
  • Thanked: 434 times
    • View Profile
Re: My new theory has been recognized by Google!
« Reply #1 on: 24/09/2019 18:54:16 »
...you do realize that anything posted online in a searchable format is "recognized by google", right?

Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 21969
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 510 times
    • View Profile
Re: My new theory has been recognized by Google!
« Reply #2 on: 24/09/2019 19:25:36 »
Google recognises "which can be negative, and a number of apples"- as part of my refutation of your ideas.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline Yahya A.Sharif (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 302
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Re: My new theory has been recognized by Google!
« Reply #3 on: 24/09/2019 20:10:42 »
Am I in a science forum ?

Picture attached.

* Screenshot from 2019-09-24 20-54-01.png (131.28 kB, 1600x900 - viewed 205 times.)
« Last Edit: 25/09/2019 12:46:51 by Yahya A.Sharif »
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 21969
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 510 times
    • View Profile
Re: My new theory has been recognized by Google!
« Reply #4 on: 24/09/2019 20:13:59 »
I can post
"The moon is made of blue cheese. My evidence for this is that my cat, Fizzy, told me it is so".
on this science forum.
In a while, Google will index it. And then if I google it, the search will find this page.

Do you understand that google finding something does not mean it is true.
It also does not mean that it is science.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



Offline Yahya A.Sharif (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 302
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Re: My new theory has been recognized by Google!
« Reply #5 on: 24/09/2019 20:22:18 »
Do you understand the first site with quotes above it mean ?

picture attached:
diabetes insipidus

* Screenshot from 2019-09-24 21-16-03.png (132.19 kB, 1600x900 - viewed 182 times.)
Logged
 

Offline Yahya A.Sharif (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 302
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Re: My new theory has been recognized by Google!
« Reply #6 on: 24/09/2019 20:58:31 »
The first site with quotes above it refers to the scientific information that has been chosen by Google someone is searching for, this means Google approved my new theory

« Last Edit: 25/09/2019 09:59:41 by Yahya A.Sharif »
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 21969
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 510 times
    • View Profile
Re: My new theory has been recognized by Google!
« Reply #7 on: 24/09/2019 21:01:09 »
Google finds words.

It does not know what the words mean.
It does not judge if they are right.

You have posted two pictures, one is a clip from this web site in which you say things that are wrong.
The other is a clip from a wiki page about diabetes.


Do you understand that google will find a group of words and post a section of the page where it finds those words.

If you search for " in the beginning was the Word" then it will find the book of Genesis. That doesn't make Genesis correct.

If you search for " Not a nasty, dirty, wet hole, filled with the ends of worms and an oozy smell, " Google will find you the opening chapter of The Hobbit.
That doesn't mean that Tolkien's book is science.

So, what is it that you think you have achieved?
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 5754
  • Activity:
    99.5%
  • Thanked: 240 times
    • View Profile
Re: My new theory has been recognized by Google
« Reply #8 on: 24/09/2019 21:32:59 »
Quote from: Yahya A.Sharif on 24/09/2019 20:58:31
that means my theory is approved by Google

LOL at the idea of Google being some kind of science authority.
Logged
 



Offline Yahya A.Sharif (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 302
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Re: My new theory has been recognized by Google
« Reply #9 on: 25/09/2019 06:41:36 »
Quote from: Kryptid on 24/09/2019 21:32:59
Quote from: Yahya A.Sharif on 24/09/2019 20:58:31
that means my theory is approved by Google

LOL at the idea of Google being some kind of science authority.
Who are you to underestimate google site ?
"Science authority " ? LOL what does that even mean?
« Last Edit: 25/09/2019 11:43:05 by Yahya A.Sharif »
Logged
 

Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 5754
  • Activity:
    99.5%
  • Thanked: 240 times
    • View Profile
Re: My new theory has been recognized by Google
« Reply #10 on: 25/09/2019 07:07:19 »
Quote from: Yahya A.Sharif on 25/09/2019 06:41:36
Who are you to underestimate google site ? are you drunk?

Google does not screen its content for scientifically accurate information. You can find all kinds of fringe material with a Google search.

Quote from: Yahya A.Sharif on 25/09/2019 06:41:36
"Science authority " ? LOL what does that even mean?

It means that Google is not a science website.
Logged
 

Offline Yahya A.Sharif (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 302
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Re: My new theory has been recognized by Google
« Reply #11 on: 25/09/2019 07:31:55 »
Quote from: Kryptid on 25/09/2019 07:07:19
Google does not screen its content for scientifically accurate information. You can find all kinds of fringe material with a Google search.
Read posts #5 and #6
Quote from: Kryptid on 25/09/2019 07:07:19

Quote from: Yahya A.Sharif on 25/09/2019 06:41:36
"Science authority " ? LOL what does that even mean?
Google is not a science website.
Really? see posts #5 and #6
« Last Edit: 25/09/2019 07:49:48 by Yahya A.Sharif »
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 21969
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 510 times
    • View Profile
Re: My new theory has been recognized by Google
« Reply #12 on: 25/09/2019 08:16:59 »
Quote from: Yahya A.Sharif on 25/09/2019 07:31:55
Quote from: Kryptid on 25/09/2019 07:07:19
Google does not screen its content for scientifically accurate information. You can find all kinds of fringe material with a Google search.
Read posts #5 and #6
Quote from: Kryptid on 25/09/2019 07:07:19

Quote from: Yahya A.Sharif on 25/09/2019 06:41:36
"Science authority " ? LOL what does that even mean?
Google is not a science website.
Really? see posts #5 and #6
Yes, really.
If you look at post  5 you will see that Google gives a search result which is nonsense.
Quote from: Yahya A.Sharif on 25/09/2019 06:41:36
"Science authority " ? LOL what does that even mean?
"science authority" means some sort of authority on science.
LOL is an abbreviation for "laugh out loud"- though the use is generally hyperbole.

You really don't seem to understand that Google can't think.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 5754
  • Activity:
    99.5%
  • Thanked: 240 times
    • View Profile
Re: My new theory has been recognized by Google
« Reply #13 on: 25/09/2019 16:43:57 »
Quote from: Yahya A.Sharif on 25/09/2019 07:31:55
Read posts #5 and #6

And I can show you a Google search that brings up things about young Earth creationism, orgone and chemtrails. Google isn't a science website.

Quote from: Yahya A.Sharif on 25/09/2019 07:31:55
Really?

Yes, really.
Logged
 

Offline Janus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 783
  • Activity:
    13%
  • Thanked: 186 times
    • View Profile
Re: My new theory has been recognized by Google
« Reply #14 on: 25/09/2019 17:13:22 »
If I type in "parkflyby" into google and select "videos", you'll find a video that shows a Star trek space shuttle flying over a park. 
If the description of that video had claimed that this was shot live on location, Google would have still brought it up. (any such claim would have been false. I should know, I made and posted that video)
Google doesn't care or have any way to know if something it links to is true, false, or just a random collection of words.  All it does is look for the key words in your search and brings up any links that contain them. 

So the fact that google brings up my video does not mean that it accepts that the space shuttle Galileo actually did a fly over of a park in South Africa.
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 21969
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 510 times
    • View Profile
Re: My new theory has been recognized by Google
« Reply #15 on: 25/09/2019 18:58:07 »
My new theory has been recognised by Google

* google.JPG (54.41 kB . 1034x397 - viewed 4363 times)
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 9182
  • Activity:
    72.5%
  • Thanked: 913 times
    • View Profile
Re: My new theory has been recognized by Google
« Reply #16 on: 26/09/2019 00:31:55 »
If you want something that is more scientifically believable, try Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.com/

This indexes material that people find more academically credible.

Surprise: Your article doesn't rate.
More surprise: This one does: "Does Turkey have a special trade relation with the EU?: A gravity model approach"
Logged
 



Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 5754
  • Activity:
    99.5%
  • Thanked: 240 times
    • View Profile
Re: My new theory has been recognized by Google
« Reply #17 on: 26/09/2019 01:02:56 »
Quote from: evan_au on 26/09/2019 00:31:55
More surprise: This one does: "Does Turkey have a special trade relation with the EU?: A gravity model approach"

Also:

"The Orgone Energy Accumulator in the Treatment of Cancer in Mice"
"Scientific Creationism"
"The Reptilian Connection" (about David Icke's shape-shifter conspiracy theory)
Logged
 

Offline Yahya A.Sharif (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 302
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Re: My new theory has been recognized by Google
« Reply #18 on: 26/09/2019 06:46:55 »
Quote from: evan_au on 26/09/2019 00:31:55
If you want something that is more scientifically believable, try Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.com/

This indexes material that people find more academically credible.
In contrary , Google found a valuable new theory in a forum " The naked scientist forum" , and they didn't find anything significant in Their Google Scholar  section, you have to understand what a first site with quotes above it means.
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 21969
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 510 times
    • View Profile
Re: My new theory has been recognized by Google
« Reply #19 on: 26/09/2019 07:26:08 »
Quote from: Yahya A.Sharif on 26/09/2019 06:46:55
Quote from: evan_au on 26/09/2019 00:31:55
If you want something that is more scientifically believable, try Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.com/

This indexes material that people find more academically credible.
In contrary , Google found a valuable new theory in a forum " The naked scientist forum" , and they didn't find anything significant in Their Google Scholar  section, you have to understand what a first site with quotes above it means.
Yes, it means that the moon is made of blue cheese.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



  • Print
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

What is your opinion about the "Big Rip Theory?"

Started by Joe L. OganBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 2
Views: 4929
Last post 28/11/2009 20:39:38
by Soul Surfer
How valid is the "build your resistance theory"?

Started by Johann Mahne Board Cells, Microbes & Viruses

Replies: 3
Views: 4509
Last post 29/10/2011 19:18:45
by Geezer
Is the most profound quest in all of physics the "Theory of Everything"?

Started by Alan McDougallBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 8
Views: 5760
Last post 18/08/2019 09:02:00
by Hayseed
How does Hawking's radiation helps in figuring out "the theory of everything"?

Started by Dr AmruthaBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 43
Views: 12921
Last post 13/06/2016 11:00:07
by LarryLee Booth
MOVED: New Theory: How electromagnetic radiation change from inverse cubic to inverse square

Started by Colin2BBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 0
Views: 780
Last post 28/10/2019 22:43:40
by Colin2B
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.23 seconds with 82 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.