[Kryptid]

To talk about the speed of light, one must understand its nature. The origin of light I proposed in my article

Why not give us the URL here? That would make it easier.

[sorlov (OP)]

My articles show calculations and justifications about the force and nature of gravity, the evolution of the Earth, the movement of celestial bodies and artificial spaceships, the mass of the photon, the atomic structure, the nature of potential energy and light, etc. All my articles can be viewed on my home page

[Halc]

Saw you referring to a center of the universe in it?

Why so he did. I didn't even catch that.

- The Universe ether and galaxies rotate around the center;

These regularities are confirmed by astrophysicists: the galaxies rotate around the center of the
Universe completing one turnover per 100 billion years [4].

Astrophysicists have apparently confirmed galaxies moving around this center, far faster than light even. Said astrophysicist referenced as: Kadyrov S K. General Physical Theory of Universal Field (Bishkek, 2001) [in Russian]

- all the celestial bodies increase their masses permanently.

Assertions about violation of mass/energy conservation as well I see.

[Kryptid]

See Google .........

I'm attempting to understand the equation you have in that article to determine the force of gravity. It's difficult to read it. Can you write the equation here so that it is easier to read? Also, I don't understand what the different variables in it mean. When you say "volume of nucleons in the body", are you talking about the total volume of all of the protons and neutrons added together? Also, if I wanted to perform a calculation with this equation, how would I go about determining what the "velocity of ether in orbit" is?

[sorlov (OP)]

This equation is derived in my theory of vortex gravity. This equation is my main discovery. All my articles and conclusions are based on it.  My theory has been published hundreds of times. Of course, the volume of nucleons is the volume of protons and neutrons. Ether flows act on the volume of nucleons. Since all nucleons have the same density, we easily move to their mass, that is, to the mass of the body. So I use Archimedes ' law and I don't have to "warp space-time" or engage in other unscientific fiction.

[Kryptid]

You didn't answer this question:

Also, if I wanted to perform a calculation with this equation, how would I go about determining what the "velocity of ether in orbit" is?

I don't have to "warp space-time" or engage in other unscientific fiction.

Except you are engaging in "unscientific fiction" because your model violates conservation of mass.

Besides, the warping of space-time has actually been measured (in multiple different experiments). It's far from fiction.

[Colin2B]

You didn't answer this question:

He just seems to be interested in advertising his site rather than discussing here. 

[sorlov (OP)]

My answer is in my theory of vortex gravity. It takes several pages with diagrams and equations. On the forum it cannot be migrated. I'm not advertising my site, but my theory. The theory of relativity has long been discredited, since it is built on the basis that the speed of light is the maximum in our world. But researchers have repeatedly recorded speeds exceeding the speed of light. When the speed of light is exceeded, the theory of relativity becomes absurd. If it is so difficult for you to come to my site, send your email to my address ion@sampo.ru and I'll send you my theory. My "fantasy" turned into reality in the calculation of solar gravity on the planet, as the error in the calculations for my equation is an order of magnitude smaller than in the calculations for the equations of Newton or Einstein.

[sorlov (OP)]

No ads, you can read my theory in a journal

[Colin2B]

No ads, you can read my theory in a journal

Please read our acceptable usage policy which says:
“If you start a thread with a post that is for all practical purposes the same as you have posted elsewhere, we will generally assume that you are evangelising, and will act accordingly.”

By constantly referencing other sites rather than properly discussing your ideas here, you are evangelising and attempting to give greater hit rates on google.
We will remove your links and references and unless you engage in full discussion here the thread will be locked or deleted.

Note also that, as has been pointed out a number of times, your equations are invalid as they do not match experimental results.

[Kryptid]

But researchers have repeatedly recorded speeds exceeding the speed of light.

When did that happen?

[sorlov (OP)]

Type in Wikipedia - "Superluminal motion" and get the answer.

[Kryptid]

Type in Wikipedia - "Superluminal motion" and get the answer.

And if you read the article, you will see that there are ways to account for the observations without requiring matter to actually move faster than light.

[sorlov (OP)]

In experiments conducted at CERN (European center for nuclear research) to superluminal speeds accelerated neutrino-subatomic elementary particle with mass. This is a well-known and not the only fact. If you direct the beam from the flashlight into the mirror, then what will be the speed of the reflected beam in relation to the directional.

[syhprum]

The spot on my high performance oscilloscope moves faster than the speed of light but it does not shake my belief in SR

[sorlov (OP)]

Einstein once said of the Bible that it was an interesting children's tale. I want to add, his theory of relativity is not a child's, but an adult fairy tale. I must say, my topic is my theory of vortex gravity, not relativity. Please comment on my theory.

[Kryptid]

In experiments conducted at CERN (European center for nuclear research) to superluminal speeds accelerated neutrino-subatomic elementary particle with mass. This is a well-known and not the only fact. If you direct the beam from the flashlight into the mirror, then what will be the speed of the reflected beam in relation to the directional.

I'm guessing you didn't keep up with the developments on that story: https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2012/06/once-again-physicists-debunk-faster-light-neutrinos

Einstein once said of the Bible that it was an interesting children's tale. I want to add, his theory of relativity is not a child's, but an adult fairy tale.

Then it's an adult's fairy tale with massive experimental evidence in support of it, such as the detection of gravitational waves, the accurate quantification of the anomalous precession of Mercury's orbit, the accurate quantification of the orbital decay of a neutron star binary, the accurate prediction of time dilation effects (both gravitational and velocity-dependent), E=mc² being measured to extremely high accuracy. the detection of the geodetic effect, and the accurate quantification of gravitational lensing, among others.

Please comment on my theory.

I have. It violates conservation of mass and ignores the experimental evidence supporting the gravitational constant. So I'm going to have to conclude that it does not accord with the evidence.

Do you plan on answering this question any time soon?

Also, if I wanted to perform a calculation with this equation, how would I go about determining what the "velocity of ether in orbit" is?

[sorlov (OP)]

In my theory, the law of conservation of mass is not violated. Where did you find this violation?
The speed of ether in each orbit is determined by the force of gravity in this orbit and by my formula, just like the gravitational constant is determined, which in reality is a reduction coefficient and has no physical meaning. I repeat again - look at my comparative calculations to determine the forces of solar gravity and maybe you will understand whose equation is true.

[syhprum]

Although I am in agreement with the explanation for the superluminal speed of the Neutrinos in the quoted experiment I see no reason why Neutrinos should not travel faster than light (by a tiny amount) in inter galactic space.
inter galactic space is not completely empty and Photons interact far more with matter than Neutrinos. 

[sorlov (OP)]

Хотя я согласен с объяснением сверхсветовой скорости нейтрино в процитированном эксперименте, я не вижу причины, по которой нейтрино не должны путешествовать быстрее света (на крошечную величину) в межгалактическом пространстве.
межгалактическое пространство не совсем пустое, и фотоны взаимодействуют с материей гораздо больше, чем нейтрино.

Хотя я согласен с объяснением сверхсветовой скорости нейтрино в процитированном эксперименте, я не вижу причины, по которой нейтрино не должны путешествовать быстрее света (на крошечную величину) в межгалактическом пространстве.
межгалактическое пространство не совсем пустое, и фотоны взаимодействуют с материей гораздо больше, чем нейтрино.

Нейтрино могут сколько угодно путешествовать, но превышение скорости света нейтрино означает крах теории относительности.