[Daxiazun (OP)]

Frequency  Universe realities Theory
 
   Sorry the long one was a bit vague . All life and matter is energy based . It all has a frequency . It also vibrates which is called a resonance ,not the one i'm looking for . Since all matter has a similar Frequency (Universal data) How does gravity fit in?Could we change our frequency ?and if we could , what would it do? Possibly break apart the object or shift it to another frequency? Your thoughts?

[Kryptid]

We have a section for topics like this (New Theories), but I'll let another moderator move it because I didn't do it right the last time I tried.

I challenge all to prove me wrong .

You are shifting the burden of proof. It isn't our job to prove you wrong. It is your job to provide evidence to support your idea.

If you can not use hard evidence , then don't grief with BS .

But you don't have hard evidence either. It's speculation.

[Daxiazun (OP)]

My bad , new to the Forum thing. Normally deal with people directly on theories and concepts. The Mandela is pushing it for any sort of proof . I was using it for a base concept . However you are right , there is no solid proof that can not be discarded. The only thing I am really interested in is the Frequency of matter concept . Much like radios , all existence is on a frequency wave length. Seems to be the normal in our universe for all matter to have roughly the same frequency. Made me think , what if. Then I thought about gravity and how there is a missing equation. Maybe there is more then one frequency ? That is what I am really getting at , would love thoughts on it. Tried to simplify it as best I could.
 I updated the post for a more direct approach .

[Kryptid]

The only thing I am really interested in is the Frequency of matter concept .

Subatomic particles can indeed be said to have a frequency of some kind (due to their wave nature), but it is a quantity that varies widely from one particle to another. As far as I know, there isn't any single frequency that all matter in our Universe has.

[Bored chemist]

It all has a frequency

Citation needed.
Unless you can prove that's true, you don't have a "theory", you have bad science fiction.

Since all matter has a similar Frequency and the concept of a mirror type style of a universe.

Meaningless word salad.

How does gravity fit in?

You tell us; it's your fairy tale.

Could we change our frequency ?

What frequency?

and if we could , what would it do? Possibly break apart the object or shift it to another frequency?

Fairly obviously, if we could change that frequency (whatever that means) then that would "shift it to another frequency".

Your thoughts?

I think you should learn some science.

[Daxiazun (OP)]

Ok , for the guy who feels the need to insult . The frequency I am referring to is data . Everything is data no matter how you look at it . What I mean by mirror universe is this , looking in the mirror with a mirror results in seeing many of the same scene over and over , still not sure I explained that right. Tell you what , explain to me how the universal data works and I will listen intently . My Theory is we have it wrong on how the basics of the universe works. Some have the concept that we live in a holographic universe . That still indicates a data universe . Since data can and is transferred no stop everyday all day, it is not hard to believe our lives are just one big code .

 Where gravity comes in . What do we know about gravity? Nothing. If you think otherwise you are gluing . The mainstream science still has no clue how gravity really works and it is all conjecture . The problem is we are missing certain equations to fill in the gaps . If the universe is data , and if it followed a mathematical routine , You could look at every instance as a frequency wave length . If there were millions of them , gravity may permeate them all . Which would explain why gravity is so weak and strong  at the same time. It would also mean other universal frequencies would be endless and so would gravity. I understand people disliking new ideas , or flopping their toxic ways to discourage . But what if i'm right ? Every new science gets laughed at , poked , discredited. Its fine . Telling someone to learn science because you clearly misunderstood or the concept was laid down wrong is a douche move! If anyone has anything relating to this, any credited papers referring to the universe being data , or experiments that have been documented . Please let me know . Once again its an idea I would like to investigate.

[Bored chemist]

The mainstream science still has no clue how gravity really works and it is all conjecture .

Plain wrong.
We have data
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LIGO

It is precisely because you say foolish things like that that I think you need to learn some science.
It also makes your comment

the guy who feels the need to insult

look a bit silly.
What you did there was insult all the scientists who (unlike you) do understand gravity.

But what if i'm right ?

The evidence makes it plain that you are not.

By the way, you forgot to address most of the points I made.

[Kryptid]

The frequency I am referring to is data . Everything is data no matter how you look at it .

I'm still not understanding this. Frequency is a measure of cycles per unit time. Data need not have any kind of cycle or time measure. A hard drive can contain a megabyte of data and that is independent of any time measurement.

[Daxiazun (OP)]

Bored Chemist , I addressed your relevant points , you are more interested in slamming people then your are helping . If you were not so toxic, I am sure you would be fun to debate with .Maybe check how you approach people . No one likes an ass hat. As to your GRAVITY thing , I am glad you feel the research is done with it . I did not insult the people working on it, Fact is according to them ,the research is far from done . Wait , maybe you know better then MIT, I should be asking you for this info then?  Since you seem to know it all? OR what I am actually going to do is ignore your stupidity. Please keep to yourself .

 Kryptid -  Maybe frequency is a bad term , I am trying to simplify things , Maybe a line of code would be better . Hence the main reason I am in a forum for once . Basically I am trying to find a way to fill in a equation plus explain a few things .  The Universe projects into itself , and was the "Big bang" powerful enough to create more then one reality. Things  like that . If there was more then 1 reality , how would it work? I brought up gravity due its nature of WTF. Strong enough to hold a galaxy together , but weak enough we defeat it daily. Since Nature always has balance , and we find no balance for gravity, its perfectly fine tuned ,  what is really going on ? Some go off about sci-fi , well to be honest , all scientific discoveries started as such. Was just a thought. Then someone acted on it. If you have ideas , hit me up . Its your questions I like.

[Bored chemist]

you are more interested in slamming people then your are helping

* than *

I am glad you feel the research is done with it

I never  said that.
This is a science forum; we are good at spotting logical fallacies.
I suggest you don't even try to use them.

I did not insult the people working on it,

What do we know about gravity? Nothing. If you think otherwise you are gluing

OK, why do you get upset when I say you should learn science, when you don't think that claiming that scientists no nothing is an insult?

[Daxiazun (OP)]

Sorry bud , I'm not upset , I do not deal with people like you who purposely attack and are a genuine asshole. Once again have a good day . I want nothing to do with you!

[Bored chemist]

I want nothing to do with you!

Let me get this straight.
You turn up on a science web page, you post stuff that's not science and, when someone points out that your stuff isn't science, you act like they caused the problem and call them rude names- while saying you're not the one who is insulting people.

How were you expecting that to turn out?

[Daxiazun (OP)]

"Let me get this straight.
You turn up on a science web page, you post stuff that's not science and, when someone points out that your stuff isn't science, you act like they caused the problem and call them rude names- while saying you're not the one who is insulting people.

How were you expecting that to turn out?"

 Well son , turns out you need to update your English  . I could rip you apart piece by piece . I am not you . What I am going to say is this , Science is about discovery , there are no wrong questions , just discovery . If you discover something does not work , then you have learned something new . How do you not know this? You went as far as to say I purposely insulted the scientific community because I repeated what they said about their own field of study. What is wrong with you?
 
 I have yet to see a post from you in any posts being helpful in anyway . You are here just to be toxic .Trying to say I take exception because you call me out on something you have no clue on is bs . All you are doing is trying to feel good about yourself at the risk of others. You are not a good individual. Go seek help, its clear you are having a rough go in life, maybe go get laid? Oddly enough , companionship helps a ton for mental stress . Maybe look into it . Either way you are too toxic. Even if I am wrong about my theory , No proof ... BECAUSE .. its JUST a theory, hence looking for proof ,  you have no right to act that way towards anyone! Stop thinking you are entitled and grow up!

[Bored chemist]

there are no wrong questions

There are wrong assertions.

all matter has a similar Frequency

And you can't base science on them.

turns out you need to update your English

In what way?

 I have yet to see a post from you in any posts being helpful in anyway . You are here just to be toxic .

Are pesticides helpful?

something you have no clue on

What would that be, exactly?

All you are doing is trying to feel good about yourself at the risk of others.

No
I'm trying to trim the meaningless clutter from the page.
Why are you trying to add to it?

You are not a good individual.

You don't know me anything like well enough to justify that, do you?

JUST a theory, hence looking for proof

You need to look again at what the word means.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theory

you have no right to act that way towards anyone!

You have no right to come here and fail to follow the rules- which require that you back up your assertions.

Stop thinking you are entitled and grow up!

Since I'm the wrong side of 50, I think, at the least, I'm entitled to be called a grumpy old man, rather than told to grow up- especially byu someone whose  speciality seems to be rude words .


The best way to stop me pointing out that you post nonsense is simple.
Don't post nonsense.
Now, stop crying about what I write, and make sure that what you write actually makes sense.

[evan_au]

The frequency I am referring to is data . .... If the universe is data , and if it followed a mathematical routine , You could look at every instance as a frequency wave length

This sounds like the modern fashion of treating the brain (or the human body or universe) as software.

It has a long history of using the current technology as a metaphor - whether the current technology be DNA, electricity, chemistry, pulleys or levers...

Now one just needs to justify where the metaphor is appropriate and relevant.
...and if you have a pretty good description of the phenomenon itself (like we do for gravity in General Relativity), then we don't need a metaphor!

[Kryptid]

Kryptid -  Maybe frequency is a bad term , I am trying to simplify things , Maybe a line of code would be better . Hence the main reason I am in a forum for once . Basically I am trying to find a way to fill in a equation plus explain a few things .  The Universe projects into itself

Perhaps you'd be interested in this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holographic_principle

Strong enough to hold a galaxy together , but weak enough we defeat it daily.

That's because gravity has a cumulative effect. There isn't an antigravity to cancel it out (at least that we know of), so as more and more mass is added to a system, more and more gravity results. This is the opposite of how it is with electromagnetism, where opposite charges seek each other out and neutralize each other so that large, natural electric fields are relatively rare by comparison.