The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. Is this a better model of an electron?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Is this a better model of an electron?

  • 2 Replies
  • 3330 Views
  • 1 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline self (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 24
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Is this a better model of an electron?
« on: 23/02/2020 21:31:13 »
Using a golf ball to represent the nucleus wrap the golf ball with a linear curving wave of yarn. When you get down to the last couple of inches, stick your finger in the yarn, wriggle it around and pull your finger out leaving a hole narrower at the bottom than at the top. Use the last few inches of yarn to line the hole beginning at the bottom so that you have a linear curving wave inside linear curving waves. The hole is the electron.

Basis for claim. The electromagnetic field, the part that emits photons, should consist of bi polar oblong little magnets which when vectoring as a linear curving wave produce a negative charge. The oblong is important as this allows the wave to curve. These virtual electron cloud constituents have to be connected negative to positive pole and that prevents the "cloud" formation so often referred to. In this model the linear wave is forced into layers which orbit in unison. The pull of the nucleus causes in effect a whirlpool like affect and the lowest point, the hole in the linear sea is the electron. The sea could snap shut but that would only cause the electron to reappear elsewhere by the same mechanisms.
Logged
 



Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 8082
  • Activity:
    1.5%
  • Thanked: 514 times
Re: Is this a better model of an electron?
« Reply #1 on: 23/02/2020 22:54:13 »
Quote from: self on 23/02/2020 21:31:13
linear curving wave

What is a "linear curving wave"?
Logged
 

Offline self (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 24
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Is this a better model of an electron?
« Reply #2 on: 24/02/2020 02:14:00 »
Being a newbie this reply may show up three times. If you just want an example then a linear curving wave could be like extruding a garden hose into a box. It would go round and round in the box forming a long linear curving hose or in this model of the electron's field a linear curving wave.

Waves are either linear or non linear and come in an assortment. It you were to send a beam of electrons through two slits, in this theory the beam would form a cylindrical linear wave so that one portion could pass through one slit while another portion of the wave passed through the other slit.
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: linear curving wave 
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.566 seconds with 32 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.