0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
So far you couldn't offer even one real law of science that theory D violet.
So, how can we take a variant that only valid for velocity and convert it to distance?
Do you understand the idea of indirect measurement?
The Black body radiation in the CMB is a clear indication that our Universe is Infinite in its size.
QuoteQuote from: Dave Lev on Today at 13:59:07So far you couldn't offer even one real law of science that theory D violet.Conservation of energy.
Quote from: Dave Lev on Today at 13:59:07So far you couldn't offer even one real law of science that theory D violet.
Do you understand the idea of indirect measurement?And, as I suspected, the answer is no.Here's the bit you missed.We do not measure distance by red shift.We measure distance by using standard candles.But there aren't usually enough of those , so we extrapolate measured distances using red shift.
QuoteQuote from: Dave Lev on 18/03/2020 19:21:42The Black body radiation in the CMB is a clear indication that our Universe is Infinite in its size.And it's a violation of the laws of physics.Because the CMB would look the same if we were in a large (but finite) cold box which obeys the laws of physics.
Quote from: Dave Lev on 18/03/2020 19:21:42The Black body radiation in the CMB is a clear indication that our Universe is Infinite in its size.
the process of creating new mass and increasing its mass during that process without violating the Conservation of energy or the thermodynamic law.
That violates conservation of mass-energy by the very definition of what mass-energy conservation is. That's like arguing that you stole something from a store but you aren't a thief. It's an oxymoron
Do you agree that the kinetic energy that is given to the new created particles is due to the BH's gravity force?If so, you have to agree that this is the source for the extra energy that is needed to create new particles, new gas clouds, new stars, New BH and new galaxies in our Universe.The BH's gravity force is for free and we can use it without any need to steal something from anyone.
Do you agree that the kinetic energy that is given to the new created particles is due to the BH's gravity force?Please, Yes or no?
QuoteQuote from: Dave Lev on Today at 22:39:16Do you agree that the kinetic energy that is given to the new created particles is due to the BH's gravity force?Please, Yes or no?Yes and that gravitational potential energy is finite.
Quote from: Dave Lev on Today at 22:39:16Do you agree that the kinetic energy that is given to the new created particles is due to the BH's gravity force?Please, Yes or no?
There is no "extra energy". If the energy in the system is not constant, then the law of conservation of energy is violated.
Which of these statements is true?(1) Mass-energy can be created and thus the law of conservation of mass-energy is violated, or(2) Mass-energy cannot be created and thus the law of conservation of mass-energy is not violated.There is no third option possible.
Once you confirm that the kinetic energy that is given to the new created particles is due to the BH's gravity force, than you have to agree that this BH gravity force contribute new energy (kinetic energy) to our Universe.
You have just confirmed that the BH gravity force contributes new kinetic energy to our universe.
Yes there is a third option:(3) Kinetic energy for new created particles is created by the BH's gravity without violating the law of conservation of mass-energy
I agree that the CMB would look the same ONLY if we were in the CENTER of a large (but finite) sphere.
This is not a true option because it is an oxymoron.
QuoteQuote from: Dave Lev on Yesterday at 23:05:22Once you confirm that the kinetic energy that is given to the new created particles is due to the BH's gravity force, than you have to agree that this BH gravity force contribute new energy (kinetic energy) to our Universe.No it doesn't. That energy isn't new nor is it unlimited.
Quote from: Dave Lev on Yesterday at 23:05:22Once you confirm that the kinetic energy that is given to the new created particles is due to the BH's gravity force, than you have to agree that this BH gravity force contribute new energy (kinetic energy) to our Universe.
Which of these statements is true?(1) Mass-energy can be created and thus the law of conservation of mass-energy is violated, or(2) Mass-energy cannot be created and thus the law of conservation of mass-energy is not violated.
I'll answer that once you've answered this (though to be fair, I answered that question a long time ago):Quote from: Kryptid on 03/07/2020 22:33:09Which of these statements is true?(1) Mass-energy can be created and thus the law of conservation of mass-energy is violated, or(2) Mass-energy cannot be created and thus the law of conservation of mass-energy is not violated.
Yes there is a third option:(3) Kinetic energy for new created particles is created by the BH's gravity without violating the law of conservation of mass-energyThis new energy is used to create new Mass and thus the law of conservation of mass-energy is not violated.
If it comes from other source, than why do you confirm that this energy is due to the BH's gravity force?Would you kindly explain the contradiction?
I have already answered this question:
If you did not give (1) or (2) as an answer, you did not answer the question. Instead, you made up some nonsense that contradicts itself and pretended that it was an answer. Here is an analogy for what you did: Let's say that I asked you "which do you agree with?:"(1) You did not steal and therefore did not commit theft, or(2) You did steal and therefore did commit theft.
Did you honestly not see the clear contradiction in terms here?
Your analogy is completely wrong.
Do you confirm that gravity force is for free?
So you are claiming that a law that says "energy cannot be created" is somehow, magically, not violated when energy is created?
Force is not energy. Please don't make this mistake again.