The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. Is the Quantum/Classical boundary, Coherence VS Decoherence?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Is the Quantum/Classical boundary, Coherence VS Decoherence?

  • 1 Replies
  • 2149 Views
  • 3 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Wave Packets (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 1
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Is the Quantum/Classical boundary, Coherence VS Decoherence?
« on: 04/04/2020 17:19:13 »
Coherence is for quantum waves that can entangle, tunnel, and be in superposition. Decoherence is for physical/classical particles.

Somewhere around 50,000 bonded atoms will automatically be decohered. Anything smaller requires a decoherence event in its path to be classical.

If an object needs a decoherence event in its path to decohere, is it physical/real after the event? Is it still a group of wave packets, but only condensed now? Does it take around 50,000 bonded atoms to be physical particles? This explains why decohered particles can be influenced by the quantum field ..they are still waves. Decoherence is causing condensed wave packets that give the impression they are physical. Is decohered-condensed wave packets a new state of matter?

Are all quantum fields coherent? Is coherence the language of the unobservable? Is coherence the medium in which quantum waves propagate? Does coherence also exist in the future to flag decoherence events?

This is the Unified Theory.

Did we overlook one crucial detail about duality? Duality is not a physical/wave object. It is never physical, it is either waves or condensed wave packets (decoherence).

Decoherence and Wave collapse are not the same thing. Wave collapse is when a particle hits a physical object and dead stops. Decoherence is a particle being measured in flight and allowed to continue moving on its path. Decoherence now means all quantum particles are not physical/real.
Coherence is the state a wave has to be in to perform quantum weirdness events. Coherence is orderly waves.
Logged
 



Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 8082
  • Activity:
    1.5%
  • Thanked: 514 times
Re: Is the Quantum/Classical boundary, Coherence VS Decoherence?
« Reply #1 on: 04/04/2020 17:24:40 »
Nice try, Pitts.
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: decoherence  / duality  / classical 
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 1.581 seconds with 29 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.