0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
On the other hand we already knew how photons were formed.
I don't see a mechanism at that reference.
Just in case anyone missed the question.Quote from: Bored chemist on 01/05/2020 13:03:50Quote from: talanum1 on 01/05/2020 12:37:22What part of it does not make sense? Is there anyone reading this who knows what any part of tantalum1's diagram means?
Quote from: talanum1 on 01/05/2020 12:37:22What part of it does not make sense? Is there anyone reading this who knows what any part of tantalum1's diagram means?
What part of it does not make sense?
Doesn't total internal reflection suggest that a photon has structure?
It just takes a little getting used to.
Relativistic mass is just an invention.
Mass/ energy is just confusion and have no meaning
If the above is true.Energy due to motion and rest mass both can be treated as matter.
why not a photon ?
Quote from: Yahya A.Sharif on 15/05/2020 15:31:51Mass/ energy is just confusion and have no meaningThe fact that nuclear bombs work is proof that you are wrong.
In any case, every test of special relativity to date has passed. So if you are positing that special relativity has a flaw, then it is significantly more likely that you are mistaken than relativity being mistaken. Unless, of course, you can point out the flaws in the experiments. Can you?
The term "photon" is very specific. It refers to the quantum of the electromagnetic force. It is a boson particle with a spin of one, is electrically-neutral and does not have a rest mass. It something does not have those characteristics, then it isn't a photon.
There is not a proof for relativistic mass .That is there is not a proof that mass increases and decelerate and prevent itself from reaching c.
Quote from: Kryptid on 16/05/2020 00:56:34Quote from: Yahya A.Sharif on 15/05/2020 15:31:51Mass/ energy is just confusion and have no meaningThe fact that nuclear bombs work is proof that you are wrong.They work E=mc² .but the energy due to motion and rest mass shouldn't be added together. They are different .One is energy and the other is mass "compounds and elements" .So the Energy/Mass equivalence here is meaningless.Quote from: Kryptid on 16/05/2020 00:56:34In any case, every test of special relativity to date has passed. So if you are positing that special relativity has a flaw, then it is significantly more likely that you are mistaken than relativity being mistaken. Unless, of course, you can point out the flaws in the experiments. Can you?There is not a proof for relativistic mass .That is there is not a proof that mass increases and decelerate and prevent itself from reaching c.Quote from: Kryptid on 16/05/2020 00:56:34The term "photon" is very specific. It refers to the quantum of the electromagnetic force. It is a boson particle with a spin of one, is electrically-neutral and does not have a rest mass. It something does not have those characteristics, then it isn't a photon.Energy due to motion and energy of photon are both energy .I'm comparing between energy due to motion and the energy we know that a photon contains
Every photon is a wizard.The universe is filled with an infinite number of photons. and each of these photons moves away from its source at c speed. They even drags their source after them. They have the feature of shortening their own paths to keep their speeds in c value.* It is the mentality of special relativity theory.
One is energy and the other is mass "compounds and elements"
The universe is filled with an infinite number of photons.
and each of these photons moves away from its source at c speed.
They even drags their source after them.
They have the feature of shortening their own paths to keep their speeds in c value.
* It is the mentality of special relativity theory.
Quote from: xersanozgen on Yesterday at 12:37:00They have the feature of shortening their own paths to keep their speeds in c value.No, they don't.
Quote from: xersanozgen on Yesterday at 12:37:00The universe is filled with an infinite number of photons.Citation needed.
Quote from: Kryptid on 16/05/2020 20:54:31Quote from: xersanozgen on Yesterday at 12:37:00The universe is filled with an infinite number of photons.Citation needed.Citation: LOGIC
They are two different phases with different properties.
Relativistic mass is a different phase from mass and energy.
since energy conservation is an absolute and cannot be relative.
Another source of confusion in physics is the c reference; speed of light, is really the ground state of the universe and not a ceiling state
If a star has the speed 0.60 c , the way of a photon becomes L' = L (1 - v2/c2)1/2 = 0.80 L.
As if MAGIC TRİCK
Citation: LOGIC
A photon then does not have an inertia .