[talanum1 (OP)]

  Gravity can affect matter because particles are Riemann Spheres, therefore are spacetime. So gravity causes spacetime to warp and this causes "spacetime" to move. Gravity is just spacetime acting on spacetime.

  Believing matter is more than spacetime, one sits with the problem of how spacetime communicates forces to it.

[Bored chemist]

Gravity can affect matter because particles are Riemann Spheres

Non sequitur.

[talanum1 (OP)]

Non sequitur.

Do you mean it does not follow? Did you read further?

[Kryptid]

Please don't post your new theories in the main section of the forum.

[Bored chemist]

Non sequitur.

Do you mean it does not follow? Did you read further?

None of it follows.
Nor is there any evidence that any of it apart from "Gravity can affect matter " is true.

[talanum1 (OP)]

Believing that: you sit with the problem of how space communicates forces to matter.

I have evidence for it in my mind.

[evan_au]

I have evidence for it in my mind.

If the only evidence is in your imagination, then it belongs in New Theories.

As a forum oriented towards science, it would need some experimental evidence to be considered a well-supported theory.
- We sometimes also discuss mainstream theories in the general boards: Things like Dark Matter, Dark Energy and Gravitons. There is strong theoretical basis that these things exist, even though we can't see them.

Let's take an example: The Schrödinger equation has already shown excellent agreement with experiments on the electron since 1926. So to be believed, you have to show that your Riemann spheres model replicates every nuance of Schrödinger's equation.
- Then you have to discover some obscure counterexample where Schrödinger fails, but your theory works.
- Once you can handle an electron, you will find that modern Quantum theory predicts experimental results quite precisely, and deals with many different types of subatomic particles; you have to overturn that, too.

See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schr%C3%B6dinger_equation

I don't see any properties here that look like the probabilistic behaviors of subatomic particles (although the state of a qubit is sometimes described as a point on a sphere).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riemann_sphere

[talanum1 (OP)]

I do not have to show a counterexample to Schrodinger's equation since it postulates point particles and the Riemann Spheres can be sufficiently small to qualify as point particles.

For the same reason I do not have to overturn Quantum theory.

My model encodes all the intrinsic quantum numbers inside the particles, in the spirit of string theory. If this is not the case then space must have a table with all the particle names and properties. This is a long list.

[Bored chemist]

Believing that: you sit with the problem of how space communicates forces to matter.

Yes, that's correct.
But that doesn't mean I should accept mysticism  as an "answer" to the problem.

[Travis Tremlee]

  Gravity can affect matter because particles are Riemann Spheres, therefore are spacetime. So gravity causes spacetime to warp and this causes "spacetime" to move. Gravity is just spacetime acting on spacetime.

  Believing matter is more than spacetime, one sits with the problem of how spacetime communicates forces to it.

Empty space is not empty with its vacuum polarization and quantum fluctuations.  Your mention of the Riemann sphere seems to imply that matter is possibly analogous to a holographic projection...

The fundamental forces of nature are unified in higher dimensions, depending on which theory or model one is using. M-theory requires 11 dimensions I think.