[Bored chemist]

The idea that we might not have a heat death of the universe is a new theory.

So is  postulating that the higgs field might be ionised.

It might be better if you found out what the current theories are before  trying to come up with new ones.

[Tass (OP)]

The idea that we might not have a heat death of the universe is a new theory.

So is  postulating that the higgs field might be ionised.

It might be better if you found out what the current theories are before  trying to come up with new ones.

That wasn't a new theory ! It was in reply to a poster who mentioned heat death before I did .  .

My questions was about whether or not there was a chance the Higgs field is - and + which as we know equates to 0 net charge . If  the Higgs field is an electrical neutral field , how do we determine that neutral in this case is not  the same neutral as - and + ?

I am here for discussion on present physics , I have no theories at this time .

[Kryptid]

Can somebody explain why a mainstream question thread has been put into new theories ?

You insisted that the Higgs boson contains electric charges. Mainstream science says it doesn't.

My questions was about whether or not there was a chance the Higgs field is - and + which as we know equates to 0 net charge .

And when your question was given the mainstream science answer, you argued with it.

I have no theories at this time .

Good, because this was starting to sound a bit like your "N field".

But on a related note, the quantum vacuum is filled with electric charges in the form of virtual particles (but the Higgs is not one of those charged particles). Electrically-charged particles do indeed have an effect on those charges: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_polarization

[Bored chemist]

I have no theories at this time .

I doubt it stopped you before.

[yor_on]

Actually this section is more or less becoming what the section it was moved from was before the new rules Tass. If you take a look at posts from around 2010 and before the section " Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology The truth is out there, somewhere..." was a mix of what you find here and more serious questions. Today the rules seems to be that if your question leads to no defined answer it may be placed here. It seem as if TNS want that section to become one in where only stringent questions with clear answers should exist, as you can see from the way it is formulated as being questions ending with a question mark. It's slightly boring sometimes, but if that is the way, then that is the way TNS wants it.

[yor_on]

There is one thing though, maybe TNS should consider changing this sections name to something more inclusive. Every question not answerable doesn't become 'new physics'. Maybe we could lend  ' The truth is out there, somewhere...'  :)

[yor_on]

Sorry Tass, posted in the wrong place. Removed now.

[Tass (OP)]

Actually this section is more or less becoming what the section it was moved from was before the new rules Tass. If you take a look at posts from around 2010 and before the section " Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology The truth is out there, somewhere..." was a mix of what you find here and more serious questions. Today the rules seems to be that if your question leads to no defined answer it may be placed here. It seem as if TNS want that section to become one in where only stringent questions with clear answers should exist, as you can see from the way it is formulated as being questions ending with a question mark. It's slightly boring sometimes, but if that is the way, then that is the way TNS wants it.

Then they may as well just link the section to wiki information , that which we can all google anyway !

Science discussion suppose to be in the aim of trying to determine the truth , not some sort of dictatorship .

The replies were ''no'' , the Higgs has no electrical charge .  This answer may not be true as - and + equals a neutral charge .

How do we know it is a no if we can only measure electrical neutral ? 

What if the HIggs field does have charge properties and the HIggs field could be split like an atom ?

What if Einsteins space-time curvature was actually a Higgs field curvature ?

[Tass (OP)]

Can somebody explain why a mainstream question thread has been put into new theories ?

You insisted that the Higgs boson contains electric charges. Mainstream science says it doesn't.

I didn't insist anything , I asked a question with the expectation the question would be discussed and considered as opposed to wrote off in one swoop !

I'd rather agree with Tesla and an electrical universe or rather an electrical neutral universe .  Tesla  is a giant and to overlook his physics theory is a mistake for anybody .

What if the HIggs field is the quantum singularity , the mother of creation within ?


1.png (15.64 kB . 2800x1152 - viewed 2307 times)

[Kryptid]

Steve, your IP information gives you away. If you will recall, you were banned for making claims that The Naked Scientists had caused you mental harm and that someone here had tried to get you to kill someone. As such, we don't feel it is in our best interest to allow you to stay. Please stop coming back under sock puppet accounts.

[yor_on]

That can't be true Kryptid. I f*ng hate to go against TNS but you can't define it that way, You can see a IP, that's true, but you can't see who is behind it. If you want I can prove it.

[yor_on]

You went over the line there.

[yor_on]

It doesn't state that you're wrong, but it does state that you need more than the IP. And no matter the f*ng IP, . as long as I'm alive I won't accept anyone to hurt people that way. Tass may be the one you think of, or not, but you don't do it that way Kryptid. I have deepest respect for your knowledge, but I can't accept this.

[Bored chemist]

If it walks like a duck and it quacks like a duck, and has the same IP address as a duck...

[yor_on]

I know, it's difficult. We don't want people bringing with them lies. But this was about physics, right? And this is 'new theories' whatever that may mean for TNS? I don't really care but people are fragile, more than what you might expect. And every life BC start with a birth, and ends with a death. It's easy to pull someone down, but it's a lot harder to educate them.

[Bored chemist]

but it's a lot harder to educate them.

Especially when they refuse to learn.

[yor_on]

Can't argue with that BC.
But it's life.

You have to have patience.

[yor_on]

And let this be understood. Kryptid is one of the really good resources TNS have, Don't know where he comes from or who he is, but his knowledge is immense and so is his understanding. He knows where to state when he doesn't know, which I find impressive. and when he's sure he's most probably correct.

that's it Kryptid, that's how I look at you.

the rest is a mistake

[Kryptid]

(1) The IP was just the final piece of evidence needed. It showed that he came from the same town as Thebox. Before I was told that, I had already caught on to TheBox's particular mannerisms and peculiar use of English in this user. Plus he also started using those signature diagrams that he always draws. I was already 90% sure it was him before Colin2B told me about the IP and host information.

(2) Colin2B was the one who encouraged me to ban him. I initially had no such plans.

[Bored chemist]

It is fair to say there was some "behind the scenes" discussion about this.