[AlexandrKushnirtshuk (OP)]

Who iss Lying? - Astronauts: Stars In Space - Contradictions!
Are the crew members of 1986 Space Shuttle Challenger still alive?

[Bored chemist]

Who iss Lying? - Astronauts: Stars In Space - Contradictions!
Are the crew members of 1986 Space Shuttle Challenger still alive?

You are lying
No, they are not.

[Colin2B]

Who iss Lying? - Astronauts: Stars In Space - Contradictions!
Are the crew members of 1986 Space Shuttle Challenger still alive?

These are conspiracy theories and will be removed.
If you post anymore conspiracy theories you will be banned. Final warning.

[AlexandrKushnirtshuk (OP)]

The Michelson-Morley experiment is extremely complicated and multifactorial. As far as I understand, it does not take into account one significant factor in the official model of the Universe - the speed and direction of the Sun as part of the galaxy (that is, the speed and direction of movement of our galaxy in space).
But on the basis of my model of the Universe, I assume the absence of the above-mentioned factor in reality, and different parameters of other significant factors. I do not have sufficient mathematical knowledge, so I suggest to those who are interested - to recalculate the results of the Michelson-Morley experiment, taking into account the much smaller Earth's orbit and the speed of the Earth along it. Considering the movement of the Earth and the Sun around the common center of mass as in the animation below (Earth is larger), as well as the assumption that the Oort Cloud is the boundary of the Universe with a diameter of about one light minute. The value of the experiment is enormous. Data on it should be publicly available.

[Bored chemist]

As far as I understand, it does not take into account one significant factor in the official model of the Universe - the speed and direction of the Sun as part of the galaxy (that is, the speed and direction of movement of our galaxy in space).

You don't understand it then.
The clever bit about it is that it automatically includes that (and any other) motion.

I do not have sufficient mathematical knowledge

It shows.

recalculate the results of the Michelson-Morley experiment, taking into account the much smaller Earth's orbit and the speed of the Earth along it.

In reality (i.e. outside your hallucination) the Earth's orbit and speed are the Earth's orbit and speed.
It takes a year to go round and the radius is about 8 light minutes.

If that was wrong the moonshots would all have failed.
They didn't.

So, you are going to either set up some absurd conspiracy- for which you may get kicked off the forum- or you accept that you are wrong.

Just to be clear- why do you think Huygens, Cassini, Richer and Flamsteed  took part in  this conspiracy in the 17th C?

[AlexandrKushnirtshuk (OP)]

[Kryptid]

No, such a thing is not physically possible.

[hamdani yusuf]

Light doesn't travel through a medium

Can you clarify this statement? Fiber optics are used as internet back bone. I think it shows that light travel through a medium.

[Just thinking]

This is all valuable information from the school of hard knocks on the head.

[Kryptid]

Can you clarify this statement? Fiber optics are used as internet back bone. I think it shows that light travel through a medium.

What I mean is that there isn't good evidence for an aether (the supposed medium that light is a vibration of).

[AlexandrKushnirtshuk (OP)]

Can you clarify this statement? Fiber optics are used as internet back bone. I think it shows that light travel through a medium.

What I mean is that there isn't good evidence for an aether (the supposed medium that light is a vibration of).

The existence of the aether may have already been proven experimentally. The point is the speed of the Earth's movement in space, which depends on the length of the Earth's orbit.

Michelson–Morley experiment is a complex and extremely important experiment that has been refined and repeated since 1881. Its task is to prove the existence of a medium for the propagation of light and radio waves - aether. The main factor of this expetiment is the speed of the Earth's movement in space (the length of the Earth's orbit). The received data turns out to be much less than expected. In my model of the Universe, the length of the Earth's orbit and the speed of the Earth's movement are much less than the official ones ... It may (possibly) has already been experimentally proven: 1) the existence of aether; 2) my model of the Universe.



Ordinary waves have a medium - water.
Sound waves have a medium - a gas (atmosphere).
Do light and radio waves have a medium? The aether has not yet been officeally proven.

The aquatic environment is inhabited.
The gaseous environment (atmosphere) is inhabited.
Is the aether inhabited? Where do UFOs come from? Where do the “aliens” (angels / demons) live?

[AlexandrKushnirtshuk (OP)]

Could these traces on the Earth's surface be from the Sun and the Moon?

No, such a thing is not physically possible.

These traces on the surface of the Earth are a fact. A clear trace on the surface, and a tectonic plate completely repeating the outline of a trace on the surface. These traces and the tectonic plates that correspond to these traces have no analogues, and most likely have no unambiguous official explanation.

Since this is "That CAN'T be true!" section, here is my version to the origin of these traces.

Tectonic plates are formed under the pressure of a large mass, therefore they are also called continental plates. The Pacific plate is formed under the pressure of a homogeneous mass of water over a large area. The tectonic plates outlined in red rectangles (PHILIPPINE PLATE, COCOS PLATE, CARRIBEAN PLATE and SCOTIA PLATE) in the image below were formed under the pressure of large masses that were once there, but now they are not there - under the pressure of the Sun and the Moon. In addition, the tectonic plates outlined in red rectangles in the image below completely repeat the outlines of traces on the Earth's surface.



The Sun flew farther from the Earth and left only one trace on the surface (PHILIPPINE PLATE). The Moon hooked the Earth several times while entering its current orbit along an elliptical trajectory - it left three tracks on the Earth's surface: COCOS PLATE, CARRIBEAN PLATE and SCOTIA PLATE.

Japan - the land of the rising Sun.
The name of the country “Mexico” and the city of Mexico City are believed to be derived from the words metztli (“Moon”) and xictli (“navel, middle”), thus meaning “middle of the Moon”.



Why, over 70 years of space exploration (development) by the efforts of all mankind, this space is still not being mastered (developed) in any way? Of all the objects in the celestial sphere, all "stars" and "planets" for some reason are one to one + - brightness. Only the Sun and the Moon stand out with the same angular dimensions (the dimensions are proportional to the distances to the Earth) and the same axial rotation periods - 27 days.
New model of the Universe.

[Origin]

Where do the “aliens” (angels / demons) live?

What an intriguing question.

Why, over 70 years of space exploration (development) by the efforts of all mankind, this space is still not being mastered (developed) in any way?

Because it is too expensive and difficult, obviously.

Of all the objects in the celestial sphere, all "stars" and "planets" for some reason are one to one + - brightness.

What are you trying to say, that makes no sense.

Only the Sun and the Moon stand out with the same angular dimensions (the dimensions are proportional to the distances to the Earth) and the same axial rotation periods - 27 days.

That's not true.  Of course all your claims are nonsense, so...

[Just thinking]

Why, over 70 years of space exploration (development) by the efforts of all mankind, this space is still not being mastered (developed) in any way?

How can we master space Thin air is good to live in but what can we do with the vacuum of space I know nothing.

[AlexandrKushnirtshuk (OP)]

Two huge diametrically opposite formations on the surface of the Earth's core (Earth Blobs). Both are displaced eastward. The larger Earth Blob (under Africa) corresponds to the continents of Praeurasia (Africa, Eurasia, Australia), which are displaced from it to the east. The smaller Earth Blob (under the Pacific Ocean) corresponds to the continents of PreAmerica (North America, South America, Antarctica), which are displaced from it to the east. To the east (near) of Eurasia there is a huge trace from the Sun (shifted to the east) on the surface, and the tectonic plate completely repeats the outline of this trace (PHILIPPINE PLATE). Near the Americas, there are huge traces of the Moon (displaced to the east) on the surface, and tectonic plates completely repeating the outlines of these tracks (COCOS PLATE, CARRIBEAN PLATE and SCOTIA PLATE).


The Unsolved Mystery of the Earth Blobs



All these facts cannot be coincidences. These are patterns that testify to this.


(ProtoEarth, Sun, Moon, Mercury, Venus, Mars; common center of mass between Earth and Sun; distance to the Moon is about 100 000 km., distance to the Sun is about 300 000 km.; Moon diameter is about 800-1000 kilometers, Sun diameter is about 2500-3000 kilometers; Oort Cloud is the border of the Universe where all the "stars" and "galaxies" located - formed from the ProtoEarth's mantle (core) with diameters about tens of kilometers; the diameter of the Universe does not exceed one light minute)

[Just thinking]

the diameter of the Universe does not exceed one light minute)

How do you explain the craft that has gone to Mars and the time delay to control the craft and how do you know that a light second is true if you don't believe the science. You believe in one light minute what if science is telling a lie about the speed of light?

[Kryptid]

The existence of the aether may have already been proven experimentally.

The aether has not yet been officeally proven.

Right...

These traces on the surface of the Earth are a fact.

It's also a fact that the Sun coming into contact with the Earth would destroy the Earth, whereas the Moon coming into contact with the Earth would destroy the Moon (and make the Earth molten). Since both the Earth and the Moon still exist, we know that no such thing ever happened.

[Bored chemist]

All these facts cannot be coincidences.

Why not?
Mind you, half your "facts" are not true.

[Just thinking]

My very dear friend are you saying that science over the past 500 years is a conspiracy. Are we to believe that you are the truth and all others are not to be believed. Please come down to earth and we can have a real discussion. PS can you please send me some of those mushrooms that you have they must be very good.

[The Spoon]

Now the new model of the Universe is known in 1) Singapore, 2) Thailand, 3) NASA and 4) Russian Police.

So you have been spamming other places with your nonsense then - and in most cases had it swiftly removed?