The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. Is the Energy of an Electron negative?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Is the Energy of an Electron negative?

  • 3 Replies
  • 1653 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline talanum1 (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 775
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 5 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Is the Energy of an Electron negative?
« on: 05/02/2021 19:13:28 »
We have:

E = QV = eV.

since the electric charge of an electron is negative, shouldn't this give negative energy?
Logged
 



Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 8082
  • Activity:
    1.5%
  • Thanked: 514 times
Re: Is the Energy of an Electron negative?
« Reply #1 on: 05/02/2021 19:26:37 »
Where did you get that equation from?
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    11.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Is the Energy of an Electron negative?
« Reply #2 on: 05/02/2021 19:37:10 »
For the sake of discussion, we might assume he got it from here:
"Historically, the electronvolt was devised as a standard unit of measure through its usefulness in electrostatic particle accelerator sciences, because a particle with electric charge q has an energy E = qV after passing through the potential V"
On this page
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronvolt

or somewhere similar.
The equation is fine.
It's just that he hasn't realised that in general V=0 (on average) and so E= 0
(whether you consider a positive or a negative charge.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline Hayseed

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 350
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 11 times
  • Naked Science Forum Crackpot
Re: Is the Energy of an Electron negative?
« Reply #3 on: 05/02/2021 22:15:35 »
When men first started to play with charge(Ben and others), they called one charge +, positive and the other charge -, negative.  They even gave the neg and pos charges a direction......out for pos, in for neg.

Of course, we know that both fields move and travel out from the charge and both energies are positive energies.

Now we know(some know) the charges are not positive and negative......they are Left handed and Right handed charges.

This understanding is necessary to understand the asymmetric relationship between the two.

Of which modern science is un-aware.  And causes electrons to have a large circumference and slow rotation, with a low energy personality, and the proton to have a small circumference and a fast rotation, giving it a high energy personality.

e is the only constant in this universe.  Not c.  And of course we base everything on the wrong constant.

Get a balloon and an electroscope.   Blow balloon up and charge it.  Position the scope for a half scale reading.  Slowly, let air out of balloon.   Watch scope.   What does the scope do?  We did not add any charge to balloon.  The balloon size set the field density.  So, we can increase density without adding charge.   Particles work in this fashion.  This is how electrons and protons are the same thing, but have different energy profiles.  Personalities.

 
Logged
The proper hardware will eliminate all theory.
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.346 seconds with 35 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.