0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
If an object moving through space experiences time dilation how would gravity waves effect it?
You can't seemingly have a gravity wave if you have time dilation.
The electron shell could be a result of the gravity field of the nucleus.
The electron shell allows for light of a certain amount to fill it at all times.
Quote from: trevorjohnson32 on Today at 20:35:33You can't seemingly have a gravity wave if you have time dilation.How do you figure?
Because it is impossible for light to enter the nucleus
the electron shell, which is of the same density as light
light can't fight into the denser regions of the gravity field
so it bounces off but gets stuck bouncing back and forth creating an electron.
Evidence?
Kryptid it makes perfect sense
the gravity field is a density on space due to it being a singularity
the light wants to travel to less dense regions of the medium
when those two density's are the same the light tries to escape
it's held in a stationairy position for so long that it begins to resemble a particle when it leaves the atom.
Quote from: trevorjohnson32 on 22/02/2021 22:08:36Kryptid it makes perfect senseSo then where is the evidence?Quote from: trevorjohnson32 on 22/02/2021 22:08:36the gravity field is a density on space due to it being a singularityPlease back this statement up with a reputable source.Quote from: trevorjohnson32 on 22/02/2021 22:08:36the light wants to travel to less dense regions of the mediumPlease back this statement up with a reputable source.Quote from: trevorjohnson32 on 22/02/2021 22:08:36when those two density's are the same the light tries to escapePlease back this statement up with a reputable source.Quote from: trevorjohnson32 on 22/02/2021 22:08:36it's held in a stationairy position for so long that it begins to resemble a particle when it leaves the atom.Please back this statement up with a reputable source.
Is observation not evidence?
So we know that you are wrong.I am curious; what observation(s) did you think you had made?
Quote from: trevorjohnson32 on 26/02/2021 19:55:17Is observation not evidence?Please post a reference to a reputable source to the observations in question.
You probably think that describing the 2D bending of the sheet is the correct view as well don't you?
Well how do you justify yourself saying bending is gravity when it's not?
You bloody English!
Just like magic gravity waves that are the only thing I know about general relativity.
They must be weird misfiring neurons that hurt when you just mindlessly take on GR as belief system.
Please post a reference to a reputable source to the observations in question.
It isn't a belief system. It's a theory that is superbly well-supported by every experiment that has tested it.By the way, why did you ignore this?
Quote from: Kryptid on 26/02/2021 20:54:58It isn't a belief system. It's a theory that is superbly well-supported by every experiment that has tested it.By the way, why did you ignore this?//www.youtube.com/watch?v=kYXXinW_w7w
That's neither an observation nor from a reputable source, so it does not fulfill my request
It's the top view of the professor's experiment.
Sorry, light isn't a wave and gravity is magic.
that think there are answers to the paradoxes of general relativity,
That's neither an observation nor from a reputable source, so it does not fulfill my request.
If you think there are paradoxes in General relativity(1) what are they and(2) do you really think that you would be the first one to notice them?