[Bored chemist]

This is not thinking

[Kryptid]

No a hole such that there is no spacetime or anything else in the hole: a boundary to the Universe.

Such a concept of a hole in space doesn't make any logical sense. A hole has a diameter, which means that there must be space inside of the hole.

12 hours.

That is a time, not a size.

[talanum1 (OP)]

Such a concept of a hole in space doesn't make any logical sense. A hole has a diameter, which means that there must be space inside of the hole.

It's not supposed to make logical sense: your logic was learned in spacetime. It has no diameter and it isn't 3 dimensional and it doesn't have an inside.

[Kryptid]

It's not supposed to make logical sense

Then what was your point?

It has no diameter and it isn't 3 dimensional and it doesn't have an inside.

If you could make a hole in space, the laws of physics would be violated in the hole.

Now you're contradicting yourself. Does it have an inside or not?

If it doesn't, then it isn't a hole.

[Bored chemist]

It's not supposed to make logical sense:

Then it is on the wrong forum, and it's time to close the thread.

Apart from anything else the question has been answered. (Unless anyone can show why this is wrong).

"What is the size of the mechanism enforcing the Laws of Physics?"
The same size as Thursday.

[talanum1 (OP)]

Then what was your point?

Point is it is an object not described by logic developed in the Universe.

Now you're contradicting yourself.

Yes, I naively used the logic of the Universe on it illegally. It hasn't got an inside.

[set fair]

Twelve and a half.

[Kryptid]

Point is it is an object not described by logic developed in the Universe.

So what relevance does it have to the world we live in?

Yes, I naively used the logic of the Universe on it illegally. It hasn't got an inside.

Then it isn't a hole.

[Bored chemist]

Point is it is an object not described by logic developed in the Universe.

Then there's nothing to talk about.