0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Although it is tempting to believe in such a scenario it does not fit in with facts as they are known.
Together with this effect the electrons also move in a return to the ping pong theory, t
Proof of this is that the mean free path is equal to the drift velocity of the electron.
Bored Chemist said:” Please show the counter-example.”
Bored Chemist said: “That can not be true..The units are wrong.I stopped reading there.
Bored Chemist said: “So, as usual, you are saying things that are wrong.That probably results from your not having learned what is right.”
This is purportedly a forum for New Theories, I can understand that some pretty zany ideas are posted but to the best of my knowledge, everything I have posted in my thread is factual and confirmed by science. Yet, moderators like Bored Chemist don’t seek to evaluate content they just want to push their own views to the forefront. Here is what I have to say to Bored Chemist.“To Bored Chemist: I don’t know how to say this but to me at least it is by now obvious. You are an internet Troll. Here is the definition: “an Internet troll — “a person whose sole purpose in life is to seek out people to argue with…. over extremely trivial issues.” “This is typically done by posting inflammatory and digressive, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog), with the intent of provoking readers into displaying anger or denigrating their posts. As far as you are concerned it is taken even further, since your sole purpose seems to be to denigrate and belittle my posts, totally ruining the whole point of posting. For instance: Look at this quote: Quote Bored Chemist said:” Please show the counter-example.” Surely an insensitive post when considerable time and effort has been spent in putting forward the ”counter’ as clearly as possible.Quote Bored Chemist said: “That can not be true..The units are wrong.I stopped reading there.I could easily prove that the distance that an electron can travel, namely the drift velocity is equal to the mean free path, also a distance.Quote Bored Chemist said: “So, as usual, you are saying things that are wrong.That probably results from your not having learned what is right.” Every time I post a thread, Bored Chemist is immediately on the scene, policing the site, flaunting his opinion and at the same time ruining the effect of my post. . Is this how a new theory thread is moderated. Bored Chemist. I am asking you? I can understand such an intervention if I had posted my theory in one of the other forums, say 'General Science' or 'Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology' . But that isn't the case. Your sole intention seems to be to prevent any meaningful discussion from taking place. This is wrong. You could for instance wait for someone else to post for a change and then have your say. Just a suggestion.
Every time I post a thread, Bored Chemist is immediately on the scene,
I could easily prove that the distance that an electron can travel, namely the drift velocity is equal to the mean free path,
“an Internet troll — “a person whose sole purpose in life is to seek out people to argue with…. over extremely trivial issues.” “This is typically done by posting inflammatory and digressive, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community
I think you also need to learn about thishttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_state
Go ahead.I will prove that you are wrong.
Firstly, Bored Chemist is not a moderator AFAIK. Secondly, Bored Chemist is a scientist who has every right to contradict falsehoods and misinformation. If your feelings are hurt go and visit a therapist. This is a science forum where ideas will be challenged.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 30/05/2021 14:40:17Go ahead.I will prove that you are wrong.The average distance the electron travels between collisions is called the mean free path l. It is the product of the average speed 〈v〉 and the average time between collisions
Bored Chemist must be a moderator in disguise. This is evident from the frequency of his appearances on here. He's all over the place, popping up far more often than any other ordinary posters.
And the mean free path is not equal to the velocity because one is a distance, and the other is a speed.So you are still wrong.And, since you were relying on that false idea as "proof" of something, you can't say for sure that the thing is true, can youSo, stop going on about me, and fix your mistake.
My intention was to underline the close relationship between the mean free path and the drift velocity.
I think it is common sense and fairly easy to see; that how fast an object is able to travel depends on there being no obstructions in its path.
One can be obtained from the other:
The model for the propagation of an electric current proposed by Gestalt Aether Theory within a wire fits observed phenomena very accurately and precisely,
The theory establishes on a very sound basis that the electromagnetic force both inside and outside the wire is transmitted by photons.
Surely, something that is abstract is not real?
But it is almost impossible to think of more dimensions,
the electromagnetic radiation exists as an abstract mathematical wave function in multiple dimensions. How can this statement be interpreted?
Is such a theory justified
According to the wave function of quantum mechanics this difference should not occur,
The fact that it doesn't do so shows that the present quantum mechanics theory for an electric current is faulty and in need of change.
How can this statement be interpreted?
Gestalt Aether Theory states that electricity is carried neither by electrons nor by an electromagnetic wave but by 'conduction photons'
With the GAT theory it is possible to estimate the number of lines of force from the current flowing in the conductor.
The only request I have is for you to reserve any observations for a while;
I request that you follow the rules of the site which encourage debate; not soapboxing.
I have written clearly and concisely, the reasons that I find existing theories unsatisfactory.
Show your calculations.
Instead of making the claim that I don’t understand what those present theories are, how about giving me your version of how you think a current propagates in a wire.