[Bored chemist]

Marking your own advert as the "best answer" is not actually "cordial".

[Colin2B]

Here is the link of the draft of the future paper related to this subject.

Please note that this site is not for personal advertising as explained in the rules you signed up to.
Discuss topics here please rather than refer to external sites.
Thank you

[Kartazion (OP)]

Please note that this site is not for personal advertising as explained in the rules you signed up to.
Discuss topics here please rather than refer to external sites.
Thank you

I did not know that scientific paper in review on MDPI were not accepted here.

[Origin]

I did not know that scientific paper in review on MDPI were not accepted here.

Now you do.

Your entire thread is nonsense and any paper you wrote that includes this nonsense would never pass peer review.

[Kartazion (OP)]

Now you do.

I did.

Your graph is meaningless.

At least he's consistent.

Sorry my dear @Origin. Where you don't see anything, your friend sees something.

Do you think that there is no connection between matter and antimatter with the Schrodinger's Cat experiment?

That is correct there is no connection.  You realize there is no actual experiment with a cat, right?  Do you also realize that a cat is not a quantum object so it is only alive or dead?

Where I see something you see nothing.

Your entire thread is nonsense and any paper you wrote that includes this nonsense would never pass peer review.

So your amateur opinion doesn't matter to me.

[Bored chemist]

Where I see something you see nothing.

So... you are hallucinating.
Does that trouble you?

[Bored chemist]

So your amateur opinion doesn't matter to me.

My professional opinion is that
(1) he's right and
(2) You are posting nonsense.

Since it's my professional opinion, if you wish to disagree, you need to be professional about it. That means paying me.
And, to be blunt, I'm out of your league; you can't afford me.

[Kartazion (OP)]

So... you are hallucinating.
Does that trouble you?

You, you are... hallucinating and rest. Because I have the source.

Antimatter, which is differentiated by having the opposite charge to normal matter, is composed of the antiparticles of normal matter. Some particles oscillate between being matter and antimatter via superposition, as illustrated by the thought experiment of Schrödinger’s cat. https://interestingengineering.com/science/physicists-observe-particles-switch-between-matter-and-antimatter

I am bored...

My professional opinion is that
(1) he's right and
(2) You are posting nonsense.

Since it's my professional opinion, if you wish to disagree, you need to be professional about it. That means paying me.

It's not nonsense. It's just that you to have a hard time understanding. Look, just the example of the "Hole through the earth" is no nonsense. So why are you denying the facts?

And, to be blunt, I'm out of your league; you can't afford me.

Talk for you.

[Kartazion (OP)]

Either way whether you like it or not I'll be published.

[Bored chemist]

Either way whether you like it or not I'll be published.

The Lord of the Rings was published; that doesn't mean anyone should believe it.

[Kartazion (OP)]

The Lord of the Rings was published; that doesn't mean anyone should believe it.

As you can imagine it's not a small publication that explains a little thing. You can only believe me because everything I explain here is related with the an-harmonic oscillator with solid references.

The chapters listed below may evolve but here is an example:

1. Introduction
2. Perpetual Oscillation & Ideal Distribution of Energies
3. Kinetic Energy & Potential Energy
4. Source of Quantum Fluctuations & Gravitational Singularity
5. Singularity Avoidance & Higgs
6. Second Interpretation of Singularity Avoidance
   6.1. Hawking Radiation
7. Orbit, Inertia, ZPE & Potential Barrier
8. Vacuum Metastability
   8.1. Tunnel Effect
   8.2. Bifurcation
   8.3. Energy Dissociation
   8.4. Ionic Covalent Bonding
9. Graviton & Potential Energy
10. Asymmetry Matter Antimatter
11. Symmetry Breaking CP & Arrow of Time T
12. Path of the Particle, Quantum Fluctuation & Dark Matter
   12.1 Neutrino
13. Dark Energy
14. Quantum Superposition
15. Quantum ChromoDynamics
   15.1. Coupling Constant
   15.2. Asymptotic Freedom
   15.3. Plasma & Quark Confinement
16. Particle Radiation & Boson
17. Atom & Quantum Atom
18. Example Structure & Conclusion
   18.1  Virtual Particle


References:

Spoiler: show

1. Iberê Kuntz; Roberto Casadio; Singularity avoidance in quantum gravity. Physics Letters B 2020,
802, 135219, 10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135219.
2. V Husain; Singularity avoidance, lattices, and quantum gravity. Canadian Journal of Physics 200
8, 86, 583-586, 10.1139/p07-201.
3. J Brunnemann; T Thiemann; On (cosmological) singularity avoidance in loop quantum gravity. Cl
assical and Quantum Gravity 2006, 23, 1395-1427, 10.1088/0264-9381/23/5/001.
4. Andrew J. Simoson; Falling down a Hole through the Earth. Mathematics Magazine 2004, 77, 17
1, 10.2307/3219113.
5. Journey through the center of the Earth . Hyperphysics. Retrieved 2022-7-28
6. The hydrogen atom with an origin centred singularity . ResearchGate. Retrieved 2022-7-28
7. How is Matter Ejected from an Event Horizon Around a Black Hole? . The National Radio Astrono
my Observatory. Retrieved 2022-7-28
8. Don N Page; Hawking radiation and black hole thermodynamics. New Journal of Physics 2005, 7
, 203-203, 10.1088/1367-2630/7/1/203.
9. A Marasco; G Cresci; L Posti; F Fraternali; F Mannucci; A Marconi; F Belfiore; S M Fall; A universal
relation between the properties of supermassive black holes, galaxies, and dark matter haloes.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2021, 507, 4274-4293, 10.1093/mnras/stab2
317.
10. Andrew King; The Supermassive Black Hole—Galaxy Connection. null 2013, 49, 427-451, 10.10
07/978-1-4939-2227-7_21.
11. Luca Fabbri; Black Hole singularity avoidance by the Higgs scalar field. The European Physical Jo
urnal C 2018, 78, 1028, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6505-6.
12. Marcelo Gleiser; Metastability in the early Universe. Physical Review D 1990, 42, 3350-3361, 10
.1103/physrevd.42.3350.
13. Katherine J. Mack; Robert McNees; Bounds on extra dimensions from micro black holes in the co
ntext of the metastable Higgs vacuum. Physical Review D 2019, 99, 063001, 10.1103/physrevd.
99.063001.
14. Itzhak Bars; Paul J. Steinhardt; Neil Turok; Cyclic cosmology, conformal symmetry and the metas
tability of the Higgs. Physics Letters B 2013, 726, 50-55, 10.1016/j.physletb.2013.08.071.
15. Nikolaos Tetradis; Black holes and Higgs stability. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
2016, 2016, 036-036, 10.1088/1475-7516/2016/09/036.
16. Bernhard Haisch; Alfonson Rueda; H.E. Puthoff; Physics of the zero-point field: implications for in
ertia, gravitation and mass. Speculations in Science and Technology 1997, 20, 99-114, 10.1023/
a:1018516704228.
17. E.M Henley; High energy diffractive dissociation of pions and the A1. Annals of Physics 1971, 63
, 541-548, 10.1016/0003-4916(71)90027-3.
18. Krishnanand Sinha; On the oscillator strength and the dissociation energy of CN molecules. Rese
archGate 1986, 1, 1-6, .
19. J. Hussels; N. Hölsch; C.-F. Cheng; E. J. Salumbides; H. L. Bethlem; K. S. E. Eikema; Ch. Jungen; M
. Beyer; F. Merkt; W. Ubachs; et al. Improved ionization and dissociation energies of the deuteriu
m molecule. Physical Review A 2022, 105, 022820, 10.1103/physreva.105.022820.
20. C. H. L. Goodman; Ionic-Covalent Bonding in Crystals. Nature 1960, 187, 590-591, 10.1038/187
590a0.
21. John Bannister Goodenough; First-order changes in ionic/covalent bonding. Ferroelectrics 1992,
130, 77-86, 10.1080/00150199208019535.
22. E.V. Kolontsova; Å.â. Êîëîíöîâ� ; Radiation-induced states in crystals with ionic-covalent bonds. Us
pekhi Fizicheskih Nauk 1987, 151, 149-172, 10.3367/ufnr.0151.198701g.0149.
23. Weizhang Huang; Weishi Liu; Yufei Yu; Permanent charge effects on ionic flow: a numerical study
of flux ratios and their bifurcation. arXiv 2020, 1, 1-31, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2003.112
23.
24. Giulia L. Celora; Matthew G. Hennessy; Andreas Münch; Barbara Wagner; Sarah L. Waters; The d
ynamics of a collapsing polyelectrolyte gel. null 2021, 1, 1-34, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.21
05.06495.
25. M. B. Fröb; C. Rein; R. Verch; Graviton corrections to the Newtonian potential using invariant obs
ervables. Journal of High Energy Physics 2022, 2022, 1-29, 10.1007/jhep01(2022)180.
26. Lintao Tan; Nikolaos Christos Tsamis; Richard Paul Woodard; How Inflationary Gravitons Affect th
e Force of Gravity. Universe 2022, 8, 376, 10.3390/universe8070376.
27. Mark Kowitt; Gravitational repulsion and Dirac antimatter. International Journal of Theoretical Ph
ysics 1996, 35, 605-631, 10.1007/bf02082828.
28. Tong Bor Tang; Li Zhi Fang; The cosmic asymmetry in matter-antimatter. Vistas in Astronomy 19
84, 27, 1-23, 10.1016/0083-6656(84)90010-2.
29. R. L. Jaffe; Casimir effect and the quantum vacuum. Physical Review D 2005, 72, 021301, 10.11
03/physrevd.72.021301.
30. Gilles Cohen-Tannoudji; The de Broglie universal substratum, the Lochak monopoles and the dar
k universe. arXiv 2015, 1, 1-20, 10.48550/arXiv.1507.00460.
31. Four reasons why the quantum vacuum may explain dark matter . PhysOrg.com. Retrieved 2022
-7-28
32. Antonio Capolupo; Quantum Vacuum, Dark Matter, Dark Energy, and Spontaneous Supersymme
try Breaking. Advances in High Energy Physics 2018, 2018, 1-7, 10.1155/2018/9840351.
33. Dragan Slavkov Hajdukovic; Quantum vacuum and dark matter. Astrophysics and Space Science
2011, 337, 9-14, 10.1007/s10509-011-0938-9.
34. Davide Castelvecchi; New type of dark energy could solve Universe expansion mystery. Nature
2021, 1, 1, 10.1038/d41586-021-02531-5.
35. Eric V. Linder; Dark Energy, Expansion History of the Universe, and SNAP. PROCEEDINGS OF THE
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE “PHYSICAL MESOMECHANICS. MATERIALS WITH MULTILEVEL HIER
ARCHICAL STRUCTURE AND INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY” 2003, 655, 193-207,
10.1063/1.1543500.
36. Jacob Schaf; dark energy expansion. Universal Journal of Physics and Application 2015, 9, 182-1
87, 10.13189/ujpa.2015.090403.
37. Dragan Huterer; David Kirkby; Rachel Bean; Andrew Connolly; Kyle Dawson; Scott Dodelson; Au
gust Evrard; Bhuvnesh Jain; Michael Jarvis; Eric Linder; et al. Growth of cosmic structure: Probin
g dark energy beyond expansion. Astroparticle Physics 2014, 63, 23-41, 10.1016/j.astropartphy
s.2014.07.004.
38. Gang Xin; Peng Wang; Exploring superposition state in multi-scale quantum harmonic oscillator
algorithm. Applied Soft Computing 2021, 107, 107398, 10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107398.
39. Eva Zakka-Bajjani; François Nguyen; Minhyea Lee; Leila R. Vale; Raymond W. Simmonds; Jose Au
mentado; Quantum superposition of a single microwave photon in two different ’colour’ states.
Nature Physics 2011, 7, 599-603, 10.1038/nphys2035.
40. Martin J. Renner; Časlav Brukner; Computational Advantage from a Quantum Superposition of Q
ubit Gate Orders. Physical Review Letters 2022, 128, 230503, 10.1103/physrevlett.128.230503.
41. P. A. Cook; Meson coupling constants in a quark model. Il Nuovo Cimento A Series 10 1967, 48,
570-572, 10.1007/bf02818032.
42. Fujio Takagi; Meson-Baryon Coupling Constants in the Quark Model. Progress of Theoretical Phys
ics 1967, 37, 1047-1048, 10.1143/ptp.37.1047.
43. E. M. Henley; T. Oka; J. D. Vergados; Meson-nucleon coupling constants in a quark model. Few-B
ody Systems 1990, 9, 75-87, 10.1007/bf01091699.
44. R. Brout; From asymptotic freedom to quark confinement. Nuclear Physics B 1988, 310, 127-14
0, 10.1016/0550-3213(88)90057-0.
45. Kei-Ichi Kondo; Abelian-Projected Effective Gauge Theory of QCD with Asymptotic Freedom and
Quark Confinement. Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement 1998, 131, 243-255,
10.1143/ptps.131.243.
46. Kanako Yamazaki; T. Matsui; Gordon Baym; Entropy in the quark–hadron transition. Nuclear Phys
ics A 2015, 933, 245-255, 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2014.10.046.
47. David Dudal; Subhash Mahapatra; Thermal entropy of a quark-antiquark pair above and below d
econfinement from a dynamical holographic QCD model. Physical Review D 2017, 96, 126010,
10.1103/physrevd.96.126010.
48. Tri Quoc Truong; Tadashi Tsubone; Munehisa Sekikawa; Naohiko Inaba; Border-collision bifurcatio
ns and Arnol’d tongues in two coupled piecewise-constant oscillators. Physica D: Nonlinear Phen
omena 2019, 401, 132148, 10.1016/j.physd.2019.132148.
49. D Gabor; Plasma oscillations. British Journal of Applied Physics 1951, 2, 209-218, 10.1088/0508-
3443/2/8/301.
50. Toshio Nakayama; Irreversibility in Plasmas: Entropy Production. Progress of Theoretical Physics
1974, 51, 77-81, 10.1143/ptp.51.77.
51. Ettore Minardi; Minardi, E. Thermodynamics of High Temperature Plasmas. Entropy, 2009, 11, 1
24-221. Entropy 2009, 11, 457-462, 10.3390/e11030457.
52. R. Shankar; Determination of the quark-gluon coupling constant. Physical Review D 1977, 15, 7
55-758, 10.1103/physrevd.15.755.
53. M. A. Braun; Reggeized gluons with a running coupling constant. Physics Letters B 1995, 348, 1
90-195, 10.1016/0370-2693(95)00101-p.
54. M. Althoff; W. Braunschweig; F.J. Kirschfink; K. Lübelsmeyer; H.-U. Martyn; J. Rimkus; P. Rosskam
p; H.G. Sander; D. Schmitz; H. Siebke; et al. Experimental test of the flavor independence of the
quark-gluon coupling constant. Physics Letters B 1984, 138, 317-324, 10.1016/0370-2693(84)9
1668-x.
55. Lawrence Slifkin; Entropy and the Frequency of a Harmonic Oscillator. American Journal of Physi
cs 1965, 33, 408-408, 10.1119/1.1971569.
56. N. Fornengo; C. Giunti; C.W. Kim; J. Song; Gravitational effects on the neutrino oscillation in vacu
um. Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements 1999, 70, 264-266, 10.1016/s0920-5632(98)
00435-6.
57. Quantum Field and 2nd Quantization (2021 Edition) . universe-review.ca. Retrieved 2022-7-29
58. Damiano Anselmi; Purely Virtual Particles in Quantum Gravity, Inflationary Cosmology and Collid
er Physics. Symmetry 2022, 14, 521, 10.3390/sym14030521.
59. Janne Mikael Karimäki; Virtual Particle Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics - a non-dualistic mo
del of QM with a natural probability interpretation. arXiv 2012, 1, 1-8, 10.48550/arXiv.1206.123
7.

[Kartazion (OP)]

Here is a short summary of this thread. The references stated are not placed like that by chance, and have been carefully chosen.




References:

Spoiler: show

1. John. D. Barrow; Mariusz. P. Dabrowski; Oscillating universes. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astro
nomical Society 1995, 275, 850-862, 10.1093/mnras/275.3.850.
2. Yun-Song Piao; Yuan-Zhong Zhang; Inflation in oscillating universe. Nuclear Physics B 2005, 725
, 265-274, 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.07.021.
3. Itzhak Goldman; Nathan Rosen; Gravitation Theory and Oscillating Universe. Physical Review D
1972, 5, 1285-1287, 10.1103/physrevd.5.1285.
4. Roy A. Briere; LHCb Collaboration; Observing Matter-Antimatter Oscillations. Physics 2013, 6, 1-
3, 10.1103/physics.6.26.
5. M.K. Parida; Natural mass scales for observable matter-antimatter oscillations in SO(10). Physics
Letters B 1983, 126, 220-224, 10.1016/0370-2693(83)90594-4.
6. Iberê Kuntz; Roberto Casadio; Singularity avoidance in quantum gravity. Physics Letters B 2020,
802, 135219, 10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135219.
7. V Husain; Singularity avoidance, lattices, and quantum gravity. Canadian Journal of Physics 200
8, 86, 583-586, 10.1139/p07-201.
8. J Brunnemann; T Thiemann; On (cosmological) singularity avoidance in loop quantum gravity. Cl
assical and Quantum Gravity 2006, 23, 1395-1427, 10.1088/0264-9381/23/5/001.
9. Andrew J. Simoson; Falling down a Hole through the Earth. Mathematics Magazine 2004, 77, 17
1, 10.2307/3219113.
10. Journey through the center of the Earth . Hyperphysics. Retrieved 2022-7-28
11. C. A. Coulson; R. P. Bell; Kinetic energy, potential energy and force in molecule formation. Trans.
Faraday Soc. 1945, 41, 141-149, 10.1039/tf9454100141.
12. Robert C. Hilborn; Galilean Transformations of Kinetic Energy, Work, and Potential Energy. The P
hysics Teacher 2019, 57, 40-43, 10.1119/1.5084927.
13. William D. Harkins; The Change of Molecular Kinetic Energy into Molecular Potential Energy. Pro
ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 1919, 5, 539-546, 10.1073/pnas.5.12.539.
14. R. H. Schwendeman; Comparison of Experimentally Derived and Theoretically Calculated Deriva
tives of the Energy, Kinetic Energy, and Potential Energy for CO. The Journal of Chemical Physics
1966, 44, 2115-2119, 10.1063/1.1726989.
15. R. F. Snider; Conversion between kinetic energy and potential energy in the classical nonlocal Bo
ltzmann equation. Journal of Statistical Physics 1995, 80, 1085-1117, 10.1007/bf02179865.
16. Rory O. Rafi Y. Thompson; Efficiency of conversion of kinetic energy to potential energy by a bre
aking internal gravity wave. Journal of Geophysical Research 1980, 85, 6631,
10.1029/jc085ic11p06631.
17. Timothy H Boyer; Quantum zero-point energy and long-range forces. Annals of Physics 1970, 5
6, 474-503, 10.1016/0003-4916(70)90027-8.
18. Hristu Culetu; The zero point energy and gravitation. arXiv 2004, 1, 1-18, 10.48550/arXiv.hep-t
h/0410133.
19. Jevgenijs Kaupuzs; Energy fluctuations and the singularity of specific heat in a 3D Ising model. S
econd International Symposium on Fluctuations and Noise 2004, 1, 480-491, 10.1117/12.54649
3.
20. John D. Barrow; Robert J. Scherrer; Constraining density fluctuations with big bang nucleosynthe
sis in the era of precision cosmology. Physical Review D 2018, 98, 043534,
10.1103/physrevd.98.043534.
21. M. Giovannini; M. E. Shaposhnikov; Primordial Magnetic Fields, Anomalous Matter-Antimatter Flu
ctuations, and Big Bang Nucleosynthesis. Physical Review Letters 1998, 80, 22-25, 10.1103/phy
srevlett.80.22.
22. Kouji Nakamura; Shigelu Konno; Yoshimi Oshiro; Akira Tomimatsu; Quantum Fluctuations of Blac
k Hole Geometry. Progress of Theoretical Physics 1993, 90, 861-870, 10.1143/ptp.90.861.
23. Jianwei Mei; Fluctuating black hole horizons. Journal of High Energy Physics 2013, 2013, 195, 1
0.1007/jhep10(2013)195.
24. Tomohiro Takahashi; Jiro Soda; Hawking radiation from fluctuating black holes. Classical and Qu
antum Gravity 2010, 27, 1-35, 10.1088/0264-9381/27/17/175008.
25. The hydrogen atom with an origin centred singularity . ResearchGate. Retrieved 2022-7-28
26. How is Matter Ejected from an Event Horizon Around a Black Hole? . The National Radio Astrono
my Observatory. Retrieved 2022-7-28
27. Don N Page; Hawking radiation and black hole thermodynamics. New Journal of Physics 2005, 7
, 203-203, 10.1088/1367-2630/7/1/203.
28. Gilad Gour; A J M Medved; Thermal fluctuations and black-hole entropy. Classical and Quantum
Gravity 2003, 20, 3307-3326, 10.1088/0264-9381/20/15/303.
29. A Marasco; G Cresci; L Posti; F Fraternali; F Mannucci; A Marconi; F Belfiore; S M Fall; A universal
relation between the properties of supermassive black holes, galaxies, and dark matter haloes.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2021, 507, 4274-4293, 10.1093/mnras/stab2
317.
30. Andrew King; The Supermassive Black Hole—Galaxy Connection. null 2013, 49, 427-451, 10.10
07/978-1-4939-2227-7_21.
31. Luca Fabbri; Black Hole singularity avoidance by the Higgs scalar field. The European Physical Jo
urnal C 2018, 78, 1028, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6505-6.
32. Marcelo Gleiser; Metastability in the early Universe. Physical Review D 1990, 42, 3350-3361, 10
.1103/physrevd.42.3350.
33. Katherine J. Mack; Robert McNees; Bounds on extra dimensions from micro black holes in the co
ntext of the metastable Higgs vacuum. Physical Review D 2019, 99, 063001, 10.1103/physrevd.
99.063001.
34. Itzhak Bars; Paul J. Steinhardt; Neil Turok; Cyclic cosmology, conformal symmetry and the metas
tability of the Higgs. Physics Letters B 2013, 726, 50-55, 10.1016/j.physletb.2013.08.071.
35. Nikolaos Tetradis; Black holes and Higgs stability. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
2016, 2016, 036-036, 10.1088/1475-7516/2016/09/036.
36. Bernhard Haisch; Alfonson Rueda; H.E. Puthoff; Physics of the zero-point field: implications for in
ertia, gravitation and mass. Speculations in Science and Technology 1997, 20, 99-114, 10.1023/
a:1018516704228.
37. Bo Song; Shovan Dutta; Shaurya Bhave; Jr-Chiun Yu; Edward Carter; Nigel Cooper; Ulrich Schnei
der; Realizing discontinuous quantum phase transitions in a strongly correlated driven optical la
ttice. Nature Physics 2022, 18, 259-264, 10.1038/s41567-021-01476-w.
38. Are We on the Brink of the Higgs Abyss? . Physcis. Retrieved 2022-7-31
39. E.M Henley; High energy diffractive dissociation of pions and the A1. Annals of Physics 1971, 63
, 541-548, 10.1016/0003-4916(71)90027-3.
40. Krishnanand Sinha; On the oscillator strength and the dissociation energy of CN molecules. Rese
archGate 1986, 1, 1-6, .
41. J. Hussels; N. Hölsch; C.-F. Cheng; E. J. Salumbides; H. L. Bethlem; K. S. E. Eikema; Ch. Jungen; M
. Beyer; F. Merkt; W. Ubachs; et al. Improved ionization and dissociation energies of the deuteriu
m molecule. Physical Review A 2022, 105, 022820, 10.1103/physreva.105.022820.
42. C. H. L. Goodman; Ionic-Covalent Bonding in Crystals. Nature 1960, 187, 590-591, 10.1038/187
590a0.
43. John Bannister Goodenough; First-order changes in ionic/covalent bonding. Ferroelectrics 1992,
130, 77-86, 10.1080/00150199208019535.
44. E.V. Kolontsova; Å.â. Êîëîíöîâ� ; Radiation-induced states in crystals with ionic-covalent bonds. Us
pekhi Fizicheskih Nauk 1987, 151, 149-172, 10.3367/ufnr.0151.198701g.0149.
45. Weizhang Huang; Weishi Liu; Yufei Yu; Permanent charge effects on ionic flow: a numerical study
of flux ratios and their bifurcation. arXiv 2020, 1, 1-31, 10.48550/arXiv.2003.11223.
46. Giulia L. Celora; Matthew G. Hennessy; Andreas Münch; Barbara Wagner; Sarah L. Waters; The d
ynamics of a collapsing polyelectrolyte gel. null 2021, 1, 1-34, 10.48550/arXiv.2105.06495.
47. M. B. Fröb; C. Rein; R. Verch; Graviton corrections to the Newtonian potential using invariant obs
ervables. Journal of High Energy Physics 2022, 2022, 1-29, 10.1007/jhep01(2022)180.
48. Lintao Tan; Nikolaos Christos Tsamis; Richard Paul Woodard; How Inflationary Gravitons Affect th
e Force of Gravity. Universe 2022, 8, 376, 10.3390/universe8070376.
49. Mark Kowitt; Gravitational repulsion and Dirac antimatter. International Journal of Theoretical Ph
ysics 1996, 35, 605-631, 10.1007/bf02082828.
50. Tong Bor Tang; Li Zhi Fang; The cosmic asymmetry in matter-antimatter. Vistas in Astronomy 19
84, 27, 1-23, 10.1016/0083-6656(84)90010-2.
51. Anonymous; Universe Preceded by an Antiuniverse?. Physics 2018, 11, 1,
10.1103/physics.11.s147.
52. S.J. Robles-Pérez; Quantum Creation of a Universe–Antiuniverse Pair. Acta Physica Polonica B Pro
ceedings Supplement 2020, 13, 1-7, 10.5506/aphyspolbsupp.13.325.
53. R. L. Jaffe; Casimir effect and the quantum vacuum. Physical Review D 2005, 72, 021301, 10.11
03/physrevd.72.021301.
54. Gilles Cohen-Tannoudji; The de Broglie universal substratum, the Lochak monopoles and the dar
k universe. arXiv 2015, 1, 1-20, 10.48550/arXiv.1507.00460.
55. Four reasons why the quantum vacuum may explain dark matter . PhysOrg.com. Retrieved 2022
-7-28
56. Antonio Capolupo; Quantum Vacuum, Dark Matter, Dark Energy, and Spontaneous Supersymme
try Breaking. Advances in High Energy Physics 2018, 2018, 1-7, 10.1155/2018/9840351.
57. Dragan Slavkov Hajdukovic; Quantum vacuum and dark matter. Astrophysics and Space Science
2011, 337, 9-14, 10.1007/s10509-011-0938-9.
58. Davide Castelvecchi; New type of dark energy could solve Universe expansion mystery. Nature
2021, 1, 1, 10.1038/d41586-021-02531-5.
59. Eric V. Linder; Dark Energy, Expansion History of the Universe, and SNAP. PROCEEDINGS OF THE
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE “PHYSICAL MESOMECHANICS. MATERIALS WITH MULTILEVEL HIER
ARCHICAL STRUCTURE AND INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY” 2003, 655, 193-207,
10.1063/1.1543500.
60. Jacob Schaf; dark energy expansion. Universal Journal of Physics and Application 2015, 9, 182-1
87, 10.13189/ujpa.2015.090403.
61. Dragan Huterer; David Kirkby; Rachel Bean; Andrew Connolly; Kyle Dawson; Scott Dodelson; Au
gust Evrard; Bhuvnesh Jain; Michael Jarvis; Eric Linder; et al. Growth of cosmic structure: Probin
g dark energy beyond expansion. Astroparticle Physics 2014, 63, 23-41, 10.1016/j.astropartphy
s.2014.07.004.
62. Gang Xin; Peng Wang; Exploring superposition state in multi-scale quantum harmonic oscillator
algorithm. Applied Soft Computing 2021, 107, 107398, 10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107398.
63. Eva Zakka-Bajjani; François Nguyen; Minhyea Lee; Leila R. Vale; Raymond W. Simmonds; Jose Au
mentado; Quantum superposition of a single microwave photon in two different ’colour’ states.
Nature Physics 2011, 7, 599-603, 10.1038/nphys2035.
64. Martin J. Renner; Časlav Brukner; Computational Advantage from a Quantum Superposition of Q
ubit Gate Orders. Physical Review Letters 2022, 128, 230503, 10.1103/physrevlett.128.230503.
65. P. A. Cook; Meson coupling constants in a quark model. Il Nuovo Cimento A Series 10 1967, 48,
570-572, 10.1007/bf02818032.
66. Fujio Takagi; Meson-Baryon Coupling Constants in the Quark Model. Progress of Theoretical Phys
ics 1967, 37, 1047-1048, 10.1143/ptp.37.1047.
67. E. M. Henley; T. Oka; J. D. Vergados; Meson-nucleon coupling constants in a quark model. Few-B
ody Systems 1990, 9, 75-87, 10.1007/bf01091699.
68. R. Brout; From asymptotic freedom to quark confinement. Nuclear Physics B 1988, 310, 127-14
0, 10.1016/0550-3213(88)90057-0.
69. Kei-Ichi Kondo; Abelian-Projected Effective Gauge Theory of QCD with Asymptotic Freedom and
Quark Confinement. Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement 1998, 131, 243-255,
10.1143/ptps.131.243.
70. Kanako Yamazaki; T. Matsui; Gordon Baym; Entropy in the quark–hadron transition. Nuclear Phys
ics A 2015, 933, 245-255, 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2014.10.046.
71. David Dudal; Subhash Mahapatra; Thermal entropy of a quark-antiquark pair above and below d
econfinement from a dynamical holographic QCD model. Physical Review D 2017, 96, 126010,
10.1103/physrevd.96.126010.
72. Tri Quoc Truong; Tadashi Tsubone; Munehisa Sekikawa; Naohiko Inaba; Border-collision bifurcatio
ns and Arnol’d tongues in two coupled piecewise-constant oscillators. Physica D: Nonlinear Phen
omena 2019, 401, 132148, 10.1016/j.physd.2019.132148.
73. D Gabor; Plasma oscillations. British Journal of Applied Physics 1951, 2, 209-218, 10.1088/0508-
3443/2/8/301.
74. Toshio Nakayama; Irreversibility in Plasmas: Entropy Production. Progress of Theoretical Physics
1974, 51, 77-81, 10.1143/ptp.51.77.
75. Ettore Minardi; Minardi, E. Thermodynamics of High Temperature Plasmas. Entropy, 2009, 11, 1
24-221. Entropy 2009, 11, 457-462, 10.3390/e11030457.
76. R. Shankar; Determination of the quark-gluon coupling constant. Physical Review D 1977, 15, 7
55-758, 10.1103/physrevd.15.755.
77. M. A. Braun; Reggeized gluons with a running coupling constant. Physics Letters B 1995, 348, 1
90-195, 10.1016/0370-2693(95)00101-p.
78. M. Althoff; W. Braunschweig; F.J. Kirschfink; K. Lübelsmeyer; H.-U. Martyn; J. Rimkus; P. Rosskam
p; H.G. Sander; D. Schmitz; H. Siebke; et al. Experimental test of the flavor independence of the
quark-gluon coupling constant. Physics Letters B 1984, 138, 317-324, 10.1016/0370-2693(84)9
1668-x.
79. Lawrence Slifkin; Entropy and the Frequency of a Harmonic Oscillator. American Journal of Physi
cs 1965, 33, 408-408, 10.1119/1.1971569.
80. N. Fornengo; C. Giunti; C.W. Kim; J. Song; Gravitational effects on the neutrino oscillation in vacu
um. Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements 1999, 70, 264-266, 10.1016/s0920-5632(98)
00435-6.
81. Quantum Field and 2nd Quantization (2021 Edition) . universe-review.ca. Retrieved 2022-7-29
82. Anharmonic Oscillator . GitHub. Retrieved 2022-8-2
83. Damiano Anselmi; Purely Virtual Particles in Quantum Gravity, Inflationary Cosmology and Collid
er Physics. Symmetry 2022, 14, 521, 10.3390/sym14030521.
84. Janne Mikael Karimäki; Virtual Particle Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics - a non-dualistic mo
del of QM with a natural probability interpretation. arXiv 2012, 1, 1-8, 10.48550/arXiv.1206.123
7.

[Kartazion (OP)]

New. You can find me on https://encyclopedia.pub/

[Astralisys]

To run water from the mountains, does it take energy?

[Kartazion (OP)]

To run water from the mountains, does it take energy?

It is Potential Energy. Through the Potential Energy is given the Kinetic Energy by its momentum.

You said exactly what I already wrote:

To run water from the mountains, does it take energy?

Please open your own thread on this. Thanks.