The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. Is Gravity Light?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Is Gravity Light?

  • 7 Replies
  • 1748 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline talanum1 (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 775
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 5 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Is Gravity Light?
« on: 29/01/2022 14:10:37 »
It was detected that gravity moves at the speed of light. Not so long ago Electromagnetic waves was found to move at the speed of light and it was concluded that therefore Electromagnetic waves = light.

Now we have other radiation moving at the speed of light. So shouldn't it be re-evaluated to conclude gravity = light?
Logged
 



Offline Kartazion

  • ⛨ Knight ⚔
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 555
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 10 times
  • Quantum Mechanics
    • Advertise and be banned
Re: Is Gravity Light?
« Reply #1 on: 29/01/2022 14:36:58 »
Artificial light attracts bugs but not matter. And with natural light when measuring weight on earth would not have the same value at night as during the day.
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    11.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Is Gravity Light?
« Reply #2 on: 29/01/2022 14:55:51 »
Quote from: talanum1 on 29/01/2022 14:10:37
So shouldn't it be re-evaluated to conclude gravity = light?
Well... sort of.
But the reevaluation shouldn't take long.
Does gravity still exist in the dark?
Yes, it does.
Does light still exist in the dark?
No it doesn't
So light is not the same as gravity.

OK, that's the reevaluation finished.

The question now is "how come you didn't realise that for yourself?".
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline Origin

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2248
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 210 times
  • Nothing of importance
Re: Is Gravity Light?
« Reply #3 on: 29/01/2022 15:12:35 »
Quote from: talanum1 on 29/01/2022 14:10:37
So shouldn't it be re-evaluated to conclude gravity = light?
What?!  No, just no.
Logged
 

Offline puppypower

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1652
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 125 times
Re: Is Gravity Light?
« Reply #4 on: 29/01/2022 18:25:44 »
Quote from: talanum1 on 29/01/2022 14:10:37
It was detected that gravity moves at the speed of light. Not so long ago Electromagnetic waves was found to move at the speed of light and it was concluded that therefore Electromagnetic waves = light.

Now we have other radiation moving at the speed of light. So shouldn't it be re-evaluated to conclude gravity = light?

Gravity has other properties that can shed insight. For example, mass and gravity causes local space-time to contract via General Relativity. If we were in a space ship that was moving with increasing velocity, space-time will also contract; Special Relativity.

What this tells me is gravity is designed to move matter in the general direction of the speed of light reference since as matter collects, space-time contracts more and more. The black hole approximates this final goal. Gravity is not so much light, as it tries to push matter back to the speed of light reference of light. Mass burn, due to gravity induced pressure and nuclear fusion, does this directly when it turns mass into energy; photons. There is a quantum jump from the inertial frame of mass, to the speed of light frame of photons.

The universe formed from a speed of light reference and is heading back with all roads leading to this path. The forces of nature, by all giving off energy when potential lowers turns inertial affects into speed of light affects.

An interesting affect is the universal red shift. The red shift makes wavelength longer but frequency gets slower. The time aspect appears to be based on space-time contraction while the distance aspect is based on space-time expansion. Since time is the dynamic variable; clock,  and distance is the passive variable; meter stick, the expansion is being led by time contracting back to infinite wavelength and zero frequency. This is the speed of light time reference but inertial distance reference. Light is the bridge between the speed of light and inertial references with gravity moving things along that bridge.
Logged
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    11.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Is Gravity Light?
« Reply #5 on: 29/01/2022 19:11:29 »
Quote from: puppypower on 29/01/2022 18:25:44
What this tells me is gravity is designed
Who is the designer?
Do you realise this is a science page?
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 11035
  • Activity:
    9%
  • Thanked: 1486 times
Re: Is Gravity Light?
« Reply #6 on: 30/01/2022 04:42:31 »
Quote from: OP
It was detected that gravity moves at the speed of light.
True, LIGO and optical telescopes detected the same neutron-star collision within hours of each other: So they travel at pretty much the same speed.

But this merely provided confirmation of the predictions of Einstein's General Theory of Relativity, a century before: that gravity and light would travel at exactly the same speed.
- You can have waves in any medium, whether that be water, guitar strings, organ pipes, the electromagnetic field (light/radio waves) and spacetime (gravity waves)
- But this does not mean that they are all the same thing

We have subsequently realised that the universe has a quantum nature.
- Light is carried by photons, a Spin=1 massless particle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon
- Gravity is almost certainly carried by gravitons, a  Spin=2 massless particle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graviton
- According to Relativity, the only way a massless particle can carry energy (such as light detected by your eyes, or gravitational waves detected by LIGO) is if they travel at a particular speed, called "c".

So light must travel at c, and gravitational waves must travel at c.
- We call c "the speed of light" because that is the context in which it was first measured
- But we may as well call it "the ultimate speed limit of the universe", which applies to both light and gravity.

Because of their different Spins, Photons and Gravitons are very different particles, and are carried by very different fields.

Light≠Gravity
Logged
 

Offline talanum1 (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 775
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 5 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Is Gravity Light?
« Reply #7 on: 30/01/2022 10:55:43 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 29/01/2022 14:55:51
The question now is "how come you didn't realise that for yourself?".

I didn't know how to think of it: stupid of me.
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.406 seconds with 47 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.