[talanum1 (OP)]

You felt something in the right front part of your head, so you assumed it was an unknown particle from a pi-minus decay entering your mind? Is that what you are saying??

No, I deliberately searched for a pi-minus decay, and felt one (it was somewhat like seeing a flash of light), then I felt the particle entering my mind.

[Origin]

No, I deliberately searched for a pi-minus decay,

You said you did not see a pi-minus decay, so how do you know it was a pi-minus decay?  What evidence do you have?  A flash of light or a feeling in your head is NOT evidence of pi-minus decay, those sights or feelings could be from anything.

[Kryptid]

Just my own feeling.

I didn't see it, but I felt it.

What evidence do you have that this feeling of yours had anything to do with a particle decay of any type?

Observe a pi-minus decay and feel it for yourself.

And how I am supposed to do that? Moreover, how am I supposed to confirm that any feeling that I experience is connected in any way to particle decay?

No, I deliberately searched for a pi-minus decay

How?

[talanum1 (OP)]

How?

I sort of scanned for it.

What evidence do you have that this feeling of yours had anything to do with a particle decay of any type?

I sort of registered a ray that stopped.

And how I am supposed to do that? Moreover, how am I supposed to confirm that any feeling that I experience is connected in any way to particle decay?

At a particle accelerator. You can interrogate the feeling in your mind.

You said you did not see a pi-minus decay, so how do you know it was a pi-minus decay?  What evidence do you have?  A flash of light or a feeling in your head is NOT evidence of pi-minus decay, those sights or feelings could be from anything.

What else could it be?

[Bored chemist]

What else could it be?

An hallucination.
We have been here before...

I believe they are not hallucinations.

Many schizophrenics don't believe their hallucinations are hallucinations either. Belief is irrelevant. Evidence is what is important.

It will be proven when a letter or email arrives here from one of my contacts.

Not really. There would be no way to prove to us that you sent that information via telepathy. You would need to demonstrate your telepathic abilities in a controlled environment in order to show its existence scientifically.

You can't: it is two Hydrogen atoms in my throat.

Then it isn't open to scientific investigation and therefore isn't science.

Maybe I can go somewhere where they have a cloud chamber and make some particle in it, while stating: "I made a particle", then there must be a corresponding trail in the cloud chamber.

There would be no way to tell that any of the countless particle trails in the chamber were made by you, so that isn't science either.

[Origin]

I sort of scanned for it.

I sort of registered a ray that stopped.

These statements are delusional.

 I am strongly suggesting that this be moved to "that can't be true" since this doesn't come close to being any sort of science.

[Kryptid]

I sort of scanned for it.

How? Do you have a scanner of some kind?

I sort of registered a ray that stopped.

How? You realize you are on a science board, don't you? You need to give us evidence that we can actually analyze, not just your word.

At a particle accelerator. You can interrogate the feeling in your mind.

Were you at a particle accelerator when you did this? Were you in a scenario where your result could be distinguished from placebo?

What else could it be?

The placebo effect.

I am strongly suggesting that this be moved to "that can't be true" since this doesn't come close to being any sort of science.

I agree in part, but lately I have been wondering if it's even appropriate to do that. "That Can't Be True" seems not to originally had the purpose of storing crank threads.

[Origin]

I agree in part, but lately I have been wondering if it's even appropriate to do that. "That Can't Be True" seems not to originally had the purpose of storing crank threads.

Agreed, this needs to go to a 'cesspool' or 'garbage' section.

[Kryptid]

Agreed, this needs to go to a 'cesspool' or 'garbage' section.

That's not a terrible idea. Perhaps I'll talk to the other mods about it.

[Colin2B]

I agree in part, but lately I have been wondering if it's even appropriate to do that. "That Can't Be True" seems not to originally had the purpose of storing crank threads.

That’s right, it also has greater visibility than New Theories so not a good place to move it.
Some of the things being said here are blatantly untrue and could be classed as delusional, and if not delusional then outright lies. Let’s discuss offline.

[talanum1 (OP)]

Were you at a particle accelerator when you did this? Were you in a scenario where your result could be distinguished from placebo?

No, I weren't at an accelerator. One day when there is a computer-mind interface I can check it.

nd if not delusional then outright lies

I take exception at being called a liar.

[Bored chemist]

I take exception at being called a liar.

So it's a delusion then.

[Kryptid]

I'm still waiting for you to explain how you know that your sensation had anything to do with pion decay. Tell me how you know it wasn't placebo.

[talanum1 (OP)]

My model highlights the problem of Parity: if coordinates are reversed left-right, a photon wavefunction do not acquire a negative sign, but if up-down is reversed it does.

Tell me how you know it wasn't placebo.

It was too distinctive. My "hallucinations" are just auditory.

[Bored chemist]

My hallucinations are just auditory.

No, they are not.

[Colin2B]

nd if not delusional then outright lies

I take exception at being called a liar.

I gave 2 options, I see you have chosen delusional.

[Origin]

My "hallucinations" are just auditory.

Are you on medication for your auditory hallucinations?  You can, of course, ignore this if you don't wish to answer.

[Kryptid]

I'm still waiting for you to explain how you know that your sensation had anything to do with pion decay.

I'm still waiting.

It was too distinctive.

How do you know that? You'd be surprised at what the placebo effect can do:

I recall seeing a program on television where people were given regular crystals but were told that they crystals had some kind of special energy in them. After handling the crystals for a while, the people being tested reported that they could actually feel the energy. A perfect example of a seemingly real physical sensation caused by placebo. If I can find that clip again, I'll post it.

Here's another example of how the mind can fabricate physical sensations:

[talanum1 (OP)]

I'm still waiting for you to explain how you know that your sensation had anything to do with pion decay.

I'm still waiting.

When I recalled it I saw a particle trajectory in the image in my mind.

[Bored chemist]

I'm still waiting for you to explain how you know that your sensation had anything to do with pion decay.

I'm still waiting.

When I recalled it I saw a particle trajectory in the image in my mind.

Imagining things doesn't make them real.