[Kryptid]

Not sure you really understand anything (thats why i suppose you could be stupid).
Here, you are in the "New theories forum".
Therefore you cant request, like you do, some reference like you did.

Okay then, so you finally admit that it is not currently recognized by science that Noether's theorem has any application to the concept of "now".

I dont need any reference to claim anything.

Right, but now you need some evidence that your idea is correct or there is no reason for any of us to believe you.

i am a scientist and i only account on facts.

You are? In what field? Where did you get your PhD?

[Deecart (OP)]

Reported for insulting members.

Reported to saying i am insulting members.

[Origin]

So what part of relativity is illusion?  I'm really curious what you think is illusion.

[Deecart (OP)]

Okay then, so you finally admit that it is not currently recognized by science that Noether's theorem has any application to the concept of "now".

I dont know the full human science, so yes you could be right.

You are? In what field? Where did you get your PhD

I have some mastery in biology (and a long life in information technology) and i can assure you that biologists are also trained in physics.
 

Right, but now you need some evidence that your idea is correct or there is no reason for any of us to believe you.

i dont need you to believe me (Believing..... thats not how science work !! This would be religion !!!)
I only need you to start you brain.

[Kryptid]

I have some mastery in biology and i can assure you that biologists are also trained in physic.

But what did you get your PhD in? You said you were a scientist, right? So what is your science job?

i dont need you to believe me (Believing..... that not how science work !! This would be religion !!!)

Belief is perfectly fine so long as it is backed up by evidence.

I only need you to start you brain.

Mine's working quite fine.

[Deecart (OP)]

Mine's working quite fine.

Thats what every malfunctioning brain will say.

[Kryptid]

Thats what every malfunctioning brain will say.

Are you implying that my brain is malfunctioning?

[Deecart (OP)]

But what did you get your PhD in? You said you were a scientist, right? So what is your science job?

General science is now my hobby.
Information science is my job.

[Origin]

Mine's working quite fine.

Thats what every malfunctioning brain will say.

What is wrong with you?  Can't you just answer questions without being insulting?

[Deecart (OP)]

Are you implying that my brain is malfunctioning?

If you do this deduction, this mean your brain is ill.
Because, if your brain is healthy you would conclude that it is either yours or mine that is malfunctioning.

[Kryptid]

If you do this deduction, this mean your brain is ill.
Because, if your brain is healthy you would conclude that it is either yours or mine that is malfunctioning.

Or that one is simply wrong. You don't have to have something wrong with your brain in order to be wrong. Everyone makes mistakes.

[Deecart (OP)]

What is wrong with you?  Can't you just answer questions without being insulting?

You say that saying my car is not fonctioning imply that you insult me ?

[Deecart (OP)]

Or that one is simply wrong. You don't have to have something wrong with your brain in order to be wrong. Everyone makes mistakes.

I never do mistakes, i learn.
Not sure how you do.

[Origin]

So I guess you are not going to answer the question, "what part of relativity do you think is an illusion"?

[Kryptid]

I never do mistakes

You never make mistakes?

Yeah, right...

[Deecart (OP)]

"what part of relativity do you think is an illusion"?

The non local phenomenon, i already answered ... not sure but i think 5 times. 

[Deecart (OP)]

You never make mistakes?

What, you do mistakes  ? ? ?
Is your brain ill ?

A mistake is something not accurate.
If you dont have the good facts, doing some false result is not making mistake.
At contrario, doing false result is a good result if the logical reasoning lead to the false result.

[Origin]

The non local phenomenon, i already answered ... not sure but i think 5 times.

Please define non local.  Are you saying you see illusion when you are observing another reference frame?
 

[Deecart (OP)]

Please define non local.  Are you saying you see illusion when I observing another reference frame.

No, when "i am observing", not "when i observing" (this doesent mean anything).
And... no, "the observation" has nothing to do with relativity (i surely lknown you already heard about).
I repeat : The reality is what happens localy.
Non local is what happens "around" (concerning space or time) where the phenomenon is occuring.
I am totaly convicted that real physic has to do with what happens at some point, at "the time" it occurs (time and space "position", so "the time" for some local observer).

[alancalverd]

This is a public warning. Cool it, guys. Please stick to the subject and avoid personal accusations.