0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
we are talking about the first real existing Perpetual motion, so sorry too. i suggest you take a look at the 13 min video and than you decide . thank you
we are talking about the first real existing Perpetual motion, so sorry too.
The device he presented in his video seem to be functional and at very first glance could be right in a physical point of view.
So, 2 possibilities.1. He is a crook.2. It works.
I don't see the flaw in his device.Do you ?
Conservation of energy.
The obvious flaw is that it's a perpetual motion machine and they are impossible.
You are wrong.It is not a perpetual motion machine.It is a superunitary machine.
Actually, it's a mistake.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 20/09/2022 20:36:41Actually, it's a mistake.Explain us (no general claim like it cant because it cant) why it cant work and i will believe you are some scientist.Actually i just know you dont even understand how his machine work.So actually you are at level 0
i will believe you are some scientist.
Someone already explained it a hundred years ago.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noether%27s_theorem
Reality doesn't care what you believe, and nor do I.Were you not aware of that?
A true scientist would try to understand the detail.
It won't work because the force of buoyancy on the chain would be equal on both spots that are passing through the water's surface.
And the work of this force is easy to calculate : Because of the energy conservation principle, its value is equal to the potential energy difference when the objects are separated.