0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Actual physics tells us the CO2 absorbs IR.Historical evidence shows that CO2 levels have never risen this fast before.
For fun @Bored chemist, between 1945 and 1978 is when surface nuclear testing was done.It started with 2 atomic bombs and evolved into thermonuclear bombs in the name of science.And yet when bombarding the atmosphere with radiation from such bombs the global temperature remained consistent which it never does. The consistent temperature for 30+ years is an anomaly. Before and after bomb testing the global temperature changes. A link to some basic info on nuclear testing; https://www.atomicarchive.com/almanac/test-sites/testing-chronology.html With this, what was underground and what was surface testing? Testing eventually turned underground so data can be pointed towards that. People being burned because the wind blew made that change necessary. And compare that to any global warming graph. Just an FYI, because this is on the internet it is common knowledge everyone knows. How to explain 30+ years of consistent weather? No one has offered a reason.
And then the Earth's position relative to the Sun will add to that as well.
Pretty close to 93 million miles; an orbit is not an easy thing to change in a hurry.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 07/10/2022 08:53:05Pretty close to 93 million miles; an orbit is not an easy thing to change in a hurry.But it does, with no human intervention at all. How easy is that?
Pretty close to 93 million miles
Today, the Earth’s orbital ellipticity is nearly circular at 0.0167, but that still causes 6% more insolation during Earth’s closest approach to the Sun than when it is farthest away.In ~200,000 years, when Earth’s orbit is at its most elliptical point, the difference in insolation between the closest and farthest approaches will be around 23%.
Depends on your definition of rapid.
Some of that is almost rational.
orbit becomes more elliptical because no ice age type glaciers to significantly change the Earth's moment of inertia.
Quote from: championoftruth on 06/10/2022 18:06:31You can google the cliumategate emails. They are shocking.You are the claimant. The burden of proof is on you to provide the evidence.Quote from: championoftruth on 06/10/2022 18:06:31constantly dismissing everything as a conspiracy theoryUntil you can supply the evidence that something sinister is going on, calling it a conspiracy theory is justified.Quote from: championoftruth on 06/10/2022 18:06:31not that difficult for 2 evil people to do evil.That doesn't mean that Bill Gates is making organizations falsify climate change data. You need to supply evidence for that. Him giving donations does not count as such evidence. What you need is evidence for sinister intent. Please supply us with such evidence.Quote from: championoftruth on 06/10/2022 18:06:31The place i live in had 7 to 12 days of 30 degrees this summer. in 1970 to 1980 the heat wave lasted 2 to 4 weeks.That's called cherry-picking: https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Cherry_pickingQuote from: championoftruth on 06/10/2022 18:06:31I just discovered that infra red temperature measurements from a distance have a very large margin of error so your satellite data is worthless.Link?Quote from: championoftruth on 06/10/2022 18:06:31And more proof is that the temperature of Jupiter as measured by old methods and by JWST is different by hundreds of degrees!!! It was in the News too.Link?Quote from: championoftruth on 06/10/2022 18:10:47Using Nasa as a authority crutch is absurd. This organization spent a billion on building a launch tower when SpaceX spend only 20 million !Many complex buildings in dubai cost 300 to 700 million. Yet a hunk of steel costing $3 a kilo cost Nasa a billion !They spend 80 billion on the Artemis SLS. I just discovered its cobbled together from old space shuttle parts!Where did the 80 billion go?You're claiming they can't be trusted because they spend a lot of money? I'm afraid I don't understand how that follows.
You can google the cliumategate emails. They are shocking.
constantly dismissing everything as a conspiracy theory
not that difficult for 2 evil people to do evil.
The place i live in had 7 to 12 days of 30 degrees this summer. in 1970 to 1980 the heat wave lasted 2 to 4 weeks.
I just discovered that infra red temperature measurements from a distance have a very large margin of error so your satellite data is worthless.
And more proof is that the temperature of Jupiter as measured by old methods and by JWST is different by hundreds of degrees!!! It was in the News too.
Using Nasa as a authority crutch is absurd. This organization spent a billion on building a launch tower when SpaceX spend only 20 million !Many complex buildings in dubai cost 300 to 700 million. Yet a hunk of steel costing $3 a kilo cost Nasa a billion !They spend 80 billion on the Artemis SLS. I just discovered its cobbled together from old space shuttle parts!Where did the 80 billion go?
Non-sequitur. Bees aren't going to make the whole planet warm up (especially since their population has been in decline. If bees were responsible for global warming, then temperatures should be dropping in step with their population.)
Nonsense. 100v/m to 1000v/m is nowhere near what an active thunderhead produces. 50kv/m is what is normally produced by an overhead thunderstorm.
In geological terms, it does seem to align with some very spectacular climatic phenomena on a fairly short timescale, like 0.005% of the life of the planet.