[Kartazion (OP)]

Hi.

I would like to publish here a pre-review online paper from the MDPI encyclopedia. Can I?

Thanks.

[Kryptid]

I know there is some kind of rule about not posting something that you've posted elsewhere, but I'm not sure how strictly that should be enforced. I think as long as you post it here as text instead of a link, that might be fine. The other moderators may want to chime in if they thing differently.

[JLindgaard]

 You have got to be kidding me, I say "dark matter" and they hate me for it and now "dark matter" allows for both matter and anti-matter? And that's not an issue when there is an equal but opposite effect  for observed physical phenomena?
 p.s., I've been drinking and am glad of it. A cosmological model basis has just been shown utilizing 2 different quanta of matter. What we observe and its anti-behavior which allows for it. That's like saying there is an equal but opposite effect. Who'd be stupid enough to say something like that?
 To be a total shїthed, all physical behavior is grounded. If you notice I use the Ukrainian ї, that's like "yi". Russian has no "ї" but is has a "ё" which is similar. Yo instead of yi.
 But what is the inverse of F'(x) = quanta? Does dark matter allow for the inverse function of matter?
Math does allow for that but does science allow for what language has shown us?

p.s., the inverse of matter would be F'(x) = quanta. The inverse function of matter would be the negative state of dark matter below absolute 0. Think a sprite above  thunderstorm.
https://earthsky.org/earth/definition-what-are-lightning-sprites/

[Kryptid]

You have got to be kidding me, I say "dark matter" and they hate me for it and now "dark matter" allows for both matter and anti-matter?

It's not like anyone has replied to Kartazion yet. If he is claiming somewhere that dark matter is matter and antimatter, then he is wrong.

[Kartazion (OP)]

 You have got to be kidding me, I say "dark matter" and they hate me for it and now "dark matter" allows for both matter and anti-matter?

It's part of antiuniverse.

And that's not an issue when there is an equal but opposite effect  for observed physical phenomena?

The behavior of matter through its fluctuation works asymmetrically. What physicists confirm.

p.s., I've been drinking and am glad of it. A cosmological model basis has just been shown utilizing 2 different quanta of matter. What we observe and its anti-behavior which allows for it. That's like saying there is an equal but opposite effect. Who'd be stupid enough to say something like that?

The asymmetry between matter and antimatter precisely allows this vibration and not an annihilation.

[Kartazion (OP)]

It's not like anyone has replied to Kartazion yet. If he is claiming somewhere that dark matter is matter and antimatter, then he is wrong.

What he meant is that through antimatter I demonstrate anti-dark matter. Antimatter and dark matter are two distinct things.

[Kryptid]

What he meant is that through antimatter I demonstrate anti-dark matter.

That isn't necessarily true. Dark matter could be its own antiparticle in the same way that photons are.

[Kartazion (OP)]

That isn't necessarily true. Dark matter could be its own antiparticle in the same way that photons are.

Right.

[Colin2B]

I know there is some kind of rule about not posting something that you've posted elsewhere, but I'm not sure how strictly that should be enforced. I think as long as you post it here as text instead of a link, that might be fine. The other moderators may want to chime in if they thing differently.

Strictly speaking it should not have been published elsewhere in any form. Can we discuss in mod forum.

[pzkpfw]

It's been a long running speculation topic (many threads) at science forums (.net).

e.g. https://www.scienceforums.net/topic/127558-the-universe-in-pictures-as-youve-never-seen-it-before/

[Kryptid]

I know there is some kind of rule about not posting something that you've posted elsewhere, but I'm not sure how strictly that should be enforced. I think as long as you post it here as text instead of a link, that might be fine. The other moderators may want to chime in if they thing differently.

Strictly speaking it should not have been published elsewhere in any form. Can we discuss in mod forum.

Welp, looks like I was wrong.

Close it if you have to.

[Kartazion (OP)]

Breaking off dialogue like the USA .net forum has done is a declaration of war.

[Bored chemist]

Breaking off dialogue like the USA .net forum has done is a declaration of war.

That's just silly.
Is USA.net a country?
Does it have armed forces?
If not, how can it declare war?

[Kartazion (OP)]

Is USA.net a country?

This forum is managed by Simon Foundation. So yes this forum is American from US.

Does it have armed forces?
If not, how can it declare war?

The expression war is a polysemic concept. Economic warfare, informational warfare. But yes the weapons are there. You must bow to this theory of physics described above to avoid all of this.

[Kryptid]

You must bow to this theory of physics described above to avoid all of this.

What do you mean by that, exactly?

[Kartazion (OP)]

What do you mean by that, exactly?

Avoid war. You have to get down on your knees and recognize the theory as such to avoid war. Instead of defaulting the theory you avoid the OP. Does that suit you as an answer?

[Kryptid]

Does that suit you as an answer?

No. Are you talking about literal war or what? A war started by who?

[Bored chemist]

You have to get down on your knees and recognize the theory as such to avoid war

The most likely cause of war at the minute is that maniac Putin.
My recognition of some crackpot idea here isn't going to influence him, is it?

[Kartazion (OP)]

No. Are you talking about literal war or what? A war started by who?

The expression war is a polysemic concept. My main weapon is intelligence even if it is not very developed. And I understood that a long time ago that now according to some other like some nations, refutes the idea of ​​a "democracy" type model which is not. Thereby the mechanical war of weapons is predictable because of the model imposed by Westerners who are only colonists who took people as slaves back then. For example our president in France prefers to do weird party rather than worrying about the people. In our ads to sell you articles they put women to strip you. This is the model that Westerners want to impose on the world as a land of freedom.

My recognition of some crackpot idea here isn't going to influence him, is it?

Influence him? Who? I influence him?

The most likely cause of war at the minute is that maniac Putin.

Bis. The expression war is a polysemic concept. My main weapon is intelligence even if it is not very developed.

[Bored chemist]

The expression war is a polysemic concept.

https://xkcd.com/169/

My main weapon is intelligence

Whose?

Influence him? Who? I influence him?

Putin, clearly.