[Kartazion (OP)]

Whose?

Simply I have the idea of ​​making a trip to the university of cambridge to be able to expose my theory before the UK is razed by a nuclear bomb. Who knows?

Putin, clearly.

This implies that you consider me quite influential. I know the cause of its action and that I have described above, but to be honest to avoid it would be to recognize that the world is rotten like a worm in the apple and to change its attitude radically.

[JLindgaard]

What he meant is that through antimatter I demonstrate anti-dark matter.

That isn't necessarily true. Dark matter could be its own antiparticle in the same way that photons are.

 And in math they say the inverse is always true. When it comes to states of matter, what would prevent dark matter from having the inverse potential? When Einstein said that dense matter warps space, is it because of the inverse function of matter? And that gravity when reduced to the universal constant G it shows this?
 Basically the field matter occupies is distorted because of the inverse effect which matter is. It's not dark matter, right? We have photons/light. We have matter which is observed. And what is the inverse function? Nothing?
 

[Kryptid]

And in math they say the inverse is always true.

I'm not sure what you mean by that.

When it comes to states of matter, what would prevent dark matter from having the inverse potential?

What is an inverse potential?

When Einstein said that dense matter warps space, is it because of the inverse function of matter?

Again, I don't know what an "inverse function of matter" is.

[Kartazion (OP)]

When Einstein said that dense matter warps space, is it because of the inverse function of matter?

You need to be more explicit. Deformation is not anti-matter.

Basically the field matter occupies is distorted because of the inverse effect which matter is. It's not dark matter, right?

For example calculations shows that dark matter makes the galaxy coherent with its supermassive black hole. Dark matter is transparent and is not atoms unlike antimatter which are only antiparticles.

[JLindgaard]

When Einstein said that dense matter warps space, is it because of the inverse function of matter?

You need to be more explicit. Deformation is not anti-matter.

Basically the field matter occupies is distorted because of the inverse effect which matter is. It's not dark matter, right?

For example calculations shows that dark matter makes the galaxy coherent with its supermassive black hole. Dark matter is transparent and is not atoms unlike antimatter which are only antiparticles.

 And what is the inverse function of a black hole? Light does not escape a black hole yet light can be observed on the other side of a black hole. Please don't tell me that a black hole is just a vortex in space where all "matter" is rotating around it.

[Kartazion (OP)]

And what is the inverse function of a black hole? Light does not escape a black hole yet light can be observed on the other side of a black hole. Please don't tell me that a black hole is just a vortex in space where all "matter" is rotating around it.

There's not just space in this vortex. But time is also "distorted". Unbelievable! But in relation to the symmetry with the example of the mirror, you have its exact copy but in inverted value. That it.

[JLindgaard]

And what is the inverse function of a black hole? Light does not escape a black hole yet light can be observed on the other side of a black hole. Please don't tell me that a black hole is just a vortex in space where all "matter" is rotating around it.

There's not just space in this vortex. But time is also "distorted". Unbelievable! But in relation to the symmetry with the example of the mirror, you have its exact copy but in inverted value. That it.

 Am glad you understand the difference between something "mirrored" and a black hole does not emit light.
I think everyone else is trying to understand negative space.

[Kartazion (OP)]

Hawking was able to demonstrate that thermodynamic black bodies such as black holes can emit photons, among other things. The Hawking radiation highlights the emission of radiation by the black hole.

[Kartazion (OP)]

PS: Do not confuse the photon emission at the beginning of the singularity where at this point laws of physics ceases to exist.

[JLindgaard]

PS: Do not confuse the photon emission at the beginning of the singularity where at this point laws of physics ceases to exist.

 I hope you're not trying to confuse a black hole with an event horizon. This is a science forum. Should we be discussing actual science?

[Kartazion (OP)]

It's called Black Hole Evaporation which reduces the black hole's energy and mass.

[JLindgaard]

It's called Black Hole Evaporation which reduces the black hole's energy and mass.

 We're in a forum. Accept their rules. A black hole becomes a neutron star. Energy becomes denser.
Today the event happening doesn't allow for a quasar.

[Kryptid]

A black hole becomes a neutron star.

I don't think that can happen.

[JLindgaard]

A black hole becomes a neutron star.

I don't think that can happen.

 This a science forum. Faith is not allowed. How can a black hole mirror a physical occurrence? That
does not happen. Black holes absorb all energy while emitting none. A black hole can never mirror energy.
If a mirror doesn't reflect it, it's not reflected.

[Kryptid]

How can a black hole mirror a physical occurrence?

I never said it could.

Black holes absorb all energy while emitting none.

Stephen Hawking would have said otherwise.

A black hole can never mirror energy.

What do you mean by that? Black holes have energy, but I don't recall anyone saying that they reflect it.

[Kartazion (OP)]

@JLindgaard  says that because he asks for the inverse function of the black hole. I took the example of the mirror as it is used in physics (reflection) at the LHCb antimatter expert.

And what is the inverse function of a black hole?

[JLindgaard]

How can a black hole mirror a physical occurrence?

I never said it could.

Black holes absorb all energy while emitting none.

Stephen Hawking would have said otherwise.

A black hole can never mirror energy.

What do you mean by that? Black holes have energy, but I don't recall anyone saying that they reflect it.

 Maybe you and Kartazion will find this answer satisfactory.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021/07/210712122120.htm

 

[Kryptid]

 Maybe you and Kartazion will find this answer satisfactory.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021/07/210712122120.htm

Technically what is being "mirrored" is light. Light has energy as one of its properties, but isn't energy itself.

[JLindgaard]

Maybe you and Kartazion will find this answer satisfactory.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021/07/210712122120.htm

Technically what is being "mirrored" is light. Light has energy as one of its properties, but isn't energy itself.

 This is an easy one. What do you see on the other side of a black hole? Black holes emit no light. What does? A vacuum?

[Kryptid]

What do you see on the other side of a black hole?

Depends on what you mean by "other side". Black holes probably look just about the same from all outside angles (except for the quickly spinning ones, which would be oblate spheroids instead of spheres). If you are asking about inside a black hole, then you probably wouldn't see anything.

Black holes emit no light.

If they are small enough, the Hawking radiation they emit should contain visible light.