[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

It's what I've heard around. Sorry if I don't have an exact source.
I don't have a problem with discussing theory and science.
I do have a problem where you keep pushing buttons in your own speech behavior.
talking on my mental health. what sense i make to you. where you don't even reply to half the questions i ask you.
you've been extremely rude. sorry if i don't accept your poor behavior. Sorry if it offends you that you speaking on me instead of theory is seen rudely in my eyes. which you don't get to set by the way. The way I perceive things. Only your intent. so please. keep blowing up convos and ignoring me say please leave me alone. your ego is showing bro, and it's not a pretty look. you keep making statements, not very scientific. we propose hypothesis. so, like I've said, please, discontinue this repeated overstep of talking on me, my mental health, or your ability to understand me.

Does it bother you that bad that the convo is over your head?
someone done admitted that a special allowance is in atoms for perpetual systems.
i asked if one could be useful to describe expansion in cosmological systems.
and apparently that earned your scorn.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

hydro ram pumps could possibly work in a closed system.

No. They really won't.
There is no such thing as a free lunch.
Energy is a conserved quantity.

unless, mass is inertia reserve. as in two different mass systems interacting at 0.5 and 2.5 to stay off of zero, creating our use of infinity in mathematics bro. collatz conjecture extends to near infinite domains because of a simple 3n+1, and n/2. chaos theory logistics maps use a 0.5 multiplier.
2n+1 always produces odds with whole numbers.
2n always produces evens with whole numbers.
neutrons show boson interactions which is different from proton and electron.
if we consider 1 particle 1 step movement.
electron is negative associated. -1
proton is positive associated. +2
-1+2=1
neutron is neutral, but after electron and proton
-2+1=-1
1+(-1)=0
force=mass*acceleration.
meaning, it shows a direct line interaction between mass and force like matter and antimatter.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

keep it on subject.

You first

gotta love the impromptu 5 room problem design (mathematics problem)

so the breakdown of 2n+1 that mimics the 5 room problem is not on subject. right. bro that 2n+1=3, 2n+1=5, 2n+1=7

then it's (2*(2n+1=3))+1=7 done to show positive and negative interactions.
which also shows 2n=2, 2n=4, 2n=6, when you don't consider the zero line.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

I'm sorry to be the bearer of bad news but this

dissociative identity disorder as well as schizo-affective disorder, bipolar type.

Is the only reason why this

what if, because of time and the multiverse, nature tricked humanity into looping its time, to progress humans to a certain level (just before normalizing space travel), before releasing them into say, the latter 2/3rd's of overall time of a universe, in multiplicity? kind of shooting them out at different time and points because of when and which parallel ends a time loop? if we use electron shell diagram's four levels, for 3 levels past the multiverse, (mega-verse, giga-verse, tetra-verse) we could actually explain excess light to being from another universe, as shared data. We would need to initiate a time loop. is it possible that man made atoms (if nature does not make them) might be looping time?

makes sense to you.

this is the kind of rudeness i'm talking about. you have no business saying this. I know i'm crazy, so what? are you perfectly mentally sane yourself?
have you never had a down day?
have you never had a breakup?
a bad thought on yourself or another?

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

I'm sorry to be the bearer of bad news but this

dissociative identity disorder as well as schizo-affective disorder, bipolar type.

Is the only reason why this

what if, because of time and the multiverse, nature tricked humanity into looping its time, to progress humans to a certain level (just before normalizing space travel), before releasing them into say, the latter 2/3rd's of overall time of a universe, in multiplicity? kind of shooting them out at different time and points because of when and which parallel ends a time loop? if we use electron shell diagram's four levels, for 3 levels past the multiverse, (mega-verse, giga-verse, tetra-verse) we could actually explain excess light to being from another universe, as shared data. We would need to initiate a time loop. is it possible that man made atoms (if nature does not make them) might be looping time?

makes sense to you.

this is the kind of rudeness i'm talking about. you have no business saying this. I know i'm crazy, so what? are you perfectly mentally sane yourself?
have you never had a down day?
have you never had a breakup?
a bad thought on yourself or another?

and to further that, i did not ask for the damage life handed me to make me this insane person willing to continue to ask questions that we should be asking, as in new discoveries can shed new light on past results. we have to continue to work retroactively.
so why is my insanity, which i did not ask for but must deal with, your target of aggression?
do you have that little of a heart?

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

I'm sorry to be the bearer of bad news but this

dissociative identity disorder as well as schizo-affective disorder, bipolar type.

Is the only reason why this

what if, because of time and the multiverse, nature tricked humanity into looping its time, to progress humans to a certain level (just before normalizing space travel), before releasing them into say, the latter 2/3rd's of overall time of a universe, in multiplicity? kind of shooting them out at different time and points because of when and which parallel ends a time loop? if we use electron shell diagram's four levels, for 3 levels past the multiverse, (mega-verse, giga-verse, tetra-verse) we could actually explain excess light to being from another universe, as shared data. We would need to initiate a time loop. is it possible that man made atoms (if nature does not make them) might be looping time?

makes sense to you.

this is the kind of rudeness i'm talking about. you have no business saying this. I know i'm crazy, so what? are you perfectly mentally sane yourself?
have you never had a down day?
have you never had a breakup?
a bad thought on yourself or another?

and to further that, i did not ask for the damage life handed me to make me this insane person willing to continue to ask questions that we should be asking, as in new discoveries can shed new light on past results. we have to continue to work retroactively.
so why is my insanity, which i did not ask for but must deal with, your target of aggression?
do you have that little of a heart?

have a good day sir. and i hope you find what will make you better. the best you, you could ever achieve.

[Bored chemist]

I know i'm crazy, so what?

So you are unlikely to make well thought through statements about physics.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

I know i'm crazy, so what?

So you are unlikely to make well thought through statements about physics.

like destroying particles and creating nuclear weapons are well thought through?
the destruction of forests by humans is well thought through?
The way we react and treat each other?
we are all a bit damaged.
You just judge my damage. and I'm good on that.
who are you to say if I am of sound mind to put good thought into things?
why should anyone hear you over me?
I've made arguments already about the psychological effect of being in love with a system is akin to Stockholm syndrome. the unbalance of ego bringing an unnerve.
Its debate bro. if you can't handle the thought that you may have absorbed improper information, I'm sorry. but then again I'm not, because you chose a career in science.
What if relativity applies to numbers. where its interactions of space that create everything? what if to make a system that describes the universe, we use no numbers, but interactions of x,y and z? z+z+z is the same as 3z.

[Bored chemist]

who are you to say if I am of sound mind to put good thought into things?

It's not me who is saying that; it's the evidence.
Perpetual motion does not work.

[Bored chemist]

the destruction of forests by humans is well thought through?

Was it "well thought through " to consider deforestation as physics?

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

who are you to say if I am of sound mind to put good thought into things?

It's not me who is saying that; it's the evidence.
Perpetual motion does not work.

science says consider evidence.
evidence states dark matter has not been found.
evidence states religious pressure through ex-communication could influence rulers.
alchemy was banned longer than science was.
history is important, so is realizing that influence can have negative impacts. like we see with social media and teens today.
If an organization was to want to control information, to control access to knowledge, for people's own safety, they might just influence the hiding of technology and push for things to be hidden, within knowledge, by showing a different route to find results that is similar but not exact.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

the destruction of forests by humans is well thought through?

Was it "well though through " to consider deforestation as physics?

we are a part of nature, are we not?
does a chainsaw require knowledge of physics to design it?
does it's fuel not require a chemist? even if they are bored?
oil pumping and production?
does the need for timber not come from building things like houses, which is engineering, and is bound to physics?

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

who are you to say if I am of sound mind to put good thought into things?

It's not me who is saying that; it's the evidence.
Perpetual motion does not work.

evidence. vs does not work. you have a conundrum. I cannot fathom what you mean. if we have evidence, accepted conjecture of what is, how can we say it does not work?
please. explain.

[Kryptid]

evidence states dark matter has not been found.

There is evidence for its existence.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

who are you to say if I am of sound mind to put good thought into things?

It's not me who is saying that; it's the evidence.
Perpetual motion does not work.

evidence. vs does not work. you have a conundrum. I cannot fathom what you mean. if we have evidence, accepted conjecture of what is, how can we say it does not work?
please. explain.

I think you meant to say, its likely hood of being possible, probable and buildable is zero, especially with today's technology.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

evidence states dark matter has not been found.

There is evidence for its existence.

Max Planck: "When you change the way you look at things, the things you look at change."

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

a neutron as a charged force battery. A positive spectrum only. range=n where 2n+1=all positive spectrum. mass=inertia reserve for a singularity theorem of everything.



range=n where 2n+1=all positive (+1 is for 0 in negative to positive aspect)

[Kryptid]

Max Planck: "When you change the way you look at things, the things you look at change."

That doesn't change the fact that there is evidence for the existence of dark matter.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

I'm only building knowledge. The best ways I can at moment. while I'm studying. I do believe a few very specific devices are possible but require a level of precision we may never be able to achieve. The study of said systems though, may reap rewards that could be very prosperous. As to people making statements, assuming the legitimacy of current thought to be the most accurate way of discernment possible:
Max Planck: "Ego is the immediate dictate of human consciousness."

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

Max Planck: "When you change the way you look at things, the things you look at change."

That doesn't change the fact that there is evidence for the existence of dark matter.

unless it's evidence of cosmological perpetual expansion.
People can see our existence as evidence of god, if that is the position, they choose to see things from.

Our beginning mindset sets our ability to perceive and discern results.
by the way, I'm actually a believe in dark matter and dark energy, just in different capacities.