The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 ... 18 19 [20] 21 22 23   Go Down

Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)

  • 452 Replies
  • 61058 Views
  • 2 Tags

0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #380 on: 17/10/2022 14:14:50 »
damn i hate random synchronicities.
we are debating on a hexagon based subatomic existence....
a possibly new subatomic model...
sorry. i know that aint science, but it is creepy.
wait hexagon don't describe it right.
pentagon/hexagon hybrid?
it is at 5, when discharged. but if a neutron holds a fast moving charge, it would be at 6 when charged.

* f'n creeptastic lol.jpg (14.19 kB, 682x106 - viewed 102 times.)
« Last Edit: 17/10/2022 14:18:20 by KiltedWeirdo »
Logged
 



Marked as best answer by KiltedWeirdo on 17/10/2022 14:18:54

Offline Origin

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2248
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 210 times
  • Nothing of importance
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #381 on: 17/10/2022 14:18:36 »
Quote from: KiltedWeirdo on 17/10/2022 14:05:24
even if it destroys your religion?
What are you talking about??
Logged
 

Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #382 on: 17/10/2022 14:19:43 »
Quote from: Origin on 17/10/2022 14:18:36
Quote from: KiltedWeirdo on 17/10/2022 14:05:24
even if it destroys your religion?
What are you talking about??
Christians state time ends in revelations. thats why they destroyed perpetual systems. to not be proven wrong.
the antichrist ends the world.
instead, they thought we would grow to be heavenly or more godlike. through another existence.
the afterlife.
energy cannot be created nor destroyed. if time is perpetual it has no end. it disproves Christian beliefs.
Logged
 

Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #383 on: 17/10/2022 14:22:22 »
Quote from: KiltedWeirdo on 17/10/2022 14:19:43
Quote from: Origin on 17/10/2022 14:18:36
Quote from: KiltedWeirdo on 17/10/2022 14:05:24
even if it destroys your religion?
What are you talking about??
Christians state time ends in revelations. thats why they destroyed perpetual systems. to not be proven wrong.
the antichrist ends the world.
instead, they thought we would grow to be heavenly or more godlike. through another existence.
the afterlife.
energy cannot be created nor destroyed. if time is perpetual it has no end. it disproves Christian beliefs.

Religion

Scale of time in Jain texts shown logarithmically
Further information: Time and fate deities
Linear and cyclical
See also: Time cycles and Wheel of time
Ancient cultures such as Incan, Mayan, Hopi, and other Native American Tribes – plus the Babylonians, ancient Greeks, Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism, and others – have a concept of a wheel of time: they regard time as cyclical and quantic,[clarification needed] consisting of repeating ages that happen to every being of the Universe between birth and extinction.[36]

In general, the Islamic and Judeo-Christian world-view regards time as linear[37] and directional,[38] beginning with the act of creation by God. The traditional Christian view sees time ending, teleologically,[39] with the eschatological end of the present order of things, the "end time".

In the Old Testament book Ecclesiastes, traditionally ascribed to Solomon (970–928 BC), time (as the Hebrew word עידן, זמן iddan (age, as in "Ice age") zĕman(time) is often translated) was traditionally regarded[by whom?] as a medium for the passage of predestined events.[citation needed] (Another word, زمان" זמן" zamān, meant time fit for an event, and is used as the modern Arabic, Persian, and Hebrew equivalent to the English word "time".)

Time in Greek mythology
The Greek language denotes two distinct principles, Chronos and Kairos. The former refers to numeric, or chronological, time. The latter, literally "the right or opportune moment", relates specifically to metaphysical or Divine time. In theology, Kairos is qualitative, as opposed to quantitative.[40]

In Greek mythology, Chronos (ancient Greek: Χρόνος) is identified as the Personification of Time. His name in Greek means "time" and is alternatively spelled Chronus (Latin spelling) or Khronos. Chronos is usually portrayed as an old, wise man with a long, gray beard, such as "Father Time". Some English words whose etymological root is khronos/chronos include chronology, chronometer, chronic, anachronism, synchronise, and chronicle.

Time in Kabbalah

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time
Logged
 

Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #384 on: 17/10/2022 14:25:30 »
hence why the disc of sabu was shattered. why we hardly found evidence of the sun god in Mayan territory.
Logged
 



Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #385 on: 17/10/2022 14:26:26 »
all religions have core simularities. they used what words they had, to explain what they thought. ever since, europe has been acting kinda childish.
Logged
 

Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #386 on: 17/10/2022 14:29:28 »
try to see their commonalities as known physics at the time, with their differences being arguments of details.
all of physcis. not god, but time itself.

* Hollowed Vs Hallowed.png (656.14 kB, 1862x1928 - viewed 82 times.)

* history (small).png (392.8 kB, 1130x822 - viewed 106 times.)
« Last Edit: 17/10/2022 14:34:21 by KiltedWeirdo »
Logged
 

Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 8082
  • Activity:
    1.5%
  • Thanked: 514 times
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #387 on: 17/10/2022 14:30:19 »
A perpetual motion machine has no relevance to Christianity, so that's a non-sequitur.

Bored Chemist is blunt, but I'm not certain that he's breaking the rules. He's right when he says that your posts don't make sense. Origin, Colin2B and myself all seem to agree on that. I don't personally mean that as an offense. Something just needs to be done about your sentence structure if you want to be understood.
Logged
 

Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #388 on: 17/10/2022 14:35:08 »
Quote from: Kryptid on 17/10/2022 14:30:19
A perpetual motion machine has no relevance to Christianity, so that's a non-sequitur.

Bored Chemist is blunt, but I'm not certain that he's breaking the rules. He's right when he says that your posts don't make sense. Origin, Colin2B and myself all seem to agree on that. I don't personally mean that as an offense. Something just needs to be done about your sentence structure if you want to be understood.
unless the  holy grail was a perpetual motion machine.
the ark of the covenant?
Logged
 



Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #389 on: 17/10/2022 14:36:35 »
believing someone lived thousands of years isn't very scientific btw.
Logged
 

Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 8082
  • Activity:
    1.5%
  • Thanked: 514 times
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #390 on: 17/10/2022 14:37:51 »
They weren't perpetual motion machines.
Logged
 

Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #391 on: 17/10/2022 14:38:30 »
Quote from: Kryptid on 17/10/2022 14:37:51
They weren't perpetual motion machines.
prove it. beyond any shadow of a doubt.
you stated it. prove it.
you can't. unless you have a theory of everything that states its impossible.
we can keep trying to prove its not possible.
but until we have that working understanding of everything, we don't truly know.
Logged
 

Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #392 on: 17/10/2022 14:40:04 »
body of christ, gods son, could very well mean a smaller version of all existence.
if god=time in heaven=tetra-verse.
« Last Edit: 17/10/2022 14:43:55 by KiltedWeirdo »
Logged
 



Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 8082
  • Activity:
    1.5%
  • Thanked: 514 times
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #393 on: 17/10/2022 14:44:56 »
Because (1) Noether's theorem, and (2) boxes and cups aren't machines.
Logged
 

Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #394 on: 17/10/2022 14:45:24 »
you guys keep thinking that i haven't thought well into this. have you considered if i have, but my autism paired with your unwillingness to adjust your thought processes are what is limiting us?
i can't do anything about my autism. maybe you can open up and think more, while making definitive statements less.
Logged
 

Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #395 on: 17/10/2022 14:45:44 »
Quote from: Kryptid on 17/10/2022 14:44:56
Because (1) Noether's theorem, and (2) boxes and cups aren't machines.
2. what is in the box?
a body or machine?
do we have the dna of christ?
if so, how do we know that dna is of christ?
not some other person?

how did this turn into schrodinger's box?
is the cat a machine or dead body? lol
« Last Edit: 17/10/2022 14:48:02 by KiltedWeirdo »
Logged
 

Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 8082
  • Activity:
    1.5%
  • Thanked: 514 times
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #396 on: 17/10/2022 14:48:15 »
No machine in the box, no.
Logged
 



Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #397 on: 17/10/2022 14:49:21 »
Quote from: Kryptid on 17/10/2022 14:48:15
No machine in the box, no.
proof. or is that your belief. lol. science bro. prove it please. prove that a perpetual machine could not be in the box. cause if time and atoms both have perpetuality in it, you just worked yourself into a box.
Logged
 

Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 8082
  • Activity:
    1.5%
  • Thanked: 514 times
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #398 on: 17/10/2022 14:51:06 »
Remember what I said about Noether's theorem?
Logged
 

Offline KiltedWeirdo (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 329
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Can we use spheres with 2^n to show will to move (perpetual energy creation?)
« Reply #399 on: 17/10/2022 14:51:38 »
Quote from: Kryptid on 17/10/2022 14:51:06
Remember what I said about Noether's theorem?
describe time please. if atoms are allowed perpetual systems, describe time.
when does it stop?
and don't quote scripture.
what if time is a 2nd perpetual system. and nature used Neother's theorem to loop time on us.
it would explain Mandella effect. as physics.
improper data processing. mixing of existences to reform a crashed universe. no need for big bang.
more like, smaller bangs. on an overall loop.
where does big bang get its incoming energy? tesseracts from the multiverse maybe?
« Last Edit: 17/10/2022 14:55:40 by KiltedWeirdo »
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 ... 18 19 [20] 21 22 23   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: delusion  / pseudoscience 
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.733 seconds with 68 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.