[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

hydrogen=1.00784 u (1 electron + 1 proton)
deuterium=2.014 amu (1 electron + 1 proton +1 neutron)
Helium=4.002 (stable) (2 electron + 2 proton +2 neutron)
4.002/2=2.001

2.001/5=0.4002

0.4002+0.2001=0.6003

0.4002-0.2001=0.2001

0.2001 electron
0.4002 proton
0.6003 neutron

0.6003+0.4002=1.0005 (lighter than hydrogen)

0.6003+0.4002+0.2001=1.2006 (way too light for deuterium)

0.6003-0.10005=0.50025
0.4002+0.10005=0.50025

0.2001 electron
0.50025 proton
0.50025 neutron

0.50025+0.2001=0.70035
0.50025+0.50025+0.2001=1.2006

0.50025-0.050025=0.450225
0.50025+0.050025=0.550275

0.2001 electron
0.450225 proton
0.550275 neutron

0.2001+0.550275=0.750375
0.2001+0.550275+0.450225=1.2006


like i said. a balancing issue is shown.
gotta love chaos theory and collatz conjecture. its as if n/2 evens and 0.5n are nearly the same thing lol!
whereas:
4.002/12=0.3335
electron=0.334
proton=0.667
neutron=1
0.334+0.667=1.001 (under hydrogen)
0.334+0.667+1=2.001 (under deuterium)
2*(0.334+0.667+1)=4.002 (helium exact)

allowing:
electron=-1 (movement)
proton= +2 (movement)
neutron=-2+1 (movement)
or :
point=electron where line segment=proton, where triangle=neutron, where square=atom. (number theory by shapes)

can you explain this?

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

theorem:
a general proposition not self-evident but proved by a chain of reasoning; a truth established by means of accepted truths.

Physics is the natural science that studies matter, its fundamental constituents, its motion and behavior through space and time, and the related entities of energy and force. Physics is one of the most fundamental scientific disciplines, with its main goal being to understand how the universe behaves.

The word "physics" comes from Ancient Greek: φυσική (ἐπιστήμη), romanized: physikḗ (epistḗmē), meaning "knowledge of nature".[8][9][10]
knowledge:
facts, information, and skills acquired by a person through experience or education; the theoretical or practical understanding of a subject.

key parts:
accepted truths
with its main goal being to understand how the universe behaves
knowledge of nature
the theoretical or practical understanding of a subject.
meaning, we are not fully knowledgeable in exact scientific operations of physics. meaning we still have room to clear old theorems once disproven.
and force is the most abundant thing in the universe, when paired with mass.
e=mc^2.
which means
e/c^2=m
meaning Einstein missed mass interactions in his theory of everything. He didn't realize the flip particle. We didn't have information access like we do now. Nor did we have as much work done on Collatz Conjecture. which leads to how we break the 5 point standard atomic model.
or balance the 5 point standard atomic model and possibly win a nobel prize lol.

[Bored chemist]

can you explain this?

Yes.
You have written random words and numbers.

[Bored chemist]

the symmetry issue does possibly apply to standard model. but not the weighted hexagon model. let me remind you of the way water compression works, in hexagon systems.

Can you explain why you think that the compressibility of water is related to the fact that the laws of physics are the same tomorrow as they were yesterday?

You have not yet provided a reply that actually answers the question.
What does the temporal symmetry of the laws of physics have to do with the structure of water?

It's not harassment to ask someone a question on a debating site (and if they don't actually answer it, to ask again).
But, if you don't want to answer then debating isn't your thing.
That's OK,  go and find a blog site somewhere.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

a hexagon system in water allows compression. a similar effect is seen in electron shell diagram. a natural compression. 2^n.
2^n=2 where n=1
2^n=4 where n=2
2^n=8 where n=3
2^n=16 where n=4
2^n=32 where n=5
2^n=64 where n=6
electron shell diagram:
layer 1=2
layer 2=8
layer 3=18
layer 4=32

so change qualities of 2 in layer 3.
layer 3=16+2
have them act on layer 2 and layer 4 in opposition to the rest of layer 3.
layer2= 16 or 4 as well as 8
layer 4=16 or 64 as well as 32
because relativity matters on all levels.
its a compression system within the electron shell diagram, that removes 1 layer.
removing that one layer grants extra energy.
but to remove this one layer, and still keep 2^n in tact, nature reversed some qualities. or its spin or something like that. positive to negative spin.
for the link to compression, we can't use a pentagram. it has to be a hexagram. it has to match water.
water compression has to have an origin based in atomic structure.
in 4 layers, it could be compressing 6 layers of 2^n
I have to apologize here, but my mind hasn't been able to link what difference might actually be present in the two electrons. I want to say matter's spin direction instead of antimatter. I'm still unsure there.

there was a paper in a bio journal that used horus eye fractions as senses. it equated 2^n to horus eye, eye of ra. Sorry, i don't have a link and don't remember what it was called. but it helped inspire my work. But i'm pretty sure Ancient Egypt fully understood. just not minute details.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

the symmetry issue does possibly apply to standard model. but not the weighted hexagon model. let me remind you of the way water compression works, in hexagon systems.

Can you explain why you think that the compressibility of water is related to the fact that the laws of physics are the same tomorrow as they were yesterday?

You have not yet provided a reply that actually answers the question.
What does the temporal symmetry of the laws of physics have to do with the structure of water?

It's not harassment to ask someone a question on a debating site (and if they don't actually answer it, to ask again).
But, if you don't want to answer then debating isn't your thing.
That's OK,  go and find a blog site somewhere.

words get harder for me. I have autism. but i'm trying to actually seek help in pushing this further, due to my said limits.

[Bored chemist]

a hexagon system in water allows compression.

What did you think that meant?
Are you aware that iron is elastic and has a cubic structure?
Neither alcohol, nor mercury has a hexagonal structure, but one is more compressible than water and the other is less so.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

a hexagon system in water allows compression.

What did you think that meant?
Are you aware that iron is elastic and has a cubic structure?
Neither alcohol, nor mercury has a hexagonal structure, but one is more compressible than water and the other is less so.

oxygen=8,
hydrogen=1
8+1+1=10.
that's why it matters. the atomic number interactions. and the fact that water and life go hand in hand.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

a hexagon system in water allows compression.

What did you think that meant?
Are you aware that iron is elastic and has a cubic structure?
Neither alcohol, nor mercury has a hexagonal structure, but one is more compressible than water and the other is less so.

iron's cubic structure is what allows magnetism so easily with iron. it allows ease of aligning internal tesseracts. remember, iron has a quantum environment as well. meaning its kind of nature's premier tesseract.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

mercury is element # 80.

oxygen is 8. see the parallel?

80/8=10
8+1+1=10 (compression)
8*10=80 (non-compression) expands with temperature.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

put it this way. we can always break time down by t/2.
at it's fastest, light as:
(energy, energy, energy) or light as (energy, mass, energy)
while appearing as nearly the same, we can see a difference in our middle.
we have to ask ourselves, can we design an experiment to truly prove that light is always massless?
or does it move at a rate so fast it can switch and seem massless?

[Bored chemist]

a hexagon system in water allows compression.

What did you think that meant?
Are you aware that iron is elastic and has a cubic structure?
Neither alcohol, nor mercury has a hexagonal structure, but one is more compressible than water and the other is less so.

oxygen=8,
hydrogen=1
8+1+1=10.
that's why it matters. the atomic number interactions. and the fact that water and life go hand in hand.

Adding bad numerology does not make things better.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

atomic numbers. (counting by electron + proton + neutron, hydrogen=deuterium for this thought.)

oxygen=8
carbon=6
hydrogen=1
ethyl alcohol is C2H5OH

C2 is 12.
H5 is 5
so 17
O is 8
H is 1
17+9
28
28-10=18 (minus neon's stability)
18-10=8 (minus neon's stability)
because our cube is made from a molecule, compression instead of magnetism capabilities is present. (think of hinges or springs)

[Origin]

atomic numbers. (counting by electron + proton + neutron, hydrogen=deuterium for this thought.)

oxygen=8
carbon=6
hydrogen=1
ethyl is C2H5OH

C2 is 12.
H5 is 5
so 17
O is 8
H is 1
17+9
28
28-10=18 (minus neon's stability)
18-10=8 (minus neon's stability)
because our cube is made from a molecule, compression instead of magnetism capabilities is present. (think of hinges or springs)

This seems to be made up numerology and other nonsense.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

Think of mod 3 as atomic where (electron, proton, neutron) is used.
think of mod 6 as quantum. matter and antimatter are positive and negative.

electron=-3,-2,-1,1,2,3 (quarks) (2n=6)
proton=-3,-2,-1,1,2,3 (leptons) (2n=6)
neutron=-2,-1,0,1,2 (bosons) (higgs boson as zero) (2n+1=5)

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

I'm gonna leave this forum alone for a while. As I'm trying to be helpful in expanding the way you guys consider science, which is yet to have a fully functioning total physics model (classical to quantum inlcuded) but people act as if "laws" are set in stone. Fission and fusion are special circumstances. I asked if there was call for another. My apolgoies. I'll take my nonsense elsewhere.
See, the issue is, you guys insult and insinuate that i'm full of it. but look in the mirror, as i ask in possibilities and earn abuse from you. Look back and read it. Imagine it being said to you, repeatedly, as you continue to ask questions, which is what science is about....
then consider your darker days, mentally. ask yourself if you would continue trying on your darker days. See our actions matter. even if a priest told you a man in the sky would forgive you. doesn't mean that your actions don't have consequences, in the here and now. you decide your own conduct. look back and see if its the way you want to be. diminishing open mindedness, and attempts at understanding or would you rather be the type to actually push science by thought. it does less harm then ripping apart particles. particles that help form our time and gravity. each little bit stacks up. thats why collatz is as of yet, unsolved.
Good day gentleman. And I beseech you to find more kindness and patience with people. The condescending behavior should be beneath you.

[Bored chemist]

Let's be clear.
You posted a lot of meaningless nonsense.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

lets be clear. you haven't understood it or worked to understand it. good day sir.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

you admitted to that yourself. you think i'm full of it. so you mainly talked to just talk. to be heard. to see your ego go unchallenged. guess what. i'm still approaching things as i do.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

did you even attempt to understand the notion here?
because you can't find an explanation for cosmologically seemingly free energy.
it infers we may need to recheck some things, to once again rule out possibilities.
you might hear that if you want busy trying to find fault in how i approach things, in ways that you don't wrap your head around well.
realize even Leonardo Da Vinci worked with flower of life. so i'm not using it out of nowhere. its one of the oldest, and most widespread, of ancient math emblems. golden mathematics.

 Leonardo da Vinci (Codex Atlanticus, fol. 307v)