[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

why are you still commenting.

I believe that pointing out that you are posting word salad is better for you, as well as better for the forum.

I've asked you several times. You think just because its a forum it gives you the right to talk down on me because life handed me lemons. Well, bro. It just shows how little you care about what affects you bring to people. if truly down, do you think your continued pressure to shut up would be a healthy thing? no. but your ego prevents that thought. you just don't like what i'm talking about. that's your right. it is not your right, however, to continue harassment. I've blocked you. a clear sign of no longer wanting contact. but yet, here you are replying. I still see and get notified of your reply. I'm asking you, politely, to step away. Please. People have seen your warnings. You did what you set out to do. any further is harassment. Your warnings are not disappearing. congrats. you succeeded in being heard with your stubbornness to consider any possibilities other than what you have learned. Do I need to shut up to not be harassed? that would be bullying.

Any further replies besides apologies for the harassment that has happened already is not warranted, needed, nor appreciated here. You are hijacking scientific discourse because you can't wrap your head around the fact that we don't know if certain things have been swayed by the people who wrote them and are in power.

if electron= 1n
if proton=2n
if neutron=3n
and if 3n=t (time)
t/1
t/2
t/3.
t/2 and t/3 could use a interaction between them to set energy and mass ratio's. 2n+1.
where as:
t/1 (electron)
t/2 (proton)
t/2 (neutron)
would set neutron and proton to the same set. but we see differences in their qualities.  (mass & charge)

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

perpetual motion=cold fusion.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

time travel works through wormholes. but to cross wormhole tails with opposite time intended directions, stops all time.
because time is set by the energy to mass convergence of inertia reserve.

crossing a past portal tail with forward portal tail will destroy time.
matter to antimatter mutual destruction. time is that line.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

So, what i'm saying is, if there is reasonable doubt in the mindset or intentions of those that come before us, shouldn't we have scrutiny based on that possibility, of their statements.
If a perpetual system exists in atoms, do you really think another one can't exist in space?
or would two make more sense. since odds and evens. positive and negative. even energy comes into active force and inertia. but time, what is the opposite of time? without time, we have no universe at all.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

but yet, i'm crazy and not able to be understood. maybe you guys aren't fully considering and putting the time into pontificating what is being asked. could we have been lead astray, with someone intending to lead us astray, if they had access to a way to discern the truth?

now look at voynich manuscript from a
electron=1
proton=2
neutron=3
perspective.
look at papal decrees after it went to rome.
think about the roman dodecahedrons.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

and bored chemist, if you want to listen and learn, feel free. you're invited to do that. you're invited to talk on possibilities that science is slightly off because of us being misled. once we have gotten familiar with each other, you can rip me a new one. not this early in knowing each other. give it time, okay?

because you naysaying is frustrating and will 100%, not help me find my words.

[Origin]

if electron= 1n
if proton=2n
if neutron=3n
and if 3n=t (time)
t/1
t/2
t/3.
t/2 and t/3 could use a interaction between them to set energy and mass ratio's. 2n+1.
where as:
t/1 (electron)
t/2 (proton)
t/2 (neutron)
would set neutron and proton to the same set. but we see differences in their qualities.  (mass & charge)

That makes no sense.  You realize that at one point you say a neutron = time.  This is little more than gibberish.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

if electron= 1n
if proton=2n
if neutron=3n
and if 3n=t (time)
t/1
t/2
t/3.
t/2 and t/3 could use a interaction between them to set energy and mass ratio's. 2n+1.
where as:
t/1 (electron)
t/2 (proton)
t/2 (neutron)
would set neutron and proton to the same set. but we see differences in their qualities.  (mass & charge)

That makes no sense.  You realize that at one point you say a neutron = time.  This is little more than gibberish.

oh yeah? 3n=time= 1 3d movement?

like say t/1+t/2+t/3=t/6
t/6 would be x,-x,y,-y,z,-z for 6. (expansion) (x separates into two rays, so does y and z, meaning from a point we need 6 units of expansion per atomic number that contains electron, proton and neutron)
6. as in deuterium. as in t12=helium.

hey just for fun.
t1+t2+t2=t5
t5*2=t10. helium. (current standard subatomic model)

by the way. collatz conjecture.
3n+1 odds, n/2 evens.
what if the 3 is setting for automatic atomic rollout (a quantum mechanic another words). we are in a 3d environment. lol.
3n+1=10 where n=3
10-1=9 where 9=3^2 (9 is a square in a 2d environment)

maybe this might help.
-0.5 to 0.5 for electron (1n movement)
-1 to 1 for proton (2n movements
-1.5 to 1.5 for neutron (3n movements)

the extra charge is in constant change. making it hard to detect.
set by the entanglement via distance to the electron in the cloud.
e=mc^2
c^2 is its speed, for a complete charge and discharge. it produces 1 mass or 1 energy.
meaning we produce: 1 energy, 1 mass, 1 energy (auto convert to mass), 1 mass(auto convert to energy) 1 energy (auto convert to mass), 1 mass, 1 energy (flip ghost interaction or sound vibrations)

[Origin]

oh yeah? 3n=time= 1 3d movement?

I see you wrote words and numbers but I see no clear meaning.

like say t/1+t/2+t/3=t6

t + t/2 + t/3 does most certainly NOT equal t6.

t6 would be x,-x,y,-y,z,-z for 6. (expansion)
6.

This just looks like more nonsense.  Maybe you could go into more detail?

as in t12=helium.

Since you have defined t as time, the equation t12 = helium is saying (12 x time) = Helium, so this too is nonsense.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

time is a measure of energy output on mass is it not?

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

Once collatz is in n=3, we see our first interaction is
3(3)+1=10
in a 2d plane, dot matrix approach, we see a square can be made with 9, which makes 10 seek a -z to z interaction. as we are past phi as 1.618033, where 2 is aloud because of 1.618033-1=0.618033, 0.618033/2=0.3090165

2-1.618033=0.381967
0.381967-0.3090165=0.0729505 amount of attraction is left.
phi bounds limits comfort past 2, forcing our +1 to go to z plane, positive or negative. if speaking in force based particles.

I'm still working on it, but it includes modifies collatz as x,y interactions
Singularity Particle Systems (hexagonal atom) repeating:
https://www.desmos.com/calculator/jiim8hx4mb
45,46,47
collatz showing only:
https://www.desmos.com/calculator/me1wjvylfo

[Origin]

time is a measure of energy output on mass is it not?

No, it is not.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

what is time, in your words.

When counting, say n. n itself is time. 1 moment of time passes, its now n=2 from n=1. once it passes, it becomes n=3.
because an atom is whole, we can count atoms as time.
deuterium, helium, lithium. (this method shows some time mechanisms.)

because of electron, proton and neutron, we can associate mod 3 as useful.
1/3=dueterium. 2/3=helium. 1=lithium. here we go with squaring again. isn't lithium really sought after for it's use in lithium ion batteries?

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

oh yeah? 3n=time= 1 3d movement?

I see you wrote words and numbers but I see no clear meaning.

like say t/1+t/2+t/3=t6

t + t/2 + t/3 does most certainly NOT equal t6.

t6 would be x,-x,y,-y,z,-z for 6. (expansion)
6.

This just looks like more nonsense.  Maybe you could go into more detail?

as in t12=helium.

Since you have defined t as time, the equation t12 = helium is saying (12 x time) = Helium, so this too is nonsense.

thank you for pointing out my missing division. we humans make mistakes a lot. I learned to backedit to not spam emails on reddit. let me know which is better for corrections like you pointed out.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

I think in a lot of relative ways. So t/1+t/2+t/3=t/6 is the time it takes to move once, vs twice, vs three times.

each has a different rate of movement, but move at a unified overall time. t/6 would be the overall time to generate an electron, proton and neutron.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

imagine black holes sending data to balance a perpetual universe. their light cones could show where they are sending data. data as energy as mass=inertia reserve. all because of being the center of a tesseract.
its then decompressed via deep space (leaving spheres) to cause energy based vibrations, or even ionic atmosphere interactions, if a planet is severely off-balance. a multiverse could hold 64 different times of one universe.
A universe is the border that sets light speed to 2x, a multiverse sets it to 4x. a mega verse to 8x, giga to 16x, and tetra verse has a dark matter border that reflects light.
quantum is akin to 1d (line interaction) if subatomic is 2d and our environment is 3d.
I have plans tonight. I leave in 1 hour. but i'll be back to see if i can clear up my words better.
you might read back to see if things were corrected by me since. if something wasn't clear, I've tried to edit it.

[Origin]

because an atom is whole, we can count atoms as time.

because of electron, proton and neutron, we can associate mod 3 as useful.
1/3=dueterium. 2/3=helium. 1=lithium. here we go with squaring again.

imagine black holes sending data to balance a perpetual universe

A universe is the border that sets light speed to 2x, a multiverse sets it to 4x. a mega verse to 8x, giga to 16x, and tetra verse has a dark matter border that reflects light.

None of this is science or even logical, so I have no idea how to respond.
I guess all I can say is I hope you have a good day and a better tomorrow.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

maybe this will do it. 2 sperate paths for mass.

[KiltedWeirdo (OP)]

If it turns out it's like an onion with millions of layers and we're just sick and tired of looking at the layers, then that's the way it is.
Richard P. Feynman

[Colin2B]

Good for you. You have no problem being a bully and douchebag.

Let’s at least pretend we are keeping it friendly and keep off the name calling.
He has a right to question what you are saying