The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. Biblical Flood
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 13   Go Down

Biblical Flood

  • 251 Replies
  • 38204 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    10.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Biblical Flood
« Reply #20 on: 08/01/2023 10:17:29 »
Quote from: Yaniv on 08/01/2023 09:01:18
Quote from: Bored chemist on 06/01/2023 15:44:06
Quote from: Yaniv on 06/01/2023 14:22:46
In my theory the size of the earth is balanced by opposing forces; gravity and pressure.
That's pretty close to correct.
https://twitter.com/Yaniv_Stern/status/1612007997441556481/photo/1
I would prefer it if you didn't associate a quote from me with a picture of a fairy tale.

You seem not to have understood what I meant.
You say "the size of the earth is balanced by opposing forces; gravity and pressure."
Well,- yes.
And the same is true of a table.
If I make a table out of a piece of wood exactly 5 cm thick and I cut the legs to be exactly 95 cm long then the table will be slightly less than 100 cm tall because the legs will be shortened slightly by the weight of the table-top.

The same is true of the earth.
It is slightly compressed by its own weight.

The effect is small.
But the important thing is that the force of gravity has been shown to be practically constant for at least as long as the earth has existed.
So, since the earth formed and settled down, it has stayed more or less the same size. (It will grow and shrink slightly with changes in temperature).

The magical nonsense you are talking about has nothing to do with reality.


Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



Offline Yaniv (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 299
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
Re: Biblical Flood
« Reply #21 on: 09/01/2023 14:33:51 »
Quote from: Origin on 07/01/2023 15:50:39
So the 'biblical flood' occurred before people or even mammals existed?  The flood you are describing seems different than the flood depicted in the bible.
There was a great flood. We crawled out of it in the Devonian.
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    10.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Biblical Flood
« Reply #22 on: 09/01/2023 18:42:53 »
Quote from: Yaniv on 09/01/2023 14:33:51
We crawled out of it in the Devonian.
Our distant ancestors did, but humans didn't.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline Origin

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2248
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 210 times
  • Nothing of importance
Re: Biblical Flood
« Reply #23 on: 10/01/2023 00:28:04 »
Quote from: Yaniv on 09/01/2023 14:33:51
There was a great flood.
What evidence do you have of this?
Logged
 

Offline Yaniv (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 299
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
Re: Biblical Flood
« Reply #24 on: 10/01/2023 12:24:17 »
Quote from: Origin on 10/01/2023 00:28:04
Quote from: Yaniv on 09/01/2023 14:33:51
There was a great flood.
What evidence do you have of this?
Glacial deposits from snowball earth (dropstones & moraines) were formed by mudflows under water. In time, the mud compacted and cemented into rocks.
« Last Edit: 14/01/2023 09:34:11 by Yaniv »
Logged
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    10.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Biblical Flood
« Reply #25 on: 10/01/2023 12:44:26 »
Quote from: Yaniv on 10/01/2023 12:24:17
Quote from: Origin on 10/01/2023 00:28:04
Quote from: Yaniv on 09/01/2023 14:33:51
There was a great flood.
What evidence do you have of this?
Glacial deposits from snowball earth (dropstones & moraines) were formed by wet mudflows under water. In time, the mud dried up and cemented into rocks.
That's evidence of many small floods, not one big one.
Do you not realise that, if there was actually scientific evidence for the "biblical" flood, it wouldn't be "biblical"?
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline Origin

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2248
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 210 times
  • Nothing of importance
Re: Biblical Flood
« Reply #26 on: 10/01/2023 14:06:10 »
Quote from: Yaniv on 10/01/2023 12:24:17
Glacial deposits from snowball earth (dropstones & moraines) were formed by wet mudflows under water.
How can moraines be both 'glacial deposits' and 'wet mudflows under water'?
Logged
 

Offline Yaniv (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 299
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
Re: Biblical Flood
« Reply #27 on: 10/01/2023 16:46:02 »
Quote from: Origin on 10/01/2023 14:06:10
Quote from: Yaniv on 10/01/2023 12:24:17
Glacial deposits from snowball earth (dropstones & moraines) were formed by wet mudflows under water.
How can moraines be both 'glacial deposits' and 'wet mudflows under water'?
I believe dropstones and moraines from late proterozoic rocks have been formed by mud flows under water. In time the mud was compacted and cemented into stone.
Many geologists interpret dropstones and moraines from late proterozoic rocks as evidence for Snowball Earth. Not in my theory.
« Last Edit: 14/01/2023 06:00:32 by Yaniv »
Logged
 

Offline Origin

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2248
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 210 times
  • Nothing of importance
Re: Biblical Flood
« Reply #28 on: 10/01/2023 18:42:06 »
Quote from: Yaniv on 10/01/2023 16:46:02
I believe dropstones and moraines from late proterozoic rocks have been formed from wet mud flows under water.
Beliefs are nice, but this is a science site, so evidence is what we are looking for.
You also don't need to point out that things that are under water are wet.
Quote from: Yaniv on 10/01/2023 16:46:02
Many geologists interpret these rocks as evidence for Snowball Earth. Not in my theory.
You still don't have a theory, you have a conjecture.
Logged
 



Offline The Spoon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 793
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 18 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
Re: Biblical Flood
« Reply #29 on: 10/01/2023 19:28:46 »
Quote from: Yaniv on 10/01/2023 16:46:02
Quote from: Origin on 10/01/2023 14:06:10
Quote from: Yaniv on 10/01/2023 12:24:17
Glacial deposits from snowball earth (dropstones & moraines) were formed by wet mudflows under water.
How can moraines be both 'glacial deposits' and 'wet mudflows under water'?
I believe dropstones and moraines from late proterozoic rocks have been formed from wet mud flows under water. As sea levels dropped sedimentary mud beds dried up and hardened into rocks.
Many geologists interpret these rocks as evidence for Snowball Earth. Not in my theory.
Which geologists? Provide references.
Logged
 

Offline Yaniv (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 299
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
Re: Biblical Flood
« Reply #30 on: 11/01/2023 01:48:45 »
Quote from: The Spoon on 10/01/2023 19:28:46
Which geologists? Provide references.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snowball_Earth
Logged
 

Offline Colin2B

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6476
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 708 times
Re: Biblical Flood
« Reply #31 on: 11/01/2023 03:34:00 »
Quote from: Yaniv on 10/01/2023 16:46:02
Glacial deposits from snowball earth (dropstones & moraines) were formed by wet mudflows under water.
Mudflows underwater have a very different flow pattern to those on land.
The flow underwater does not form moraines in the same patterns as formed by glaciers. This is particularly true of terminal and lateral moraines which are similar to debris piled up by either a bulldozer or plough where the ice has displaced the debris and then melted. This pattern does not occur underwater because the saturated mud does not pile in the same way, but is flatter; also there is no equivalent of ice to melt and leave isolated piles.
Logged
and the misguided shall lead the gullible,
the feebleminded have inherited the earth.
 

Offline Yaniv (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 299
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
Re: Biblical Flood
« Reply #32 on: 11/01/2023 07:05:41 »
My theory posits the sun was hotter in the past and discards faint young sun paradoxes.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faint_young_Sun_paradox
Logged
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    10.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Biblical Flood
« Reply #33 on: 11/01/2023 08:48:11 »
Quote from: Yaniv on 11/01/2023 07:05:41
My theory
Quote from: Origin on 06/01/2023 15:39:30
You don't have a theory, you have a conjecture.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 06/01/2023 15:44:06
also has an error.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 07/01/2023 13:49:14
You don't have a theory.
Stop pretending you do.
Quote from: Origin on 10/01/2023 18:42:06
You still don't have a theory, you have a conjecture.

Please stop telling the lie that you have a theory.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 8082
  • Activity:
    1.5%
  • Thanked: 514 times
Re: Biblical Flood
« Reply #34 on: 11/01/2023 16:29:13 »
Quote from: Yaniv on 11/01/2023 07:05:41
My theory posits the sun was hotter in the past and discards faint young sun paradoxes.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faint_young_Sun_paradox

You still haven't addressed this:

Quote from: Kryptid on 07/01/2023 16:38:33
Quote from: Yaniv on 07/01/2023 07:48:13
https://www.nasa.gov/feature/jpl/new-clues-about-how-ancient-galaxies-lit-up-the-universe

Assuming, for the sake of argument, that this study is evidence for brighter stars 13 billion years ago, that in no way contradicts the study I posted. What I posted shows that there is no evidence for a change in the gravitational constant over the past 9 billion years, whereas this link you posted is about a time period well before that. The Earth has only been around for about 4.5 billion years. So the study I posted earlier covers the entire time that Earth has been here while the one you posted does not.
Logged
 

Offline Yaniv (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 299
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
Re: Biblical Flood
« Reply #35 on: 11/01/2023 19:35:39 »
Quote from: Origin on 10/01/2023 00:28:04
Quote from: Yaniv on 09/01/2023 14:33:51
There was a great flood.
What evidence do you have of this?
Most fossils form in water when organisms are buried under a thick layer of mud. Fossils of marine animals such as trilobites and ammonites are found on all continents indicating during the paleozoic and mesozoic eras large parts of the continents must have been submerged under the sea.   
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    10.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Biblical Flood
« Reply #36 on: 11/01/2023 19:48:51 »
Quote from: Yaniv on 11/01/2023 19:35:39
Quote from: Origin on 10/01/2023 00:28:04
Quote from: Yaniv on 09/01/2023 14:33:51
There was a great flood.
What evidence do you have of this?
Most fossils form in water when organisms are buried under a thick layer of mud. Fossils of marine animals such as trilobites and ammonites are found on all continents indicating during the paleozoic and mesozoic eras large parts of the continents must have been submerged under the sea.   
Quote from: Bored chemist on 10/01/2023 12:44:26
That's evidence of many small floods, not one big one.
Do you not realise that, if there was actually scientific evidence for the "biblical" flood, it wouldn't be "biblical"?
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



Offline Yaniv (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 299
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
Re: Biblical Flood
« Reply #37 on: 11/01/2023 20:01:21 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 11/01/2023 19:48:51
That's evidence of many small floods, not one big one.
Where is the rest of the water ?
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    10.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Biblical Flood
« Reply #38 on: 11/01/2023 20:37:30 »
There was roughly as much water then as there is today.
Most of  it is in oceans and seas.

Why did you not realise that?
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline Yaniv (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 299
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
Re: Biblical Flood
« Reply #39 on: 11/01/2023 20:59:06 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 11/01/2023 20:37:30
There was roughly as much water then as there is today.
Most of  it is in oceans and seas.

Why did you not realise that?
Did you read the age of the ocean basins ? The oceans did not exist before the mesozoic era.
https://www.bing.com/images/search?view=detailV2&ccid=ujTaSEBh&id=69837669841F54336997C97E460E92111A8F1AFB&thid=OIP.ujTaSEBh-qlpH905DQEqTQHaEc&mediaurl=https%3a%2f%2fwww.thoughtco.com%2fthmb%2f5x28WHk9dBDittWH5buj2R0o9_k%3d%2f2560x1539%2ffilters%3afill(auto%2c1)%2f2008_age_of_oceans_noplates-58b5a1943df78cdcd87e6818.jpg&cdnurl=https%3a%2f%2fth.bing.com%2fth%2fid%2fR.ba34da484061faa9691fdd390d012a4d%3frik%3d%252bxqPGhGSDkZ%252byQ%26pid%3dImgRaw%26r%3d0&exph=1539&expw=2560&q=age+of+seafloor&simid=608043416895315159&FORM=IRPRST&ck=4344573AB4BD3C73F1C16AF6B7A9F51C&selectedIndex=0&ajaxhist=0&ajaxserp=0
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 13   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.414 seconds with 70 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.