[Zer0]

The considered microgrid is larger or smaller, but it is certainly very fine.

Hmmm...how Fine would you say?
Even nicer than W?dka eh?
(lol)

Anyways, can the Microgrid Stretch & Bend?
Or can it Rip & Tear?

[cpu68 (OP)]

can the Microgrid Stretch & Bend?

It can probably bend, it is not known if it can stretch.

[Kryptid]

can the Microgrid Stretch & Bend?

It can probably bend, it is not known if it can stretch.

Gravitational waves passing through space make it stretch and contract. That's how we detect them via LIGO and VIRGO.

[cpu68 (OP)]

Gravitational waves passing through space make it stretch and contract

Thank you for this insight, it's helpful.

[cpu68 (OP)]

In my philosophical concept, I assume that the microgrid of space which looks like a computer simulation is half a mental phenomenon and half a material (spatial) phenomenon. However, it may be that the mind has a smaller role in this phenomenon and occupies approximately one third of the phenomenon. But it may also be that the mind has a greater share in this phenomenon and takes up approximately two-thirds of the phenomenon. The way to avoid these fluctuations between one option and the other is to adopt a half-and-half split, as I did.

[Bored chemist]

In my philosophical concept, I assume that the microgrid of space which looks like a computer simulation is half a mental phenomenon and half a material (spatial) phenomenon. However, it may be that the mind has a smaller role in this phenomenon and occupies approximately one third of the phenomenon. But it may also be that the mind has a greater share in this phenomenon and takes up approximately two-thirds of the phenomenon. The way to avoid these fluctuations between one option and the other is to adopt a half-and-half split, as I did.

Have you found actual evidence that the correct extent to which the mind is involved is not, in fact, zero?
Can you show it's not just some thing you made up?

[cpu68 (OP)]

Have you found actual evidence that the correct extent to which the mind is involved is not, in fact, zero?
Can you show it's not just some thing you made up?

There is a possibility that the participation of the mind is zero. However, the microgrid considered looks like a computer or mental simulation. The issue still requires research.

[Origin]

There is a possibility that the participation of the mind is zero. However, the microgrid considered looks like a computer or mental simulation.

Just in case you were wondering posting a meaningless series of words is not considered science.

[Bored chemist]

However, the microgrid considered...

Remember; it's not real.

[cpu68 (OP)]

One might wonder whether gravitons are bulges of space or are embedded in it as independent particles. I chose the first option.

[cpu68 (OP)]

The symbol of matter is a ball (circle). Let's take planets, stars, atoms and particles

[Origin]

The symbol of matter is a ball (circle). Let's take planets, stars, atoms and particles

Since you have a TOE, how about you use it to calculate something, anything would fine.

[cpu68 (OP)]

The symbol of matter is a ball (circle). Let's take planets, stars, atoms and particles. The flat shape of the galaxy encodes the hidden nature of the cosmos, which is flat. Nothingness in the form of space simply takes a different form, also a microgrid. Although in some perspective the space is completely empty, i.e. it is nothing. The microgrid is a condensed form of nothingness. The square shape of the microgrid follows from the order of geometric forms, one of the basic geometric forms is the square. Reduction of all processes to basic geometric forms can be justified. Above the microgrid, i.e. space-time, or rather spacetimematter, there is a sphere of simple, ideal geometric forms (this concept resembles the Platonic doctrine, except that it does not contain abstract ideas). All phenomena can be reduced to geometry and ultimately to nothingness.

[cpu68 (OP)]

The current concepts in physics, such as string theory, are fundamentally false and are the result of exuberant speculation divorced from reality.

[cpu68 (OP)]

Some power may reside in nothingness and she (nothingness) may have certain zones.

[cpu68 (OP)]

So matter is made of space and space is made of nothingness.

[cpu68 (OP)]

Gravitons are the smallest particles.

[cpu68 (OP)]

My concept of STM - spacetimematter shows that matter can be smoothly converted into vacuum (space), and vacuum (space) can be smoothly converted into matter. We obtain an analogous approach in the case of microgrid. In this way, all the necessary components of all chemical and physical substances can be obtained. In order to prevent shortages in the resources of certain material substances in the future, it will be possible to use such a conceived synthesis from vacuum (space), i.e. direct synthesis from microgrid. After obtaining the simplest matter from microgrid, it can then be synthesized into heavier matter and so on to atomic matter with any selected characteristics.
Of course, after the exhaustion of natural resources after about a thousand years of technical culture, one can imagine the synthesis of appropriate substrates from rocks. This would be a transfer of matter from rocks to matter with any selected characteristics. Of course, this form of synthesis from rocks will be less technically sophisticated and easier than synthesis from microgrid.

[cpu68 (OP)]

Among ancient theories, apart from atomism, we can find another one equally useful theory created by the Greek sophist Gorgias who lived in the 5th century BC, which turns out to be helpful in searching for the TOE. In the work On Non-Existence we can find the first thesis of this theory: nothing exists. This concept may seem correct from the point of view of the theory of space as a basis, this nothingness of Gorgias would be the emptiness of space, the vacuum. So nothingness could be understood as a vacuum. This is a weaker version of the concept of nothingness. A stronger version would assume true nothingness as a basis, but in this respect the role of God should be preferred.

[paul cotter]

If there is nothing, as you suggest, then your theories/hypotheses/conjectures do not exist.