0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Evidently gold which is the best conductor
One thing we can say about the nucleus is it must be similar to earth in that it creates and internal stationary heat from pressure. T
the surrounding aether
For its size we can probably assume the nucleus is very dense and small and hot.
Two out of three.It's not hot.
Please state how I'm wrong that pressure heat is different then radiating heat?
How are you defining them to be different?
When you heat something with pressure, its not an endless source of radiating heat.
The heat created by the substance remains within the substance
and if it is removed the substance re absorbs it.
The heat radiates away but not when its created by pressure.
Tell me if putting pressure on a substance causes radiating not stationary heat, then why don't we use substances under pressure to boil water?
I have clearly defined why I believe this arguement about pressure heat.
One thing we can say about the nucleus is it must be similar to earth in that it creates and internal stationary heat from pressure
That's why I ignore most of your comments.
You have made up an idea of "stationary heat" which makes no sense because all form of heat involve the movement of particles.
Its not conventional radiating heat in the center of the earth.
The proximity of the atom's to one anotherr causes their gravity fields to retract
and heat up the nucleus and space around it.
Retraction of a gravity field thusly causes light to move through it slower and time dilation.
It;s all about heat caused by the pressure on the center. That's what brings mass together, stars, fusion, the evolution of forward moving energy.,,
Magnets are similar. When you pack a great number of magnetic atom's in close range, the magnetic field bulges out and makes the magnetic field around the magnet.
Yes it is. It just gets absorbed by the surrounding material. If you were to peel the outer layers of the Earth away, the core would glow brightly and radiate heat quite readily into space (as very hot metal should).
It;s all about heat caused by the pressure on the center.
If you took off the layers of weight the core wouldn't be hot at all.
Still the same picture 7 years later
Quote from: trevorjohnson32 on 31/08/2023 07:49:59If you took off the layers of weight the core wouldn't be hot at all.Yes it would. The heat in the core wouldn't just vanish. That is something guaranteed by the first law of thermodynamics.
Quote from: trevorjohnson32 on 31/08/2023 01:06:57It;s all about heat caused by the pressure on the center. Pressure does not cause heat.This will remain true no matter how often you try to claim otherwise.
So you honestly believe the core is slowly producing heat through radioactive decay and then slowly releasing it through the crust.
In the meantime the radiating heat is just sitting in the core waiting to be released through what? a volcano?
Tell me what object can you heat up to molten temperatures in the center, and still be able to hold it because 90% of it is 'blanketing' the molten center making its shell room temperature?
Dinosaurs.