[cpu68 (OP)]

The genetic code of the universe encodes life and intelligence (compare the anthropic principle). The explanation for the emergence of intelligence can be achieved by going back to the origins of the cosmos. Our cosmos likely exists within a network of cosmoses, a model of which could be the microgrid of my TOE (Newest Quantum Gravity and Theory of Everything, TOE - https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=86332.0). Because subquark particles correspond to the structure of galaxy and the cosmos (the smallest ones) - (Structure of electrons, quarks and gluons; preon, preons - https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=86090.0), what lies deeper beneath them may correspond to a supercosmic structure. And there is a network there. It's possible it's a network of tunnels emerging from certain black holes. I should add that there are not an infinite number of cosmoses, but probably as many as there are galaxies in the cosmos, i.e., approximately 400 billion. Thus, the cosmoses form a network of interconnections, but they are not parallel cosmoses. Given these assumptions, we should go back to the beginnings of the first cosmos, from which the others began to form. According to my concept of ideomaterialism (The main philosophical opposition Idealism - Materialism, how to solve ? - https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=87214.0), consciousness occupies half of reality, so some form of consciousness and intelligence may have participated in the formation of the first cosmos. This would explain the genetic code of the universe.

Gregory Podgorniak, Poland, year 2024

[alancalverd]

An infinite number of monkeys will eventually type out the complete works of Shakespeare. Or indeed any other literature that you consider significant.

An infinite universe will eventually produce a monkey, and you presumably consider monkeys like yourself to be significant.

No need for an external creator - it's an inevitable and transient excresence of lots of physics and chemistry happening for a long time.

[Bored chemist]

probably initiated by a very highly developed

Probably not.

[paul cotter]

Almost certainly not.

[cpu68 (OP)]

An infinite universe will eventually produce a monkey

What if the supercosmos is not infinite ?
As the analysis of my models of subquark matter and microgrid (see Structure of electrons, quarks and gluons; preon, preons - https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=86090.0 and Newest Quantum Gravity and Theory of Everything, TOE - https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=86332.0) indicates, the number of cosmoses can be estimated at about 400 billion, which is as many as there are galaxies in universe. If the number of universes were infinite, for example gravitons, would have to be infinitesimal and they certainly are not. I estimated their sizes logically, and based on these estimates, the number of universes should match the number of galaxies.

[Kryptid]

This would explain the genetic code of the universe.

When was the Universe observed to have a genetic code?

[cpu68 (OP)]

When was the Universe observed to have a genetic code?

This is just a metaphorical approach to certain problem.

[paul cotter]

Then it is not science.

[cpu68 (OP)]

There is a network.

[Origin]

The hypothesis I have presented may contain certain weakness.

I think the main weakness is that it is a wild assed guess that has no evidence to back it up and it is untestable. 

[alancalverd]

What if the supercosmos is not infinite ?

Then you would have to state what is outside it. For any number N < infinity you can determine the characteristics of  N + 1.

[cpu68 (OP)]

Then you would have to state what is outside it

Nothingness

[alancalverd]

Which makes expansion inevitable. If stuff inside has nonzero kinetic energy, stuff at the edges is more likely to move outwards (where there's more room and nothing to collide with) rather than inwards.

[set fair]

If you think there is mystery in or to the anthropic principle, then you have misunderstood it. The anthropic principle removes the mystery of why creatures which can observe the universe exist. It doesn't imply that there is no creator, nor does it deny that something is behind inteligent life, it asserts that neither of these are nescessary and without them or anything similar it is not suprising that we are here and can observe and understand so much of the universe.

The idea that intelligent life from outside our universe created our universe is not new. It may well even predate our species.

[Bogie_smiles]

The genetic code of the universe encodes life and intelligence (compare the anthropic principle). The explanation for the emergence of intelligence can be achieved by going back to the origins of the cosmos. Our cosmos was probably initiated by a very highly developed planetary culture from another cosmos. This would explain the genetic code of the universe.

Gregory Podgorniak, Poland, year 2023

That scenario about our cosmos being initiated by a source from a different and highly developed cosmos raises a question related to infinite regression, i.e. how did the first cosmos begin and how did it get any genetic codes?

[cpu68 (OP)]

If you think there is mystery in or to the anthropic principle, then you have misunderstood it.

No, I understand it.

[Origin]

I would even propose creating a new religion of Nothingness.

Is nothing sacred?

[cpu68 (OP)]

Is nothing sacred?

Yes it is.

[paul cotter]

Nothing more need be said then.

[cpu68 (OP)]

If we were looking for an answer to the mystery of the anthropic principle, the first answer that comes to mind is a some form of intelligence.