[Bored chemist]

I'm proposing to change the STANDARD unit for torque in order to make it consistent with other rotational quantities.

And, if you think that has any hope of being adopted, it is evidence of a fault in your reasoning.

What's your reason to come to that conclusion?
Haven't you ever found any new standard? Or a standard being changed?

I have actually worked on the creation of international standards and it's safe to assume you have not.
To the best of my understanding, none was ever changed because "some guy of the internet says we are all wrong".

[hamdani yusuf (OP)]

This is my first video about rotational quantities.

[hamdani yusuf (OP)]

Since τ = I α while α = 0, and τ ≠ 0,
Then I = ∞

So you really need to review your understanding of torque, because  I have described exactly what happens when you tighten a bolt.

You can't argue against math.

[hamdani yusuf (OP)]

I have actually worked on the creation of international standards and it's safe to assume you have not.
To the best of my understanding, none was ever changed because "some guy of the internet says we are all wrong".

I don't think I can find your name there, so I won't know for sure.

To change a standard, saying that everyone is wrong isn't enough. It needs to be supported by strong evidence and argumentation to demonstrate that the new standard is more useful than the old one.

[alancalverd]

So far you have merely demonstrated that you wish to create a new quantity with dimensions of force x distance /angle and give it a name that everyone already uses for something else. You have not demonstrated any actual use for it.

[hamdani yusuf (OP)]

So far you have merely demonstrated that you wish to create a new quantity with dimensions of force x distance /angle and give it a name that everyone already uses for something else. You have not demonstrated any actual use for it.

Based on the equations widely used by everyone, it's called torque. It's also called rotational force, which is mouthful.
The actual use is to calculate motor power from torque and angular velocity with consistent and unambiguous units, among other.

[hamdani yusuf (OP)]

I'd like to remind you that rotational quantities don't exist in isolation. They are related to one another through corresponding equations.
In my video, at timestamp 4:30, you can see in the table, there are 3 units of rotational quantities that I proposed to change. They are rotational inertia, rotational momentum, and rotational force, aka torque.

[Bored chemist]

To change a standard, saying that everyone is wrong isn't enough. It needs to be supported by strong evidence and argumentation to demonstrate that the new standard is more useful than the old one.

And you have not got close to doing that.

[Bored chemist]

I don't think I can find your name there

Where?

[alancalverd]

The actual use is to calculate motor power from torque and angular velocity

P = τω.  If ω is in rad/sec, no conversion coefficients are required for SI units. What could be simpler? 

[hamdani yusuf (OP)]

To change a standard, saying that everyone is wrong isn't enough. It needs to be supported by strong evidence and argumentation to demonstrate that the new standard is more useful than the old one.

And you have not got close to doing that.

A thousand miles journey starts with a single step.

[hamdani yusuf (OP)]

creation of international standards

List of authors in a creation of international standards.

[hamdani yusuf (OP)]

The actual use is to calculate motor power from torque and angular velocity

P = τω.  If ω is in rad/sec, no conversion coefficients are required for SI units. What could be simpler? 

Why the radian doesn't show up in the unit of power?

[hamdani yusuf (OP)]

Dot product between force and distance produces energy, which is a scalar. Cross product between force and distance from fulcrum produces torque, which is a vector.

The difference between dot product and cross product is shown in these videos.

[hamdani yusuf (OP)]

Conservation of Angular Momentum

Springfield College physics laboratory instructor, Jeff Gagnon, demonstrates the Conservation of Angular Momentum to his students.

[Bored chemist]

List of authors in a creation of international standards.

Is there such a list available?

[Bored chemist]

To change a standard, saying that everyone is wrong isn't enough. It needs to be supported by strong evidence and argumentation to demonstrate that the new standard is more useful than the old one.

And you have not got close to doing that.

A thousand miles journey starts with a single step.

Only if it's in the right direction.

[alancalverd]

List of authors in a creation of international standards.

I have worked on two series of international standards, as contributing editor. We never published any names.

Now and again a person's name appears as a quantity, e.g. joule, sievert...or is mentioned in the practical definition of a unit (the Kibble balance...)

[alancalverd]

Why the radian doesn't show up in the unit of power?

Because it is irrelevant. A watt is a watt.

[Bored chemist]

I have worked on two series of international standards, as contributing editor. We never published any names

Indeed.
If anyone is interested...
In EUR%2020989%20EN.pdf
here
https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC24469

I'm not allowed to tell you which lab number is me.

(And this is the internet; there's no real way to verify my claim)