1
Just Chat! / Re: Where do I get my confidence to challenge established theories?
« on: Yesterday at 23:44:47 »
he thoughts of a very mediocre mind:
A lot of what you call unsolved problems are not problems but misunderstandings.
It's no big deal that some folk don't know the difference between diffraction and interference. At least anyone who has studied a bit of physics can use a Huygens construction to predict what you see.
There is no twin paradox, only a dogmatic reluctance to accept that classical mechanics is just a limiting case of relativistic mechanics.
Why should gravity and electromagnetism be related at all?
The goal of any machine is determined by its creator. The only problem with AI is determining exactly who is legally liable for its output, and that will be resolved by a decision in a court of law.
A lot of what you call unsolved problems are not problems but misunderstandings.
It's no big deal that some folk don't know the difference between diffraction and interference. At least anyone who has studied a bit of physics can use a Huygens construction to predict what you see.
There is no twin paradox, only a dogmatic reluctance to accept that classical mechanics is just a limiting case of relativistic mechanics.
Why should gravity and electromagnetism be related at all?
what is the universal terminal goal?Wrong starting point. Why assume that there is or should be one? Anyway, ΔS > 0, whatever.
there are still persistent disagreements among philosophers.without which, there would be no work for philosophers. Ethics and morality are human constructs, and change with time. Hardly worth the attention of a scientist, though it pays to know what is currently acceptable.
The goal of any machine is determined by its creator. The only problem with AI is determining exactly who is legally liable for its output, and that will be resolved by a decision in a court of law.