1
New Theories / Re: How does light propagate? By what means does light get from Point A To Point B?
« on: 09/05/2024 17:09:45 »If c is constant, wouldn't the edge of observable universe be invisible?
It basically is.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
If c is constant, wouldn't the edge of observable universe be invisible?
If a mistake was made here then a theory built on it will fall.
Even if you choose another light wave.
How does the light inertial frame calculate time with the Lorentz transformation?
How did you answer your own question from the other thread?
This is not about motionless light waves but about Einstein's flawed assumption.
The carriage cannot move at v=c.
That frame does not exist, it is undefined according to the Lorentz transformation, right?
My conclusions are correct, there is no real physical inertial frame with mass that moves at c.
Is there any experiment with mass moving at c?
An experiment that disproves my conclusion?
Expect an experiment of a mass moving at v=c.
That's what Einstein was thinking according to Susskind.
Susskind specifically talks about railroad carriage moving with the speed of light in Einstein's thought experiment.
The conclusion in your thread is that frame is undefined under the Lorentz transformation.
Special relativity has been supported with large amounts of experimental evidence.
Apparently Einstein was troubled with similar thoughts.
If we believe the book then Einstein screwed up his conclusion compared to what is proposed here, right?
Fully populated 1s shell.Do you think that electrons shared by H2 don't fully populated 1s shell?
Perhaps it's because the speed of light is defined to be a constant, and spacetime is defined so that its expansion doesn't change the speed of light.
The required characteristics of a standard is consistency from time to time. Its value in the past should be the same as its value in the future.
H2O. The reaction only needs a small spark.
Even H2 can change into something else quite easily.
The best way to overturn an established theory is to come up with a better theory. Either by being more generally applicable, or by being simpler by using less assumptions.
With the same success it can be argued that cyclones and anticyclones consist of stars
If we insist that speed of light in vacuum is constant while also accepting that space is stretching, it implies that we also need to stretch the time by the same amount. So far, I haven't found any source for the latter.
Please rate this post too:
The statement that galaxies are moving apart does not stand up to criticism, because galaxies are single stars that are located behind the nebula.
1. Due to what forces does the Universe expand and contract?
Without answers to these questions, the Big Bang hypothesis has no right to exist.
a) At the same time, the expansion of the Universe is hampered by mass and gravity.
b) The compression of the Universe is prevented by rotation and centrifugal force.
2. It is believed that the Universe is expanding, along with the Solar system.
a) Does the diameter and thickness of the Solar System change?
b) Are the diameters of planets and the distance between planets increasing?
d) Where is dark matter located in the Solar System?
e) Is there an equation for dark energy, and in what units is dark energy measured?
Can it be described in a single paragraph?
For one, a pair of protons isn't going to randomly join together to form a single nucleus because the Coulomb barrier is too strong to overcome at common temperatures and pressures. So they remain separate. The number of nuclei dictates the total number of atoms. The electrons then arrange themselves in the lowest energy configuration around those nuclei.
Under the expanding universe model, speed of light doesn't seem to be a constant, especially over a long distance.