21
New Theories / Re: NFEU MODEL
« on: 31/08/2018 13:02:39 »Divide a dot of energy by a piece of string,Srsly?
The following users thanked this post: Kryptid
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Divide a dot of energy by a piece of string,Srsly?
This is like a child saying 'you can't speak to my imaginary friend because they use a language that only I can understand'.Which proves that you are a mathematically illiterate fool.
I don't mean to sound rude, but obviously you do not understand if you think the maths is meaningless and illiterate. The maths works with my conceptual envision I have explained with theory . The NFEU model does not ignore present Physics, to the contrary the model is based on some of the present physics such as Coulombs law, space-time and Dirac. I think you are possibly not considering Alpha or Beta point energy particle manifestations , popping into and out of existence , the dissipate resulting in dispersion to 0 value.
If my notion is so wrong, then why isn't there a single attempt to falsify my notions?Because people have learned by past experience it is just pigeon chess.
To:KryptidAs already noted the Earth Moon barycenter doesn't shift due to the tidal acceleration of the Moon.
Must have logic , live by it !
Speaking of planetary systems , how do you like that Earth-Moon system ? Much of Earth's initial angular momentum has been transferred to Luna , BUT much of it was converted to heat in the process . Were it a perfect transfer , the E.-M. system would be in a different location , with a different momentum . If you now spun the Earth in the opposite direction , the opposite effect would occur . Bottom line , destroying energy of momentum works as well as removing mass. Sounds like a propellantless rocket to me !
Hokay , next victim ! P.M.
P.S.-" l'm freakin' Bobby Fisher ! "
You answered only two questionsLearn to count, or stop being silly.
I understand electric fields quite well, there isn't much I don't know about QFT.LOL
and nobody in his right mind considers death to be a bad thing.
You are saying death is a good thing?
Good.The first major problem is that you don't know what a Tesla coil does.That called spamming dude.
There's no point to any further discussion until that's sorted out.
In your political correct terms Tesla coil
noun
a form of induction coil for producing high-frequency alternating currents.
Your just being stupid again, are you drinking? being a bot? or just always this much of a fool?
Why very often as I've just drifted off to sleep do I awake feeling like something has bumped my bed ...
I feel there must be a scientific explanation for this as opposed to some energy force disturbing me.
My N-field theoryIt's not a theory.
Whereas you stated on your N Field thread that:attached is a pdf presentation proposing a hypothesis that tries to quantize gravity
1+1=2
Couldn't be more simpler
A rain drop fell into my cup, a second raindrop fell into my cupAt least try to to keep your attention seeking consistent.
1+1 = 1
Only in your dreams are you smarter than me
Over a million or billion year interval the photons coming from a star or galaxy have to miss every intervening particle or rock or comet. How do all those photons get through?Let's look at some numbers. The density of the local cloud of the interstellar medium has a density of ~0.1 particle per cc.
Like I said, you can't challenge me on time because I am the ''master'' on time and space and if Einstein was here today he would concede to me.
Clandestine solar geoengineering is no conspiracy nonsense.For the umpteenth time; prove it, or shut up about it.
In my theory ground electrons are in motion and could provide a force to accelerate an absorbed electron.Then you don't know what a ground state is.
Energy is at its densest at the central point of sphericalisation. Following the inverse square law , the wave energy weakens over a distance . The strong force is always central where the weakened force is dynamic and drops off over a distance to where 0 applies.
E= where S is equal to 0³ of space.
You truly know your chemistry, I never argue with chemistry I think it is quite genius. I have no other explanation so I accept your explanation that even us are made of atoms.They do not have generic code that tells them where to be placed either.
The reason that planets and stars are spherical is because the strength of gravity overwhelms the compressive strength of the materials that they are made of, forcing them into shapes with a minimum of gravitational potential energy. Chemistry has nothing to do with their shape (unlike with living things, where chemistry is all-important).
If our Solar System is any indication of what other star systems are like, then the vast majority of macroscopic objects in the Universe are not spherical but have an irregular shape (look at how many asteroids there are versus how many planets there are).QuoteWhere in humans the formation is much more complex. Does dna tell the atoms where to go?
DNA, along with the necessary enzymes, are indeed responsible for "telling" a lot of other atoms where to go. Sometimes it's direct and sometimes it isn't. The formation of a messenger RNA strand along an open strand of DNA is determined directly by chemical laws whereby certain ribonucleotides fit better with their corresponding deoxyribonucleotides via hydrogen bonds than others. This naturally leads to the formation of the required RNA strand. Similar laws allow the sequence of ribonucleotides in RNA to be translated into peptides by assembling amino acids. These peptides include enzymes, which are selectively-shaped to catalyze specific chemical reactions but not others. Some things are not determined directly by DNA alone, but by epigenetic effects (i.e. cues from the outside environment that affect how DNA is expressed, which lead to modified DNA function without necessarily incurring a genetic mutation).
Some things, however, occur without DNA having to "tell" it how to work. The phospholipid bilayer of a cell membrane forms due to chemical laws that make the polar ends of the molecule attracted to the water it is immersed in while the non-polar ends are attracted to each other (like attracts like). The lowest energy configuration for this is roughly spherical, so many cell membranes are naturally spherical (although other molecules present in the membrane can alter the shape radically in some types of cells). It's all down to chemistry.
Of course, the arrangement of these molecules is of critical importance. If you put a human in a blender, all of the same molecules will be present after the blending process but the soup will no longer be alive nor will it spontaneously come to life. The atoms have not been changed by the blending, so obviously there is nothing special about the atoms themselves that made the original human alive: it was their arrangement.