The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. The N-field
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 ... 38 39 [40] 41 42 ... 48   Go Down

The N-field

  • 946 Replies
  • 214833 Views
  • 3 Tags

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

guest45734

  • Guest
Re: The N-field
« Reply #780 on: 03/04/2018 14:11:36 »
Quote from: Thebox on 03/04/2018 14:01:32

* scales.jpg (29.59 kB . 836x464 - viewed 7047 times)

I do not have any obsessive desire or compulsion to prove N theory right wrong, it is clearly beyond my understanding of the universe, so will not comment further. 
Logged
 



guest39538

  • Guest
Re: The N-field
« Reply #781 on: 03/04/2018 14:14:35 »
Quote from: disinterested on 03/04/2018 14:11:36
Quote from: Thebox on 03/04/2018 14:01:32

* scales.jpg (29.59 kB . 836x464 - viewed 7047 times)

I do not have any obsessive desire or compulsion to prove N theory right wrong, it is clearly beyond my understanding of the universe, so will not comment further. 
No worries ,  it is complex.
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    11.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: The N-field
« Reply #782 on: 03/04/2018 18:53:59 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 29/03/2018 02:18:56
Quote from: The Spoon on 27/03/2018 20:26:08
Incorrect, you have demonstrated constantly that you can not think beyond your subjective education.
Nope.
My education-  subjective or otherwise- didn't train me to deal with idiots online.
It couldn't aspire to do so, given that it finished in 1988, at which point there essentially wasn't an internet.

So the facts show that you are wrong..
I await with mild amusement your shift in reality which will let you pretend you were right all along.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: The N-field
« Reply #783 on: 03/04/2018 20:21:45 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 03/04/2018 18:53:59
Quote from: Bored chemist on 29/03/2018 02:18:56
Quote from: The Spoon on 27/03/2018 20:26:08
Incorrect, you have demonstrated constantly that you can not think beyond your subjective education.
Nope.
My education-  subjective or otherwise- didn't train me to deal with idiots online.
It couldn't aspire to do so, given that it finished in 1988, at which point there essentially wasn't an internet.

So the facts show that you are wrong..
I await with mild amusement your shift in reality which will let you pretend you were right all along.

So what qualifies you to define an idiot if you were not trained in how to deal with idiots? 

An idiot would be your subjective opinion yet again as you admitted being untrained in dealing with idiots so therefore have no qualification to call somebody an idiot.

I can teach you how to deal with idiots if you like and the way  is
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    11.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: The N-field
« Reply #784 on: 04/04/2018 02:39:07 »
Quote from: Thebox on 03/04/2018 20:21:45
So what qualifies you to define an idiot
I didn't.
Quote from: Thebox on 03/04/2018 20:21:45
An idiot would be your subjective opinion
Nope; I have evidence.
Quote from: Thebox on 03/04/2018 20:21:45
An idiot would be your subjective opinion yet again as you admitted being untrained in dealing with idiots so therefore have no qualification to call somebody an idiot.
I can recognise German.
I can't speak it.

I can recognise idiocy.
I was never taught to deal with it  on line.
(BTW- you seem to be engaging in intellectual dishonesty again by failing to make the  point about  my education referring to " idiots on line".)

Quote from: Thebox on 03/04/2018 20:21:45
I can teach you how to deal with idiots if you like and the way  is

As seems to happen a lot, your post makes no sense. It promises, but fails to deliver.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



guest39538

  • Guest
Re: The N-field
« Reply #785 on: 08/04/2018 22:04:25 »
ΔZPE= 15cca12530c34e26d2614c5aa81e4708.gif + ee3f7b92e7ab06f593e45e87094b3239.gif  = 6f6d5d3434fc41a1bc38ee9f0d282c1e.gif = dc584df1a8bc9ae2b6daa0f3f7769811.gif

Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    11.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: The N-field
« Reply #786 on: 09/04/2018 20:37:02 »
Quote from: Thebox on 08/04/2018 22:04:25
ΔZPE= 15cca12530c34e26d2614c5aa81e4708.gif + ee3f7b92e7ab06f593e45e87094b3239.gif  = 6f6d5d3434fc41a1bc38ee9f0d282c1e.gif = dc584df1a8bc9ae2b6daa0f3f7769811.gif


Why do you think S is always 1?
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: The N-field
« Reply #787 on: 10/04/2018 10:15:33 »
1+1= 1
Logged
 

Offline opportunity

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1553
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 48 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • Do not change the URL below
Re: The N-field
« Reply #788 on: 10/04/2018 10:48:19 »
The Box, you're either promoting something or discrediting something. Can you be clearer?
Logged
What is physics without new ideas shed by the positive light of interest of others with new possible solutions to age old problems?
 



guest39538

  • Guest
Re: The N-field
« Reply #789 on: 10/04/2018 10:53:54 »
a4df4c5aaf8f092e03a00f7109e5de74.gif
Quote from: opportunity on 10/04/2018 10:48:19
The Box, you're either promoting something or discrediting something. Can you be clearer?

S = 0.5 + 0.5 ' = 1

S + S = 1 because  a58a0847c1a80ee791c21c58ab7662a6.gif
Logged
 

Offline opportunity

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1553
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 48 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • Do not change the URL below
Re: The N-field
« Reply #790 on: 10/04/2018 11:00:38 »
Is there an actual "physical application" to your ideas or more of the tangled web?

Logged
What is physics without new ideas shed by the positive light of interest of others with new possible solutions to age old problems?
 

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: The N-field
« Reply #791 on: 10/04/2018 11:23:04 »
Quote from: opportunity on 10/04/2018 11:00:38
Is there an actual "physical application" to your ideas or more of the tangled web?


I am looking for ''Gods'' equation because that is the question I am compelled to look for an answer too.  So yes,  there  will be  or should be physical application.
Logged
 

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: The N-field
« Reply #792 on: 10/04/2018 11:28:59 »
Δk0 =  S

S = 0.5 + 0.5' = 1

1 = t

t + t = 1
Logged
 



Offline opportunity

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1553
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 48 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • Do not change the URL below
Re: The N-field
« Reply #793 on: 10/04/2018 11:30:21 »
God's equation?

The one constantly deleted?
Logged
What is physics without new ideas shed by the positive light of interest of others with new possible solutions to age old problems?
 

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: The N-field
« Reply #794 on: 10/04/2018 11:32:33 »
Quote from: opportunity on 10/04/2018 11:30:21
God's equation?

The one constantly deleted?
yes

1 - 1 = 0

added - that may be

1 -  0.5 = 0

Logged
 

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: The N-field
« Reply #795 on: 10/04/2018 11:40:00 »
Quote from: opportunity on 10/04/2018 11:37:39
Ok.

I'm sure God means no harm.

Maybe a fundamental equation "could" invoke the need to repress, as much as the idea of God has been a mystery for so long. Yet if Mary is the mother of God, and Christ is God, we have a long wait for "God". Why would Christ return without Mary?
Anyway I have to go Liverpool and need to go catch a train,  will be back on later. 

God's equation is  the rudiment of existence, not the existence of God.
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    11.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: The N-field
« Reply #796 on: 10/04/2018 19:02:47 »
Quote from: Thebox on 10/04/2018 10:15:33
1+1= 1
No it isn't.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 
The following users thanked this post: Kryptid



guest39538

  • Guest
Re: The N-field
« Reply #797 on: 10/04/2018 23:11:41 »
A rain drop fell into my cup, a second raindrop fell into my cup

1+1 = 1

Only in your dreams are you smarter than me
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31101
  • Activity:
    11.5%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: The N-field
« Reply #798 on: 11/04/2018 21:59:58 »
Quote from: Thebox on 10/04/2018 23:11:41
A rain drop fell into my cup, a second raindrop fell into my cup

1+1 = 1

Only in your dreams are you smarter than me
There are now two drops of rain in your cup.
1+1=2

it seems a very realistic dream.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: The N-field
« Reply #799 on: 12/04/2018 00:34:48 »
No

M + M = M    and S + S = S
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 ... 38 39 [40] 41 42 ... 48   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: misunderstanding basic science  / pigeon chess  / delusional thinking 
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 1.03 seconds with 72 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.