The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Technology
  4. Revolution in power generation
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Revolution in power generation

  • 5 Replies
  • 4060 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline syhprum (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 5198
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 74 times
Revolution in power generation
« on: 30/11/2013 12:18:48 »
An Italian company is starting to ship cold fusion power generators, at last we can get rid of polluting coal fired plants and stop wasting money on futile research into ITER and such like

http://phys.org/news/2013-11-italian-company-portable-cold-fusion.html#ajTabs
Logged
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31102
  • Activity:
    9%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Revolution in power generation
« Reply #1 on: 30/11/2013 13:55:59 »
Other forms of fraud are also available.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 21166
  • Activity:
    62%
  • Thanked: 60 times
  • Life is too short for instant coffee
Re: Revolution in power generation
« Reply #2 on: 30/11/2013 15:49:43 »
Quote
When hydrogen is added, heat and perhaps copper, is produced. According to ECAT, the plant does nothing more than produce heated water and/or steam.

Now that's pretty amazing. The best that nature can manage is helium. Getting nothing but water and copper from a hydrogen fusion reaction is beyond the wildest dreams of alchemy. 

On the other hand, hydrogen + air + catalyst = hot water, as in every other catalytic heater on the planet.

Cold fusion my arse.
Logged
Helping stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 31102
  • Activity:
    9%
  • Thanked: 1291 times
Re: Revolution in power generation
« Reply #3 on: 30/11/2013 16:11:08 »
I think that most of what will be produced is hot air.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 11035
  • Activity:
    9%
  • Thanked: 1486 times
Re: Revolution in power generation
« Reply #4 on: 30/11/2013 21:26:01 »
Quote
perhaps another indication that cold fusion simply cannot be done
Knowing 100 ways that cold fusion doesn't work does not prove that it cannot be done.

In this case, the test will be whether the exhaust gases contain primarily water or helium. (or copper?)
And whether, after sealing off all the ways that oxygen can get into the system, the water and heat production stops.

There is already a proven method of "warm" hydrogen fusion (at < 1000C), with meson-catalysed fusion. However, mesons are too short-lived to be a really useful catalyst, and it requires an excessive amount of energy to produce mesons.
Logged
 



Offline CliffordK

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 6596
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 61 times
  • Site Moderator
Re: Revolution in power generation
« Reply #5 on: 30/11/2013 22:12:59 »
This has been discussed on TNS a few times in the past:
http://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=36771.0
http://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=39244.0
http://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=39451.0

A couple of years later, it is interesting that Rossi is making more progress towards his generators, which is indicative of either significant investment in the scam, or that he has actually found something.

Following the link above, one finds a link to a paper written about it.  Unfortunately, the inner workings of the device is treated like a black box.  And, "recharging" is to be done by company officials.  So, unfortunately there is no detailed independent analysis of the input/output.

If I was to try to fake one of these devices, I'd probably choose to use nuclear decay, although Rossi may have troubles getting his hands on large amounts of specific isotopes without raising suspicion.
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.45 seconds with 40 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.