[Bored chemist]

Might I suggest an alternative strategy?

I think the strategy he needs to ditch is the one where he ignores evidence.
It might also be good if he adopted a plan which involved learning science.

[Yaniv (OP)]

[Bored chemist]

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-46143399

[Yaniv (OP)]

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-46143399

You do realize this experiment has been carried out at a constant temperature ?

[Bored chemist]

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-46143399

You do realize this experiment has been carried out at a constant temperature ?

You do realise  that it shows that W=mg?
You do realise that was the thread's title?

[Yaniv (OP)]

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-46143399

You do realize this experiment has been carried out at a constant temperature ?

You do realise  that it shows that W=mg?
You do realise that was the thread's title?

It shouldn't be too difficult to add a heater and a thermometer to the experiment.

[Bored chemist]

https://www.scienceforums.net/topic/111313-experiment-to-test-wmg/
http://www.sciforums.com/threads/experiment-to-test-w-mg.160128/
http://www.scienceforums.com/topic/30613-experiment-to-test-wmg/?hl=yaniv
http://www.sciencechatforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=39&t=33780&p=330222&hilit=Yaniv#p330222
https://thescienceforum.org/viewtopic.php?f=48&t=2576&p=31673&hilit=Yaniv#p31673
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/pseudoscience/experiment-to-test-w-mg-t55108.html
https://www.debate.org/forums/science/topic/114415/
http://www.thephysicsforum.com/personal-theories-alternative-hypothesis/6950-experiment-test-w-mg.html
https://onlinephilosophyclub.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=15652

Thankyou for clarifying your role as a spammer.

[Kryptid]

Thankyou for clarifying your role as a spammer.

And even after all of those people explained to him why his idea is nonsense, he still doesn't get it. This only solidifies just how unteachable he is.

[Yaniv (OP)]

[Bored chemist]

We already have the results.
They were old news when you started this thread and I posteddthis.

I think the experiment should be carried out using the principle of a calorimeter.

I think you don't know what you are talking about.
Because that experiment is done frequently.
There's a bit of kit specially for doing it
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermogravimetric_analysis

You can rest assured that, if your ideas were right, people would have noticed.
So you are wrong.

And we have posted other evidence since then.

Your inability to understand this is your problem; not ours.

[Kryptid]

This should be considered spam at this point.

[Zer0]

Just a basic simple question...
2 identical cups filled with equal amounts of coffee.

1 is super hot & d other super cold.

Now wich cuppa coffee wud weigh more?

I suppose d heated 1, rite?
Coz in comparison wit d cold 1, d heated 1 has absorbed energy stored inside it in d form of heat, rite???

[Kryptid]

Just a basic simple question...
2 identical cups filled with equal amounts of coffee.

1 is super hot & d other super cold.

Now wich cuppa coffee wud weigh more?

I suppose d heated 1, rite?
Coz in comparison wit d cold 1, d heated 1 has absorbed energy stored inside it in d form of heat, rite???

In this particular case, I'd actually say the hot cup is lighter because evaporation would remove much more mass than the heat would add to it. If the cups were airtight, then yes, the hot cup would be heavier.

[Bored chemist]

Blah...

This should be considered spam at this point.

I disagree; I think it should be thought of as  trolling, rather than spam.

[Kryptid]

I disagree; I think it should be thought of as  trolling, rather than spam.

In either case, I think the topic should be locked. If nothing useful has come out of it in ten pages, it probably never will.

[Yaniv (OP)]

[jeffreyH]

This topic has now descended into trolling and has generated complaints. It has been locked