The Naked Scientists
Toggle navigation
Login
Register
Podcasts
The Naked Scientists
eLife
Naked Genetics
Naked Astronomy
In short
Naked Neuroscience
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
Archive
Video
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Articles
Science News
Features
Interviews
Answers to Science Questions
Get Naked
Donate
Do an Experiment
Science Forum
Ask a Question
About
Meet the team
Our Sponsors
Site Map
Contact us
User menu
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Search
Tags
Recent Topics
Login
Register
Naked Science Forum
Non Life Sciences
Chemistry
Scaling up biofuel tech: chemical versus biological processes
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Scaling up biofuel tech: chemical versus biological processes
3 Replies
6096 Views
0 Tags
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
peppercorn
(OP)
Naked Science Forum King!
1466
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 2 times
Scaling up biofuel tech: chemical versus biological processes
«
on:
27/05/2008 12:34:36 »
Since reading sometime ago about technologies for producing higher alcohol biofuels, such as butanol, I've been interested in whether purely chemical processes would be a better route for large-scale manufacture of next generation fuels.
Ethanol is, as I'm sure has been discussed in many other threads, the political flavour of the month: probably driven on in the main by the US corn lobby, but I digress...
These higher alcohols are chemically far closer to petroleum fuels (by the number of C's & H's) with subsequently comparable volumetric energy density & hydroscopy; unlike ethanol.
The big question is:
Does the increased complexity of two stage anaerobic bacterial processes required for bio-butanol (and others) production render these methods uncompetitive?
-Although I know Dupoint & BP are having a go...
More to the point: how come all the chemical processes (pyrolysis for example) appear to require far more external energy than their biological counterparts?
Can we not emulate nature's methods?
I have an amateurish knowledge of microbiology, but it appears that it is mostly a question of ion-transport (excuse my simplicity!)...
Fuel cells also involve ion-transport; can we not develop similar small-scale structures that are "programmed" to convert sugars, etc into alcohols at low temps/pressures?
Thanks.
Logged
Quasi-critical-thinker
peppercorn
(OP)
Naked Science Forum King!
1466
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 2 times
Scaling up biofuel tech: chemical versus biological processes
«
Reply #1 on:
27/05/2008 12:43:09 »
Additionally, I've come across research on 2,5-Dimethylfuran (DMF) as fuel from biomass:
http://www.news.wisc.edu/13881
This has the perceived advantage of being a purely chemical process, but there seems to be questions over its toxicity.
Also the article claims DMF is 40% more energy dense than ethanol. Where do they get this figure? Is there a table for such things?
Further, is DMF compatable with IC engines?
Logged
Quasi-critical-thinker
chris
Naked Science Forum King!
8061
Activity:
1.5%
Thanked: 306 times
The Naked Scientist
Scaling up biofuel tech: chemical versus biological processes
«
Reply #2 on:
30/05/2008 19:07:05 »
We interviewed Jim Dumesic, who came up with the DMF synthesis pathway, last year. This link contains a transcript of that interview in which he discusses its strengths:
http://www.thenakedscientists.com/HTML/content/interviews/interview/758/
Chris
Logged
I never forget a face, but in your case I'll make an exception - Groucho Marx -
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/
peppercorn
(OP)
Naked Science Forum King!
1466
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 2 times
Scaling up biofuel tech: chemical versus biological processes
«
Reply #3 on:
31/05/2008 12:39:26 »
Thanks Chris for the link to the DMF interview: Very interesting stuff!
Logged
Quasi-critical-thinker
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...