The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Technology
  4. Would a flail-type wood chipper use less power if chipping frozen wood?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Would a flail-type wood chipper use less power if chipping frozen wood?

  • 3 Replies
  • 9792 Views
  • 4 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline peppercorn (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1466
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 2 times
    • View Profile
    • solar
Would a flail-type wood chipper use less power if chipping frozen wood?
« on: 23/07/2009 15:13:28 »

My thinking is that frozen wood is more brittle & the the ice formed would potentially fracture the cell walls and other areas.

Clearly the concussive forces of the flail would start to heat up the wood, but assuming a constant low temp was maintained would there be a significant saving in mechanical energy needed?
Logged
Quasi-critical-thinker
 



Offline LeeE

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3382
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 2 times
    • View Profile
    • Spatial
Would a flail-type wood chipper use less power if chipping frozen wood?
« Reply #1 on: 23/07/2009 17:10:46 »
I think it would depend upon exactly how cold the wood is.  Many trees seem to survive ok after being frozen in winter, so unless it's super-cooled i.e. quite a long way below 0C, I would expect it to require more energy as you're not only having to break up the wood but also the frozen water.  Mind you, and not being a tree scientist, I think it's possible that living trees may contain little free water as it'll be bound up in the sap, which probably has a relatively low freezing point.

Even then though, wooden structures that are periodically frozen don't seem to suffer over the short term from the freezing (they probably will over the long term, but then structural wood will eventually decay over the long term anyway).
Logged
...And its claws are as big as cups, and for some reason it's got a tremendous fear of stamps! And Mrs Doyle was telling me it's got magnets on its tail, so if you're made out of metal it can attach itself to you! And instead of a mouth it's got four arses!
 

Offline peppercorn (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1466
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 2 times
    • View Profile
    • solar
Would a flail-type wood chipper use less power if chipping frozen wood?
« Reply #2 on: 23/07/2009 18:46:37 »

No idea about the freezing point of sap, but I think quite alot of water is in the cell walls (or something!) and sap is only just under the bark isn't it.

I imagine living trees are going to take lower temperatures before ice forms due to the transmission of water up the tree. Cut wood full of ice crystals is definitely more brittle than normal, just trying to get an idea of energy needs.
Logged
Quasi-critical-thinker
 

Offline chris

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 7981
  • Activity:
    0.5%
  • Thanked: 282 times
  • The Naked Scientist
    • View Profile
    • The Naked Scientists
Re: Would a flail-type wood chipper use less power if chipping frozen wood?
« Reply #3 on: 21/04/2018 10:58:02 »
Interesting discussion, which I just stumbled into and it got me thinking...

One of the demos we do on the Naked Scientists stage shows is to immerse flowers and rubber gloves in liquid nitrogen to demonstrate embrittlement. The tissue freezes and also the polymers become unyielding so they fall apart much more readily rather than deform. Cold tissue will therefore definitely chip more readily rather than just deform but may need more energy to do so...

Because, as alluded to above, wood contains water in the xylem tubes, which are in the woody core of a trunk, and also sap in the phloem tubes, which sit beneath the bark. If you freeze wood then the water in both of these places will also freeze; my gut instinct is that this is likely to be harder to smash up than the non-frozen equivalent, so the chipper will consume more energy, not less.
Logged
I never forget a face, but in your case I'll make an exception - Groucho Marx - https://www.thenakedscientists.com/
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: energy  / wood  / freezing  / wood chipping 
 

Similar topics (5)

Is Boron power "Fission" or "Fusion"?

Started by evan_auBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 6
Views: 6524
Last post 08/02/2016 22:47:48
by alancalverd
Can matter and anti-matter annhilation one day power the earth?

Started by spook1456Board Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 1
Views: 9328
Last post 11/04/2011 17:46:33
by JMLCarter
Can water shortage, power shortage, & nuclear waste be simultaneously fixed?

Started by Atomic-SBoard The Environment

Replies: 4
Views: 7150
Last post 11/06/2018 06:16:38
by pradeepkumar
Is 'power fantasy' a cultural thing or a deep-rooted male thing?

Started by ConfusedHermitBoard Physiology & Medicine

Replies: 6
Views: 6331
Last post 05/09/2012 04:41:19
by CliffordK
Is this "Ultra deep hydroelectric/geothermal power plant" the future?

Started by Wolfhart WillimczikBoard Technology

Replies: 2
Views: 3734
Last post 16/10/2016 15:02:27
by Wolfhart Willimczik
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.114 seconds with 42 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.