[yor_on]

NOAA

https://www.scrippsnews.com/science-and-tech/climate-change/noaa-says-it-will-discontinue-its-billion-dollar-disaster-database
=



fingers living their own life.

[yor_on]

Yeah

and  https://scripps.ucsd.edu/news/artificial-climate-controls-might-become-ineffective-because-climate-change

[yor_on]

And that f*ng mantra

'climate change'. Call it global warming and be done with it

[yor_on]

You're so helplessly behind your times that it makes me puke

[yor_on]

Conservative, not so much in what it discuss but in the repercussions from it. It's the 'scientific method' used with 'cutoffs' to make it manageable, ignoring known and unknown effects, which won't cover the synergies coming, or your behaviors.

https://www.egu.eu/news/230/15c-vs-2c-global-warming-new-study-shows-why-half-a-degree-matters/

[yor_on]

This is more like it

https://news.exeter.ac.uk/faculty-of-environment-science-and-economy/world-on-course-to-trigger-multiple-climate-tipping-points-unless-action-accelerates/

[yor_on]

And look at how you behave

Like headless chickens

[yor_on]

If there is a lesson to it, then it is that no matter how good your study is, it won't cover it.

[yor_on]

The one I linked on tippings, 62% chance on a average is also questionable, becoming conservative


2023

https://www.pik-potsdam.de/en/news/latest-news/a-full-picture-of-planetary-resilience-all-boundaries-mapped-out-six-of-nine-crossed

A global fossil ban, think you can do that?


No, you don't

[yor_on]

You're just not able, are you


failed species

[yor_on]

The sickest, or funniest, thing about it is that you have the tools available, for a 'geoengineering'

But you won't take it

One kid per person, back off, slow down. Take care of your basics, not excesses. Share, and get yourself a real democracy.

[yor_on]

And stop warring about it. As you act today you're no more than vindictive children, wanting each others toys.

[yor_on]

And of course, no matter what. A total global fossil ban, done to 2040

[yor_on]

So calling the way you instead prefer, to your own extinction, a result of human behaviors becomes perfectly correct.

[yor_on]

I don't like the tone of it, it seems a little like blame mongering to me, as if it wouldn't exist without migrations which is pretty goddamn stupid to argue. But yes, migrations will grow, and aquifers will fail, with or without them.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/05/20/mass-immigration-makes-britain-thirsty-new-reservoirs-years/

[yor_on]

And here's to your sci fi

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/05/18/robots-are-new-soldiers-in-chinas-tech-race-against-west/

[yor_on]

https://www.nation.com.pk/18-May-2025/pakistan-army-warns-india-blocking-indus-waters-will-trigger-long-term-fallout

[yor_on]

Those water wars, and of course, also religious. For God and Country.

https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3310832/china-says-it-will-speed-pakistan-dam-construction-after-indian-threat-cut-supplies

[yor_on]

Genocides and exodus

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/may/19/benjamin-netanyahu-israel-take-control-gaza-uk-france-canada-threaten-action

[yor_on]

Intelligence just a tool

It's what you use it for that matters.