[yor_on]

"Uncertainty over the future of U.S. universities under President Donald Trump's administration has fuelled a threefold surge in U.S. applications to the Max Planck Society, one of Europe's leading research bodies."

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/max-planck-society-sees-flood-us-job-applicants-amid-trump-swoop-universities-2025-05-30/


A 'win win' situation, but if you think it is for global warming and science you're bicycling in the blue yonder.


Guess again

[yor_on]

Epidemics

"There's more to defending the United States than supplying the military, but the country's budget priorities have been thrown badly out of whack. The Trump administration just canceled a $770 million contract with Moderna (MRNA.O), to develop an avian flu vaccine and the rights to buy the jabs.

For the price of seven F-35 fighter jets, the government is taking a big risk against a formidable foe."


https://www.reuters.com/breakingviews/avian-flu-steamrolls-penny-grabbing-uncle-sam-2025-05-30/

[yor_on]

Well


You do you and I will do me

[yor_on]

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/may/30/donald-trump-geopolitics-could-deepen-planetary-catastrophe-expert-warns

[yor_on]

"Their mission is to salvage the Corbassiere's remaining ice and unlock the precious trove of knowledge it holds about past climates before global heating completely wipes the glacier out."

Global warming, not 'climate change', or 'global heating', the Guardian


Global warming, do you get it?


https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/may/31/glaciers-ice-cores-scientists-drill-climate-change

[yor_on]

Too many idiots and too many obfuscations

[yor_on]

Try to search on " the conveyor belt principle mass productions and resource waste " and see what you will find.

Then " mass productions and global warming"

[yor_on]

Here's one argument

plastics

"the substitute packaging would require 80 percent more cumulative energy demand and result in 130 percent more global warming potentials."

[yor_on]

It's flawed.

[yor_on]

And so is this, but you won't see it coming up in a search engine

https://www.reuters.com/world/china/chinas-may-manufacturing-activity-likely-contracted-second-straight-month-2025-05-30/

[yor_on]

We're burying Earth under a waste mountain those days, and the energy we put into it is a main driver of global warming

[yor_on]

But you don't think about it, and you don't react on it either, except looking for something we don't have


Recycling

[yor_on]

It questions the whole idea of the conveyor belt principle as something worth striving for.

[yor_on]

See how your beliefs twists your studies?

[yor_on]

You can put it under basics versus excesses

[yor_on]

You can also put it under the label of 'developing countries' and 'progress'

[yor_on]

It goes back to our game, and the way our beliefs in what matters blinds us. A game of inequality, waste and profits.

[yor_on]

I don't think we're any better than those people in Shanxi. About the danger of using big words without context, even worse when people change them arbitrarily to suit their egos and agenda. 'Climate change' one example, 'global heating' another


https://www.carbonbrief.org/interview-what-the-people-of-chinas-coal-rich-shanxi-think-about-climate-change/

[yor_on]

Call it global warming and be done with it

[yor_on]

USA

https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/predictions/long_range/fxus07.html