[CPT ArkAngel (OP)]

A must read about Mach's Principle:

http://www.google.ca/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CCkQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springer.com%2Fcda%2Fcontent%2Fdocument%2Fcda_downloaddocument%2F9781461456223-c1.pdf%3FSGWID%3D0-0-45-1364319-p174609485&ei=032vUuykJsqi2wW_vYG4CQ&usg=AFQjCNHsb3eIb-kwR1o4sNxnEnKBBPpBpQ&bvm=bv.57967247,d.aWc

All charges move at the speed of light relative to any frame of reference and elementary particles are not truly elementary, they are made of at least two constituents. Space is flat...

More on that later...

[CPT ArkAngel (OP)]

Here is my 'proof' that there is no event horizon.

1- Forget the GR answer, because gravity is a reciprocal interaction. It must respect Mach's Principle in a theory of Quantum Gravity and that is what Einstein truly wanted for GR, without success.

2- A black hole keeps only the rest mass of particles falling into it.

3- By principle 2, kinetic energy must evade the black hole somehow. Therefore, the maximum event horizon has the Planck Length.

An electron, falling into a black hole, is a superposition or a correlation between an electron rest form and a photon form. The photon form is the kinetic part.


https://www.simonsfoundation.org/quanta/20121221-alice-and-bob-meet-the-wall-of-fire/

http://phys.org/news/2013-12-birth-black-hole-radio-star.html

[CPT ArkAngel (OP)]

No matter, no time and no space.

It is Einstein who first used the term “Mach's Principle”. According to Mach’s Principle, if the universe was made of a single unitary element, this element wouldn’t have any property, no mass, no spin, no charge, no momentum, no energy and no space. The properties of each unitary element are determined in a relation to other unitary elements. Einstein wanted GR to follow this principle and it makes perfect sense.

It is important to understand that Einstein’s views, guiding him to the foundation of General Relativity, may not be solved entirely by the mathematical solution proposed by Einstein: The GR field equations. Minkowski influenced greatly Einstein in his search for a mathematical solution. This is Minkowski’s spacetime which introduced gravitational waves. Something Einstein found but something Einstein doubted about its reality. And there is the black hole solution which he understood to be wrong.

Einstein introduced the concept of spacetime because he didn't have a valid description of matter, including the source of inertia and gravity. Spacetime replaces matter in GR, if you follow Mach. There is spacetime without matter in GR! This is why GR failed to follow Mach’s Principle. He simply couldn’t find a valid solution in agreement with his own understanding.

“Einstein added the cosmological constant term to make static cosmological solutions possible by including a long-range repulsive force. But he also hoped that the inclusion of the cosmological constant term would render his field equations solution less in the absence of matter. Willem deSitter quickly showed that Einstein’s new equations had an expanding, asymptotically empty solution, one with full inertial structure; and a vacuum solution, too. So Einstein’s attempt to include Mach’s principle in this way was deemed a failure.”

http://www.google.ca/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CCkQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.springer.com%2Fcda%2Fcontent%2Fdocument%2Fcda_downloaddocument%2F9781461456223-c1.pdf%3FSGWID%3D0-0-45-1364319-p174609485&ei=032vUuykJsqi2wW_vYG4CQ&usg=AFQjCNHsb3eIb-kwR1o4sNxnEnKBBPpBpQ&bvm=bv.57967247,d.aWc

Spacetime is matter and it is discrete. No matter, no time and no space.

If there are more than one big bang in the universe, there is still a space and time solution without our big bang…

Now you can understand why I say there is no vacuum energy. There is no vacuum energy without matter.


A fifth dimension might still be necessary to explain the electric charge and fields.


Einstein’s unsuccessful investigations?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein%27s_unsuccessful_investigations

Happy new year!!!

[CPT ArkAngel (OP)]

The Big Bang (it is all about synchronization and the physical value of 'pi')


A black ring is a particle made of multiple wavelengths (n*2pi*Lp). Thus, the value of 'pi' must be finite in our physical reality. We have an inertial clock having a time rate of 2pi*Tp.

Then, we have a second clock for the gravitational force. This clock has a time rate of Tp.

These two discrete clocks are always out of sync in elementary particles because each of them is made of one wavelength (note on the relation of stability and synchronization). This is not the case for a black ring! While a black ring keeps growing, it will eventually reach a synchronization point between those two clocks. This is the cause of big bangs…

If you find the real discrete value of 'pi', you find the tuning value needed to explain the set of particles we have and you find the size and the mass of our black ring of origin. Good luck!!!  )

In fact, you need 'pi' and T_p.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pi

[CPT ArkAngel (OP)]

The story of the lonely Mr. Electron desperately seeking love (The endless pursuit of happiness)


Mr Electron is looking for his dreamed particle. He asks to a psychophysicist friend about Miss Positron. She looks so perfect to him.

He learns that the price to pay for a wedding with Miss Positron is the lost of identity of his charges and a split of his massive personality.* He then learns that they could not agree when they talk about their mass. Moreover, after having exchanged half of their mass, they would immediately understand their ultimate incompatibility about it and they would decide to separate at the speed of light.

Later, Mr Electron thinks he has found his perfect half in the name of Mrs Blackring. After their first meeting, they become inseparable. But Mrs Blackring seems never satisfied; she invites others to share their home. Mr Electron cannot leave her because she is simply too attractive.

One day, Mrs Blackring makes a fatal mistake; she has charmed Mr Pi. Once Mr Pi enters their home, everybody understands that his dream can only be fulfill somewhere else. Suddenly, Mrs Blackring doesn’t look attractive anymore; she is not the perfect one. Everybody leaves in a big turmoil, continuing his endless search for happiness, for his perfect half.

Mrs Blackring has become a memory, a story, but she is still a part of their present and a part of their future…

[CPT ArkAngel (OP)]

An interesting article about entanglement and spin propagation:
http://phys.org/news/2014-03-diamonds-friend.html

Note the difference in the spin lifetime when in the middle compared with when at the edge...


This one is related to what I've been thinking for quite a while (black rings and elementary particles tails):
http://phys.org/news/2014-03-kelvin-quantum-tornado.html

Without tails, there would be no interactions... More on that later.


About the B-Mode polarization signal in the CMB, it is due to supermassive black rings jets which were active for billions of years. (remember that it is very faint)

Why the Milky Way signal has to be subtracted from the CMB and not the signals from all other galaxies?

Why the CMB forms a sphere of a radius of over 13 billion ly only a few 100 thousand years after the big bang?

Faster than light expansion of space is nonsense because the expansion is caused by light... There is only circular and circumstantial proofs of proper space expansion!

There is no such thing as an ultimate free lunch! Nothing is free, and we all know that... Unfortunately, entropy is the mother of evolution...

[Tenergy]

I have to wonder if there’s yet another kind of particle that's even more fundamental. newbielink:http://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/Smileys/default/wink.gif [nonactive]
I'm just someone with a hobby and would like to share here some exciting hunches.  Hopefully you can help here (or just shoot holes).

1) A far more powerful and mysterious undetectable ghost particle powers blackholes.
2) ‘Big Collision’ was responsible for the Big Bang which resulted as a ‘blackhole supernova’.

Could tachyons be the ultimate elementary particles of the universe powering blackholes - making them be incredibly stable tachyon stars?

Picture matter and energy falling past the event horizon of a blackhole. Inside the blackhole they ultimately 'break' (or ‘decay’) into tachyons which when ‘activated’ always travel faster than light making it possible for it to escape the blackhole’s gravitational grip. This not only solves the information paradox but also may help explain other bizarre behaviors involving galaxy formation.  Today most galaxies from the early universe still have supermassive blackholes at its core.  So unlike stars these objects tend to be very stable hanging around since the Big Bang days.  A blackhole may in essence be a tachyon star that is possibly the most stable object in the known universe.  Perhaps a relationship similar to E = mc² also exists for tachyons where the equivalence could be expressed something like:
T  ~ kEv_t² = kmc²v_t²

T =Tachyon Energy
V_t = an unknown constant velocity of the associated tachyon within the blackhole’s ‘spacetime’.
k = an unknown constant involved.  (True ‘vacuum’ condition for a tachyon inside of a blackhole is unknown.)
E = energy of the equivalent particle (~photon) within the known universe where tachyon energy is much greater than the equivalent particle’s energy.

When a blackhole really stops feeding it can get so ‘cold’ that tachyons inside go into a ‘condense inactivated’ state where it is ‘frozen’ moving at its slowest speed - the speed of light.  It still may not have a high probability to escape so over time the frozen blackhole slowly shrinks/evaporates (possibly into a normal black dwarf). 

But say new photons enter past the event horizon (or firewall) – the locked up ‘degenerate’ photons can convert into a shower of ‘frozen’ tachyons that are entangled.   And let’s say the blackhole’s increasing feeding behavior from huge amounts of in-falling matter and photons in turn cause the blackhole’s overall temperature and gravity to rise freeing more tachyons to get ‘activated’ to travel than faster than light and have a greater probability of escaping the blackhole thereby avoiding any runaway implosion effects and providing a dynamic equilibrium just like a star for countless eons.  Conversion of higher energy photons results in more tachyon energy either by converting them into more tachyons or by increasing the energy of newly formed tachyons.  A tachyon could however still remain trapped colliding inside the blackhole’s unique spacetime so that it takes on average even millions of years for a tachyon to escape the degenerate blackhole much like how a photon zips/collides around forever inside the core of its star.  (Details on both the ‘frozen’ behavior and spacetime trapping mechanism may still need more thinking here.)

When a blackhole floods the universe with tachyons – after leaving the blackhole’s spacetime and its event horizon the flow of tachyons can then inflate the normal space of the known universe.  (The only spacetime that can curve the tachyon is one that’s inside of a blackhole). 

Normally only matter decays into energy but I wonder if a strange ‘energy decay’ process can also occur? Could photons somehow ‘decay’ into tachyons?  Could that also help explain the conversion of ‘degenerate’ photons into ‘frozen’ tachyons inside the event horizon?
 
On the other hand - could tachyons having no interaction with matter or energy (a tachyon is neither matter nor energy – it’s only another form of the substance having an ‘equivalent’ relationship to energy and matter) somehow while stretching our normal space ‘merge’ together to form the known mediating elementary particles of the known universe (including those fabulous photons)?  If that’s the case then the tachyon would truly be the ultimate elementary particle.  Some may say this is dark energy – but I say it’s distinctly a faster than light no interaction particle (tachyon) with its own constant velocity and a much lighter footprint than a photon thereby preserving the universe’s conservation of momentum. 

Could ‘Big Collision’ have caused the Big Bang and Dark Flow?

Ok now picture my other hunch. I assume there can only be one universe (contains all multiverses if they exist and any unknown entities).  That being the case our ‘known’ universe was once a mighty blackhole.  It was orbiting within a neighborhood of relatively peaceful similar blackholes all moving along a certain direction within a far larger universe filled with boundless dust clouds of free tachyons and unimaginably huge tachyon star clusters of clusters (like trillions of light years across where between tachyon stars are huge voids consisting of mainly dust clouds of ‘frozen’ tachyons.  Only tiny clumps of matter and energy may exist in the universe then.  (If no matter exists then what does a blackhole in this universe feed on?  Certain kinds of tachyons that cannot escape the grip of a truly dynamic tachyon star like those ‘frozen’ tachyons.  Remember a tachyon star’s escape velocity can be much greater than our normal speed of light in our normal universe vacuum.)  Regarding the laws of physics in our known universe – some may only work locally needing expansion to accurately cover events in the larger universe while others may still apply.

Suddenly a huge fast moving rougue blackhole (can a blackhole stretch space and jet across it faster than the speed of light?) slams into our blackhole kingdom colliding with our main blackhole causing the all kinds of blackholes to get entangled and go unstable.  This in turn causes the mightiest blackhole supernova explosion (Whitehole? Is there still a core?) and possibly the occurrence of subsequent GRBs resulting in a shower of many smaller blackholes along with tachyons that have merged into new clumps of matter and energy while stretching normal space.

[CPT ArkAngel (OP)]

Quantum Mechanics demonstrates that everything we measure is quantized.

Quantum entanglement experiments tend to prove that there is a residual correlation between particles spin which is faster than light but somehow non causal within relative space and time. The spin is quantized, meaning it changes in energy steps in local interactions (no faster than light).

In my theory, an elementary particle’s spin is determined by all other particles of the universe as 1/2ⁿ, n being the degree of relation from 1 to N. The sum of all terms is equal to one when N is equal to infinity (opened question). Thus the maximal relation between two particles is ½ or 50 percent. When you measure the spin of a particle, the particles of the detector become entangled with it at a level depending on the strength of the measurement and the noise. The maximal level being 50% between the two originally entangled particles, there is no way to exchange information faster than light because there is 50% of unknown. Even without any noise, you cannot determine the spin value of a single particle in advance of its measurement. In fact, it is Nyquist and Shannon theorem.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nyquist%E2%80%93Shannon_sampling_theorem

So case closed you will say? No, it is not. Still, there is a residual correlation. It is non causal in relative space and time but it is causal in the origin of space and time.

There is no absolute frame of reference in relative space and time but there has to be a quasi-instantaneous relation between every particle. The laws of physics are the same here and far away. Protons and electrons are the same everywhere we look. There is no absolute zero temperature.

There are metalaws (or alphalaws). These laws are prior to the laws of Relativity of space and time and they seem to be static or immutable to us.

So, finally, it is possible that there is a kind of tachyon, but I don’t think it is a particle as we know it because it is beyond Relativity of space and time. I prefer an ultimate clock but you could prefer and ultimate ruler. It seems to me that it is more reasonable to think of emerging space than emerging time.

For tachyons and your black hole explanation, I would say it is very improbable because it is based on a very improbable model of black hole which itself is based on GR which is a macroscopic approximation of reality for the reasons explained earlier in my theory. There is no particle in GR. You need a quantum gravity theory. You must find a way to understand Relativity and Quantum Physics as a single theory…

[CPT ArkAngel (OP)]

Concerning the Nyquist-Shannon theorem in the entanglement context of a single pair of particles, you have only a half  of a sampling per wavelength. At this sampling rate, the signal is supressed entirely.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nyquist_frequency

More explanations later... But it works for all sampling rates of 1/2ⁿ...

[CPT ArkAngel (OP)]

The reality of photons

Photons are real objects. Any photon is real for every other particle of the Universe. Therefore, a photon must have a minimal relative energy which constitutes a fundamental physical layer. We already have many hints that there is a maximal value, probably around the Planck length.

The motion of a particle, relative to another, has a photonic nature. The particle is a special correlation of a rest frame with a motion frame. The motion frame is a real photon. Thus, there is a minimal relative motion and it is impossible to attain a temperature of absolute zero (no motion state).


Einstein’s Ether is not in space but in time

After that the Special Theory and the General Theory of Relativity have been recognized, physicists got rid of ether and other absolutisms. Newton’s Theory seemed dead. Everything must be relative, most scientists thought.

But as Einstein said, everything cannot be relative; there must be some kind of reality, something absolute, at least in a sense. Something must replace ether and represent a palpable layer of reality. We should get rid of absolute relativity then…

In principle, the Earth’s rotation could be stopped for an infinitely small amount of time. The Earth is an aggregate of elementary particles and its rotation is defined relatively to all particles of the Universe. The no rotation of the Earth is a boundary for Relativity, in the same way absolute zero temperature is.

The no rotation is an absolute limit replacing Ether. It is not in space but it is in time. There is a privileged frame in time. A reference in space is only an emergent one. The circular gravitational lightwave (or matterwave) of an elementary particle represents a non rotating frame: the electric charge rotates at the speed of light, not the circle…

Ultimately, the absolute reference is in time, not in space… Physicists of a distant future will one day try to crack what is hidden during the Planck interval…

Notes:
This might sounds trivial for you and you might think it doesn’t add anything to my theory. But the fact is, even though it is implied, there is no description of the source or the boundary of a no rotation frame in the Theory of General Relativity.

It is interesting to note that the only solution for a stationary orbit around a single non rotating object is a straight line away to infinity…

Article on Einstein’s ether:
http://www.google.ca/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=4&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CDAQFjAD&url=http%3A%2F%2Fredshift.vif.com%2FJournalFiles%2FV08NO3PDF%2FV08N3GRF.PDF&ei=NXP1VOX5HsTksATisoGIDQ&usg=AFQjCNGdFTm19LgnJMFtPmTjTlq_kdfCnA

[jccc]

there is no photon. light is gravitational wave produced by exited atoms. http://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=26362.275

a matter/mass/charge has force/gravitational field, if the matter moves, the field follows. if the matter vibrates, the field follows.

if the sun has a big ejection/quake, we should be able to detect it 500 seconds later. we might even have a earthquake.

atoms, each has mass, when atoms exited, their fields exited, within that field, you feel light.

[CPT ArkAngel (OP)]

Just a precision: The minimal relative energy of a photon may possibly be dynamical and not fixed, even though it still represents a real physical boundary.

Olbers’ paradox debunked:
“The paradox is that a static, infinitely old universe with an infinite number of stars distributed in an infinitely large space would be bright rather than dark.”

It is simply not true. The brightness depends on the average density of radiation (temperature). The paradox disappears if you understand the implications of infinite space and discrete photons. If a star is far enough, you may have to wait a very long time before one of its photons hit one of your retinas.

I don’t think we will ever know if the Universe is finite or not, but I guess it is… According to my theory, the universe may be finite or not. The universe is made of discrete particles of energy, but the quantity of these particles is still undefined.

[Spring Theory]

You're on the right track about photons being the fundamental "particle" but you assumption that the speed of light is constant should be reconsidered.

If we are made up of photons then if their speed changes, we could not notice it or measure it since our own photons orbitals would change in cycle time also.

This is what appears to be time dilation.  Einstein just had it backwards. Time is constant. The speed of light is variable.

[CPT ArkAngel (OP)]

Time dilation is demonstrated in longer half lives of particles in accelerator and cosmic rays. What about GPS and other experiments? It is in agreement with Einstein's theories.

Time rate is constant locally but relative for different localities. The speed of light is only constant locally because it is defined by the speed of time. The flow of time depends on relative speed and relative gravity potentials.

In my theory, I defined a locality as being a single elementary particle. There is no structure of space. Space is the result of all interactions between particles. It is misleading to talk about specific coordinates in vacuum like an arbitrary point in space between you and the screen you are looking at right now, unless you put yourself in relation to a particle of air... There is no Euclidean or Newtonian space. The only absolute and common space is the Planck Length.

I have an unpublished article about it that I wrote a few months ago. I will transcribe it on the forum soon.
(I found the ISW effect in my theory but from a simple and different interpretation than the main one: there is no disconnection possible between particles)


 

[PmbPhy]

]
This is what appears to be time dilation.  Einstein just had it backwards. Time is constant. The speed of light is variable.

That's quite incorrect. Where's your proof or an argument to justify your assertion?

[Spring Theory]

Time dilation is demonstrated in longer half lives of particles in accelerator and cosmic rays. What about GPS and other experiments? It is in agreement with Einstein's theories.

Time rate is constant locally but relative for different localities. The speed of light is only constant locally because it is defined by the speed of time. The flow of time depends on relative speed and relative gravity potentials.

I am not arguing with the time dilation effect - I agree it exists, but simply disagree with the mechanism behind it. Consider that instead of time slowing down in a gravity well, the speed of photons is reduced.  Since particles are made of photons, the particles that compose our bodies and our time measuring devices will also slow down, creating time dilation.

The time dilation effect is equivalent from either perspective. The major difference is that Spring Theory explains the nature of space time rather than making an assumption that "time slows down".

[Even2]

Hi my model of the simple universe posits that the electron or rather the electro-positron is the only basic particle.
All particles including the photon which in this case would be an expanded electro-positron are formed from this one particle.
Mass in this model is a product of both positive and negative static electric fields.
Compressing these fields increases mass, and expanding these fields decreases mass.
So a photon would be an expanded electro-positron.And when the photon is compressed in a collision it gains mass and becomes either a positive-electron or a electro-positron.

even2

[CPT ArkAngel (OP)]

An idea about Dark Matter

I won't talk for quite a while about a cosmological model including the ISW effect.

I want to describe the gravitational tail of particles, which is exactly the gravitational correction I have voluntarily neglected in my calculation of the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron. With the recent discovery of gravitational waves, I found answers I desperately needed... And it is quite a revelation for me. It is in agreement much more than what I expected. It fills the voids... literally...

Just a last and quick thinking about the possibility of a universe made of multiple big bangs, each having a different finite value of PI fixed at a big bang... PI is related to the longitudinal mode (or dimension) which is inertia and it determines its wavelength. While Gravity is the transversal mode and has a wavelength in multiples of the Planck time without the direct relation to PI. Electric charges necessitate connections between both the longitudinal mode and the transversal mode to explain the two polarities. These connections were fixed by the value of PI at the big bang. But if there are other big bangs with different values of PI, what will happened? Invisible Matter, only perceived by its gravitational interactions.

It is a bit a spooky idea and a very long stretch, I must admit...

You might think there is a flaw in how matter may interact gravitationally with Dark Matter and produces its motion. You must know that Dark Matter would have charges of its own, where the Dark longitudinal mode is connected with gravity (the transversal common mode).

The magnetic field is a mixture of both dimensions...

[CPT ArkAngel (OP)]

No sterile or Majorana neutrino

Asymmetry is the cause of the big bang expansion. It is the cause of the multiplicity of the particles. If you considered that the perfect symmetry is the number 1 and the maximum entropy is zero (0), then no two particles can be perfectly symmetrical. The interactions between particles are the leftovers of earlier forms of particles; which, on average, had a lower entropy than their products. At the Big Bang, the entropy was at its lowest point but it was not 1 (no entropy and perfect symmetry). You need a string or a tail between particles to make them interact. This string is the asymmetrical result. Together, the particles symmetry is nearer the value of one. From this, it is unlikely to have a product which is of much greater symmetry than its genitors.

My model of elementary massive particles is determined to be two concentric circular waves because it is asymmetrical and absolutely necessary to explain spacetime and interactions between particles...

You should read: "The Singular Universe and the Reality of Time" by Roberto Mangabeira Unger and Lee Smolin
Lee Smolin's part is essential because he provides another perspective and he identifies general principles I follow without defining them. These are essential general principles to achieve a unifying theory. I agree with all of them, except maybe one.

[CPT ArkAngel (OP)]

Copenhagen vs Everett, Teleportation, and ER=EPR
By Leonard Susskind

https://arxiv.org/abs/1604.02589

I’ve learned a lot from Susskind. The basic concepts of entanglement and the holographic principle are those that come to my mind. I disagree on the fringes but it is normal as the fringes are ‘where people disagree’ by definition… You can find Susskind courses on entanglement on the WEB.

It seems I’m entangled with Susskind… But how?

When you discuss with someone, you become entangled with this person. The information is physically exchanged by the dynamical process of entanglement through time. This information is filtered by the brains and then stored in memory. It is a reciprocal process but time gives it a direction, at least for purely local interactions (further considerations are necessary to establish the order of the causality chain).

When you read someone writings, you become entangled with him or her. Your brains are entangled. By particles associations, you could in principle, have access to all contents, though the information is limited by the fact that the other person is entangled with his environment and that time has elapsed since the actual writing process. But the brain, obviously, has a capacity to maintain a high degree of entanglement in a selective memory using multiple particles and keeping the order. Many scientific studies show this but without explanation: This looks more like a magic trick.

Can we acquire information faster than the speed of light? The memory could be like a battery: you have to get physically entangled with someone to re-establish the link in analogy to the charge of a battery. You lose gradually your connections to a person as you and the other become entangled with other things and other people. There might be a preferential network of wormholes and/or space-time connections between all the brains on Earth due to their special abilities (your pets included). Anyway, FTL or not, information is exchanged by entanglement and the more macroscopic the information ensemble is, the greater is the multitude of entangled particles necessary to conceptualize it and to store it in memory. The level of entanglement can explain why our memory is not perfect but still very efficient...

Sometimes, it may be necessary to disconnect yourself from parts of your environment and connect to some other people to be enlightened (thinking out of the box). Thus, differences are necessary. Respect and honesty are the keys to maximize the validity of the information exchanged… I hope someday, not too far, we will all understand that it is a real physical process and no one can escape it! No one should escape it! If you don’t respect other people, don’t expect respect from others.

Fear is not respect!

The concept of success in our society is mostly related to our profound desire for freedom and the need to have an example to follow, without understanding the actual history and further consequences. In our society, money is power, power represent “freedom”.  Truth is only important if someone realizes he can make a buck out of it… We all know that truth should be more important than money because truth is the only way to fulfill one’s dreams… It is the only way to minimize uncertainty while maximizing freedom by following the best paths accordingly. This is a dynamical process that must be continuously maintained.

Just open your eyes and stop giving power to those who don’t deserve it so we can all connect our heart to our brain and continue to evolve… So it becomes true to say that truth is more important than money… Money is just paper and its value is in your head… It has more a tendency to maximize uncertainty than the other way around…

The word “honesty” and all its derivatives seem to be vanishing from many people’s vocabulary these days, often from powerful people’s vocabulary. In fact, if you are honest and speak openly of your desire for honest and opened relations within a business, political or law context, you will probably face expulsion and you will be exposed to ridicule. Those people don’t seem to understand that they are a part of the play. The concept of constant evolution is absent from their narrow mind, though from a monkey and beyond, we have evolved…

PS.: I still think that space is the result of the causality chain and that there is a preferred direction to time, simply because it is our daily experience.