The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. How does coal compare to fission for radioactive waste?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

How does coal compare to fission for radioactive waste?

  • 8 Replies
  • 5786 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

This topic contains a post which is marked as Best Answer. Press here if you would like to see it.

system

  • Guest
How does coal compare to fission for radioactive waste?
« on: 13/04/2011 12:30:02 »
How does release of radioactive potassium from coal burners compare to fission reactors?
Asked by Paradox Olbers, Second Life

                                       
Go to the show page.
                                       
[chapter podcast=3078 track=11.04.10/Naked_Scientists_Show_11.04.10_8321.mp3]  or Listen to the Answer[/chapter] or [download as MP3]
« Last Edit: 13/04/2011 12:30:02 by _system »
Logged
 



Offline syhprum

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 5198
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 74 times
How does coal compare to fission for radioactive waste?
« Reply #1 on: 13/04/2011 16:06:55 »
Take a look here this article gives a summary of the matter.


http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=coal-ash-is-more-radioactive-than-nuclear-waste
Logged
 

Offline chris

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 8061
  • Activity:
    1%
  • Thanked: 306 times
  • The Naked Scientist
    • The Naked Scientists
How does coal compare to fission for radioactive waste?
« Reply #2 on: 13/04/2011 18:15:45 »
Mmm - I'm not sure I like that articles very much and, judging by the accompanying comments, neither did the readership; it's ambiguous and a bit inflammatory. I'd prefer a sounder source than that.

Chris
Logged
I never forget a face, but in your case I'll make an exception - Groucho Marx - https://www.thenakedscientists.com/
 

Marked as best answer by on 25/11/2017 00:52:32

Offline JMLCarter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 144
  • Activity:
    0%
How does coal compare to fission for radioactive waste?
« Reply #3 on: 13/04/2011 20:58:43 »
Did you read the editor's note?

"As a general clarification, ounce for ounce, coal ash released from a power plant delivers more radiation than nuclear waste shielded via water or dry cask storage."

So, it's a saying coal ash is more radioactive than shielded nuclear waste.

...from this we conclude that the shielding works. Not that coal ash is dangerous. Although it may be. Or not.
Logged
 

Offline Geezer

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 8314
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 8 times
  • "Vive la résistance!"
How does coal compare to fission for radioactive waste?
« Reply #4 on: 13/04/2011 22:20:11 »
I see no reason to doubt the numbers.

Also, in general, nuclear waste is not incorporated into building materials. Fly ash from coal plants is.

Mind you, I'm not sure it's any worse to live in a house that's made from the stuff than living in a house in "The Granite City" (Aberdeen, Scotland).
Logged
There ain'ta no sanity clause, and there ain'ta no centrifugal force æther.
 



Offline chris

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 8061
  • Activity:
    1%
  • Thanked: 306 times
  • The Naked Scientist
    • The Naked Scientists
How does coal compare to fission for radioactive waste?
« Reply #5 on: 14/04/2011 10:12:50 »
Absolutely - Edinburgh, parts of Devon and Cornwall and so on, are all on granite and radioactive radon from decay products in the rock can accumulate in homes, posing, I would argue, a far more significant threat.

Chris
Logged
I never forget a face, but in your case I'll make an exception - Groucho Marx - https://www.thenakedscientists.com/
 

Offline Geezer

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 8314
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 8 times
  • "Vive la résistance!"
How does coal compare to fission for radioactive waste?
« Reply #6 on: 14/04/2011 18:50:41 »
Quote from: chris on 14/04/2011 10:12:50
Absolutely - Edinburgh, parts of Devon and Cornwall and so on, are all on granite and radioactive radon from decay products in the rock can accumulate in homes, posing, I would argue, a far more significant threat.

Chris

The situation in Aberdeen is exacerbated by the fact that so many of the buildings are actually made of granite (it seemed like a good idea at the time) so it's coming at you from all sides, as it were  [:D]
Logged
There ain'ta no sanity clause, and there ain'ta no centrifugal force æther.
 

Offline imatfaal

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2782
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • rouge moderator
How does coal compare to fission for radioactive waste?
« Reply #7 on: 15/04/2011 19:12:37 »
Quote from: Geezer on 14/04/2011 18:50:41
Quote from: chris on 14/04/2011 10:12:50
Absolutely - Edinburgh, parts of Devon and Cornwall and so on, are all on granite and radioactive radon from decay products in the rock can accumulate in homes, posing, I would argue, a far more significant threat.

Chris

The situation in Aberdeen is exacerbated by the fact that so many of the buildings are actually made of granite (it seemed like a good idea at the time) so it's coming at you from all sides, as it were  [:D]

I've met people from Aberdeen - and frankly from what I have seen they are impervious to the cold, to alcohol, and to the blandishments of wee sassenachs - and I am quite prepared to believe that alpha, beta and gamma radiation bounces off them and rushes off to find a more amenable body with which to interact.
Logged
There’s no sense in being precise when you don’t even know what you’re talking about.  John Von Neumann

At the surface, we may appear as intellects, helpful people, friendly staff or protectors of the interwebs. Deep down inside, we're all trolls. CaptainPanic @ sf.n
 

Offline Geezer

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 8314
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 8 times
  • "Vive la résistance!"
How does coal compare to fission for radioactive waste?
« Reply #8 on: 15/04/2011 19:22:32 »
Quote from: imatfaal on 15/04/2011 19:12:37

I've met people from Aberdeen - and frankly from what I have seen they are impervious to the cold, to alcohol, and to the blandishments of wee sassenachs - and I am quite prepared to believe that alpha, beta and gamma radiation bounces off them and rushes off to find a more amenable body with which to interact.
 

Apparently, they can also become invisible. The expression "The streets were deserted. It was like Aberdeen on a flag day" is clear evidence of this phenomenon.
« Last Edit: 16/04/2011 01:55:07 by Geezer »
Logged
There ain'ta no sanity clause, and there ain'ta no centrifugal force æther.
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 1.552 seconds with 47 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.