0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Clark's "Zapper" is a low-voltage device that supposedly kills parasites, bacteria, and viruses with electrical energy, but does not harm human tissue. Its use is based on Clark's notion that all living things broadcast a characteristic range of radio frequencies and that the device can issue counter-frequencies that kill unwanted organisms. Neither device has any genuine diagnostic or therapeutic value.
[MOD Note: Most of your links are broken. Did you copy/paste from elsewhere? Generally original content is preferred on this site. If it is not your writing, then it should be identified as such.]A large number of the Malaria cases are self limiting, and adults that have had multiple previous infections may acquire some immunity. There may also be some crossover of naturally acquired immunity between different strains. Any test should have a blinded randomized controlled clinical trial. In this case, both groups probably should be treated with the "cage", but only one group would have it turned on. The last link you included seemed to indicate the trial with only an experimental group, and no control group.As with many things, magnetic field intensity drops off with the square of the distance. The notes indicate a weak magnetic field, but the apparatus depicted appears like it would deliver a very weak field.Is there a frequency that is used? 50/60 HZ, or something different?One could get a much stronger magnetic field with an MRI machine, but perhaps the scan frequency would have to be adjusted, and it is not focused on the whole body at once.
"It is thought that the parasite which ingests heme/iron has it "bowels" ruptured when the changing magnetic field causes the stored/ingested heme crystals to be shaken about."By whom is that thought, and do they know that heme isn't magnetic?
full details of the method in depth are here:-https://www.google.nl/patents/US20120130149
... After 24 hour exposure to an alternating magnetic field of 15 Gauss (Gs) ...
"The magnetic susceptibility of hemozoin varies depending on the nature of the solution in which it is found; but, the resulting magnetic moment is generally within 1 to 5 Bohr magneton, "Roughly the same as hemoglobin in blood.I'm still not convinced
Quote from: profound on 11/05/2014 11:46:05full details of the method in depth are here:-https://www.google.nl/patents/US20120130149 NB: just because a patent exists doesn't mean the apparatus actually works,e.g. https://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/museum/patents.htmQuote from: profound on 11/05/2014 12:13:21... After 24 hour exposure to an alternating magnetic field of 15 Gauss (Gs) ... An MRI machine has a field strength over a million times that , any cases of malaria being cured by being in an MRI ? [ the field in an MRI is constant, rather than alternating, but from the parasite's perspective the field will effectively be alternating as they change their orientation whilst travelling in the bloodstream ]
Did you even read the patent?
Quote from: profound on 12/05/2014 08:09:10Did you even read the patent?I read some of it , but patent applications are not proof of efficacy. A double-blind study using infected people could provide proof that the device works.Which peer-reviewed journal are the results of the human-trial published in ?[ the blog you refer to is written by a follower of the fraudulent "Dr" Hulda Clark who's "zapper" scam I mentioned above , (reply#4) ].http://www.quackwatch.com/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/Cancer/clark.htmlhttp://www.quackwatch.com/11Ind/bolen.htmlhttp://www.quackwatch.com/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/Cancer/clarkaff/huffman.htmlhttp://www.quackwatch.com/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/Cancer/clarkaff/pappas.htmlhttp://www.quackwatch.com/02ConsumerProtection/FTCActions/clarkcomplaint.html
what has that got to with it?
The Bill & Melinda Gates foundation have donated $millions to curing malaria (because noone would cure malaria for a profit).If degaussing worked on malaria, I am sure they would investigate it.Why would they investigate it?
Quote from: profound on 12/05/2014 16:47:29what has that got to with it?You can start with a hypothesis. Perhaps cite some anecdotes. But, then one needs to progress with the double blind study, hopefully designed in a way that patients would not be harmed by the experimental protocol. As I mentioned earlier, it would be easy enough to select a large number of patients. All would be put in the cage, some receiving the "treatment", others just sitting in the cage without treatment, perhaps hearing a soft buzzer to indicate that the machine is "working". All patients should also receive the "standard care", at least during the early trials as it would be unethical to withhold potentially life saving medications. Double blinding would be that the people administrating the test would be unaware of the actual configuration.The notes I see indicate that the mortality rate for malaria has plummeted since the 1940's. It is lowest for young adults, and they would be a good initial target group for the study. 99.9% of the patients should recover with the standard care. The study would have to be huge to pick out some of the 0.1% mortality to statistical significance, but other measurements such as the rapidity of clearing from the blood would be useful. There is widespread Chloroquine resistance, and drugs alone may not be the only answer.
[ the field in an MRI is constant, rather than alternating, but from the parasite's perspective the field will effectively be alternating as they change their orientation whilst travelling in the bloodstream ]
Quote from: RD on 11/05/2014 19:21:00[ the field in an MRI is constant, rather than alternating, but from the parasite's perspective the field will effectively be alternating as they change their orientation whilst travelling in the bloodstream ]We also use three orthogonal oscillating magnetic fields, which should rip apart or boil anything with a significant susceptibility and a weak cell wall. Worth a try.
Quote from: alancalverd on 16/05/2014 18:20:03Quote from: RD on 11/05/2014 19:21:00[ the field in an MRI is constant, rather than alternating, but from the parasite's perspective the field will effectively be alternating as they change their orientation whilst travelling in the bloodstream ]We also use three orthogonal oscillating magnetic fields, which should rip apart or boil anything with a significant susceptibility and a weak cell wall. Worth a try.Why would VERY poor malaria patients go into a very expensive ,very specialized million $ MRI machine?.In any case the field required is quite weak compared to a MRI field...the parasite are not all traveling and there is no way they can travel fast enough in the body to simulate a 5 to 15 hertz oscillating magnetic field.