The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. Does spin plus aether equal matter?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4   Go Down

Does spin plus aether equal matter?

  • 60 Replies
  • 20462 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Atkhenaken (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 156
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 5 times
Re: Does spin plus aether equal matter?
« Reply #40 on: 06/09/2016 15:52:39 »
Quote from: JoeBrown on 06/09/2016 14:14:01
I'm with you Atkhenaken

Been hiding from this forum while delving into my own postulations.  I've contrived a similar postulation to yours.  But I think your off by two spin.  There's perpendicular forces ie. electro-magnetism.

That suggests theres 4 spin.  up/down - left/right...  Which makes your universe a little less simple (not much tho).

Left and right spin is all that there can be. You can rotate the left or right spin in any direction which includes up and down. Thus, both up and down are already taken into consideration as part of my theory. Rotation is only possible when considering neutrons. Space doesn't have any rotation which differentiates itself from matter. Thus, what we call "matter" are ethons in rotation around a neutron. Dimensionality is the complicated part. Fractal dimensions differentiate atoms from galaxies. Time and dimensional differences make it impossible to see inside an atom.

Quote
I understand your desire to use the term aether.  I don't quite see it as an aether.  Space the final frontier, is difficult to explain, because we simply cannot see it.  Doesn't mean it's "nothing", but if you cannot examine a thing, it makes it hard to describe...

I've been working on describing all of the forces as I understand them, to myself with a similar thesis.  You're ethon I refer to as photon in my thoughts, w/out the speed of light.

Think of the universe as a kind of Photoshop which has layers which are invisible but can influence other layers depending on the programming. The speed and nature of light are two important keys to understanding the universe. Light being two dimensional can only travel as a spin/wave through a medium. Thus, light has spin torque which gives it its intensity. Note - The sun burns your skin slowly. How? Spin torque! Get a long round and narrow stick and spin it fast on your skin and your skin will burn. Same thing!

Quote
I don't agree with your neutron - blackhole hypothesis.  I've haven't worked out the math, but I think electrons have electric polar spin alignment and protons have perpendicular (magnetic) polar spin alingment. I think neutrons have both combined in harmony.

Recent research has found that galactic shapes are very similar to atomic shapes. Most scientists will say that galaxies don't resemble atoms but they don't take into consideration the dimensional time shift.

Further research see - Robert Distinti's website.
Logged
 



guest39538

  • Guest
Re: Does spin plus aether equal matter?
« Reply #41 on: 06/09/2016 16:52:58 »
Quote from: Atkhenaken on 06/09/2016 15:52:39

The sun burns your skin slowly. How? Spin torque!

The Sun does not burn your skin, your skins reaction to the radiation is the burning you feel. 
Logged
 

Offline Atkhenaken (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 156
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 5 times
Re: Does spin plus aether equal matter?
« Reply #42 on: 07/09/2016 02:46:29 »
Quote from: Thebox on 06/09/2016 16:52:58
Quote from: Atkhenaken on 06/09/2016 15:52:39

The sun burns your skin slowly. How? Spin torque!

The Sun does not burn your skin, your skins reaction to the radiation is the burning you feel.

Radiation equals spin torque. Thanks for your confirmation!
Logged
 

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: Does spin plus aether equal matter?
« Reply #43 on: 08/09/2016 11:04:10 »
Quote from: Atkhenaken on 07/09/2016 02:46:29
Quote from: Thebox on 06/09/2016 16:52:58
Quote from: Atkhenaken on 06/09/2016 15:52:39

The sun burns your skin slowly. How? Spin torque!

The Sun does not burn your skin, your skins reaction to the radiation is the burning you feel.

Radiation equals spin torque. Thanks for your confirmation!


There is no confirmation in that post, please do not misinterpret my posts and put in your own words that  you want to hear.


Radiation = pressure

You skin becomes Saturated in radiation, the greater the radiation intensity the greater the ''heat'' you feel. The atoms/molecules/chemicals of you interact with the radiation and reacting in some way. I still do not see why you are applying spin although ''light'' spins according to theory, (I have no idea how true that is).

The greater the pressure and intensity of ''light'' the denser the ''layers'' of Photons are at the surface point of permeability of the surface, the electromagnetic field and resonating ''signal'' from the surface structure obstructing and creating a ''bottleneck/congestion of ''light''.








Logged
 

Offline Atkhenaken (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 156
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 5 times
Re: Does spin plus aether equal matter?
« Reply #44 on: 11/09/2016 15:55:52 »
Quote from: Thebox on 04/09/2016 04:23:50
Quote from: Atkhenaken on 30/08/2016 15:26:10
The universe is a simple place which can be explained in a very simple manner using spin as the basic unit of activity which the universe is based.

Ok, I have thought about this myself in the past, spin is not the primary although in principle spin/rotation is a ''huge'' part of the activity of the Universe.
However spin/rotation is surely a process of acting force(s)?

Spin is the primary source of all energy.
Logged
 



guest39538

  • Guest
Re: Does spin plus aether equal matter?
« Reply #45 on: 11/09/2016 15:59:25 »
Quote from: Atkhenaken on 11/09/2016 15:55:52
Quote from: Thebox on 04/09/2016 04:23:50
Quote from: Atkhenaken on 30/08/2016 15:26:10
The universe is a simple place which can be explained in a very simple manner using spin as the basic unit of activity which the universe is based.

Ok, I have thought about this myself in the past, spin is not the primary although in principle spin/rotation is a ''huge'' part of the activity of the Universe.
However spin/rotation is surely a process of acting force(s)?

Spin is the primary source of all energy.

No, compression and ''storage'' ability is the rudiment of E. Spin has nothing to do with it.


Logged
 

Offline Atkhenaken (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 156
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 5 times
Re: Does spin plus aether equal matter?
« Reply #46 on: 12/09/2016 06:16:19 »
Quote from: Thebox on 11/09/2016 15:59:25


No, compression and ''storage'' ability is the rudiment of E. Spin has nothing to do with it.

How is energy stored??????????

What is the storage mechanism????????
Logged
 

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: Does spin plus aether equal matter?
« Reply #47 on: 12/09/2016 08:06:26 »
Quote from: Atkhenaken on 12/09/2016 06:16:19
Quote from: Thebox on 11/09/2016 15:59:25


No, compression and ''storage'' ability is the rudiment of E. Spin has nothing to do with it.

How is energy stored??????????

What is the storage mechanism????????


Similar to magnetic storage the same has a hard drive works.   A magnetic field can stop some hf getting in, but it also captures some light and stops it escaping.
The storage mechanism is the field, and all matter generates a field , contains a field. The Hf within a field, is pushed to the center of the field where it then is forced to rotate by a sort of mini magnus effect.

Entropy is just a technical term for capacitance.

The K max of S of an isolated ''power cell''= hf/s/s/s/s/s/s/s/s/s/s/s/s/s..........................................................................



 

Logged
 

Offline Atkhenaken (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 156
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 5 times
Re: Does spin plus aether equal matter?
« Reply #48 on: 12/09/2016 09:44:37 »
Quote from: Thebox on 12/09/2016 08:06:26
Quote from: Atkhenaken on 12/09/2016 06:16:19
Quote from: Thebox on 11/09/2016 15:59:25


No, compression and ''storage'' ability is the rudiment of E. Spin has nothing to do with it.

How is energy stored??????????

What is the storage mechanism????????


Similar to magnetic storage the same has a hard drive works.   A magnetic field can stop some hf getting in, but it also captures some light and stops it escaping.
The storage mechanism is the field, and all matter generates a field , contains a field. The Hf within a field, is pushed to the center of the field where it then is forced to rotate by a sort of mini magnus effect.

Entropy is just a technical term for capacitance.

The K max of S of an isolated ''power cell''= hf/s/s/s/s/s/s/s/s/s/s/s/s/s..........................................................................


"pushed to the centre where it is forced to rotate" Thus, we are in total agreement that spin is the ultimate action of the universe. Thanks for confirming my hypothesis.
Logged
 



guest39538

  • Guest
Re: Does spin plus aether equal matter?
« Reply #49 on: 12/09/2016 15:15:16 »
Quote from: Atkhenaken on 12/09/2016 09:44:37
Quote from: Thebox on 12/09/2016 08:06:26
Quote from: Atkhenaken on 12/09/2016 06:16:19
Quote from: Thebox on 11/09/2016 15:59:25


No, compression and ''storage'' ability is the rudiment of E. Spin has nothing to do with it.

How is energy stored??????????

What is the storage mechanism????????


Similar to magnetic storage the same has a hard drive works.   A magnetic field can stop some hf getting in, but it also captures some light and stops it escaping.
The storage mechanism is the field, and all matter generates a field , contains a field. The Hf within a field, is pushed to the center of the field where it then is forced to rotate by a sort of mini magnus effect.

Entropy is just a technical term for capacitance.

The K max of S of an isolated ''power cell''= hf/s/s/s/s/s/s/s/s/s/s/s/s/s..........................................................................


"pushed to the centre where it is forced to rotate" Thus, we are in total agreement that spin is the ultimate action of the universe. Thanks for confirming my hypothesis.

You keep doing that, that does not confirm spin is the ultimate action of the Universe although spin is a key thing of the Universe , it is not the ultimate. Other actions occur before spin.
Logged
 

Offline Atkhenaken (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 156
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 5 times
Re: Does spin plus aether equal matter?
« Reply #50 on: 12/09/2016 15:32:14 »
Quote from: Thebox on 12/09/2016 15:15:16

"pushed to the centre where it is forced to rotate" Thus, we are in total agreement that spin is the ultimate action of the universe. Thanks for confirming my hypothesis.
Quote
You keep doing that, that does not confirm spin is the ultimate action of the Universe although spin is a key thing of the Universe , it is not the ultimate. Other actions occur before spin.

Spin is the logical end game of the universe. There is no other way for the universe to save energy over a long period of time. Think of the billions of years that atoms spend not doing anything and then suddenly releasing energy. To do this they must have an internal spin mechanism for storing large amounts of energy. Thus, they must spin at the speed of light in order to store enough energy to power the universe. Thus, spin is a logical certainty because there are no other logical explanations which fit all the required criteria. Spin energy is the missing link that all the great scientists of the past have overlooked. Spin energy explains, gravity, light, mass, space and everything else in a logical and coherent order. These three spin states create a simple order and interlocking characteristics which are not present using the current theories.
Logged
 
The following users thanked this post: Alex Dullius Siqueira

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: Does spin plus aether equal matter?
« Reply #51 on: 12/09/2016 15:46:23 »
Quote from: Atkhenaken on 12/09/2016 15:32:14
Quote from: Thebox on 12/09/2016 15:15:16

"pushed to the centre where it is forced to rotate" Thus, we are in total agreement that spin is the ultimate action of the universe. Thanks for confirming my hypothesis.
Quote
You keep doing that, that does not confirm spin is the ultimate action of the Universe although spin is a key thing of the Universe , it is not the ultimate. Other actions occur before spin.

Spin is the logical end game of the universe. There is no other way for the universe to save energy over a long period of time. Think of the billions of years that atoms spend not doing anything and then suddenly releasing energy. To do this they must have an internal spin mechanism for storing large amounts of energy. Thus, they must spin at the speed of light in order to store enough energy to power the universe. Thus, spin is a logical certainty because there are no other logical explanations which fit all the required criteria. Spin energy is the missing link that all the great scientists of the past have overlooked. Spin energy explains, gravity, light, mass, space and everything else in a logical and coherent order. These three spin states create a simple order and interlocking characteristics which are not present using the current theories.

End game?  I thought you said it was the start?

Spin is a product of process and acting forces.

Let me paint you a new picture to consider.

Imagine a void with a single stationary particle or stationary entity, there is no mechanism/force to give the particle any sort of motion.

We then a short length away introduce a second stationary particle or entity, the second particle will then have affect on the first particle/entity, the particles , entity attracted to each other but never allowed to touch, the particles/entities rotate around each other.

It always takes two to tango.





Logged
 

Offline Atkhenaken (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 156
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 5 times
Re: Does spin plus aether equal matter?
« Reply #52 on: 12/09/2016 16:09:37 »
Quote from: Thebox on 12/09/2016 15:46:23

End game?  I thought you said it was the start?

Spin is a product of process and acting forces.

Let me paint you a new picture to consider.

Imagine a void with a single stationary particle or stationary entity, there is no mechanism/force to give the particle any sort of motion.

We then a short length away introduce a second stationary particle or entity, the second particle will then have affect on the first particle/entity, the particles , entity attracted to each other but never allowed to touch, the particles/entities rotate around each other.

It always takes two to tango.

Why are they attracted to one-another? Your theory doesn't have a logical story line. One thing must always lead to another thing in a logical sequence of events and you can't use magic to fill in any voids or spaces. My theory is logical in all respects and all the parts fit together like a jigsaw puzzle with no empty spaces in between. Left spin - Right spin and Black hole attractor is all the universe is made of.
Logged
 



guest39538

  • Guest
Re: Does spin plus aether equal matter?
« Reply #53 on: 12/09/2016 16:22:45 »
Quote from: Atkhenaken on 12/09/2016 16:09:37
Quote from: Thebox on 12/09/2016 15:46:23

End game?  I thought you said it was the start?

Spin is a product of process and acting forces.

Let me paint you a new picture to consider.

Imagine a void with a single stationary particle or stationary entity, there is no mechanism/force to give the particle any sort of motion.

We then a short length away introduce a second stationary particle or entity, the second particle will then have affect on the first particle/entity, the particles , entity attracted to each other but never allowed to touch, the particles/entities rotate around each other.

It always takes two to tango.

Why are they attracted to one-another? Your theory doesn't have a logical story line. One thing must always lead to another thing in a logical sequence of events and you can't use magic to fill in any voids or spaces. My theory is logical in all respects and all the parts fit together like a jigsaw puzzle with no empty spaces in between. Left spin - Right spin and Black hole attractor is all the universe is made of.

I don't know everything my friend, all's I can say is a Law of motion, I am not sure if this is new,

Law-For any motion to occur there must be at least two ''participants''.

participant
pɑːˈtɪsɪp(ə)nt/Submit
noun
plural noun: participants
a person who takes part in something.

Edit - an entity that takes part in something

added -

edit -  a thing with distinct and independent existence that takes part in something

I am basing this assumption on that a single ''dot'' in a void has no mechanism for motion.

* void.jpg (11.73 kB, 899x601 - viewed 261 times.)
Logged
 

Offline Atkhenaken (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 156
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 5 times
Re: Does spin plus aether equal matter?
« Reply #54 on: 14/09/2016 16:55:05 »
Quote from: Thebox on 12/09/2016 16:22:45

I am basing this assumption on that a single ''dot'' in a void has no mechanism for motion.

You are assuming that the universe has a size limit but there are no size limits to the universe. The universe extents forever outwards and forever inwards. Thus, what you call a single dot may contain an entire universe within itself. The universe works like Photoshop, in that, there are invisible layers which can influence other layers depending on their instructions or intrinsic programming.
Logged
 

Offline GoC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 903
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 82 times
Re: Does spin plus aether equal matter?
« Reply #55 on: 15/09/2016 13:51:26 »
"You are assuming that the universe has a size limit but there are no size limits to the universe. The universe extents forever outwards and forever inwards. Thus, what you call a single dot may contain an entire universe within itself. The universe works like Photoshop, in that, there are invisible layers which can influence other layers depending on their instructions or intrinsic programming."

You have a good logical mind
Logged
 

Offline Alex Dullius Siqueira

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 277
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 10 times
Re: Does spin plus aether equal matter?
« Reply #56 on: 16/09/2016 02:06:57 »
Quote from: Atkhenaken on 12/09/2016 16:09:37
Quote from: Thebox on 12/09/2016 15:46:23

End game?  I thought you said it was the start?

Spin is a product of process and acting forces.

Let me paint you a new picture to consider.

Imagine a void with a single stationary particle or stationary entity, there is no mechanism/force to give the particle any sort of motion.

We then a short length away introduce a second stationary particle or entity, the second particle will then have affect on the first particle/entity, the particles , entity attracted to each other but never allowed to touch, the particles/entities rotate around each other.

It always takes two to tango.

Why are they attracted to one-another? Your theory doesn't have a logical story line. One thing must always lead to another thing in a logical sequence of events and you can't use magic to fill in any voids or spaces. My theory is logical in all respects and all the parts fit together like a jigsaw puzzle with no empty spaces in between. Left spin - Right spin and Black hole attractor is all the universe is made of.

 Perhaps the awnser lies into not try to consider the particles point of view, let's agree onto ignore such probabilities as charges...
 what doe we know? We have two particles only, we have a medium that was static "on it's whole" as long only one particle was presented, it theoricaly had a only center for pressure...
 Also the whole medium had a high density and temperature, probably the two factors gave born to the particle we introduce on the scenario, maybe not, the fact is, both are now interacting, not coexisting on the same place at the same time. The particle is occuping place on the medium, for this one could presume that the presence of the particle is pushing back the medium by its very existence, independantly of charges, it is physicaly there...

 The medium is static on its whole, homogeneous, but static doesn't mean that something is stoped, only stopped in comparison to something else, nothing can be static on its own existence... And we're assuming that the medium no matter its size is selecting the existence of the particle as a center, it is resonating on it's own due the presence of the particle, assume that the particle is static when in comparison to the medium, but when both are interacting, as on the example, the medium and particle add momentum and share everything, one need the other to it, so both of them aren't static in comparison to eachother anymore... At this point there is no spin, only existence, we can advance to accept such existence as causing dilatation, expansion and compression, from each point of view...

 Now one introduce a secund particle, one will seem to be "atracted" by the other, we will try to atest that is due charges, and maybe it is but lets ignore the particles properties for a moment and focus on the medium...
 As long as there was only one particle, the medium was focused only on one center of presure, it was condening the particle to act and be as a sphere, rotation of the particle itself was also probably null. At the moment the secunt particle came to exist, the whole medium, have just found another center of presure, as the original one, we wouldnt be able to see with nacked eyes, but there was waves focused on the first particles, the presence of the secund one, disrupted those waves by start to create its own fluctuations due its presence, and supposing that the particles where of the same type, they would create equal waves...

 What I eman is that like two bubbles of gas under a liquid, one that has not limits nor surfaces, only be, the gas bubble would remain static, adding a secund one, both of them would be recieving the whole density of the lake over themselves, but the lake, and the bubble are not the same think, so they can't share the same place, the lake is compressing the bubble constantly, the bubble will achieve a point that it will start to expand back towards the pressure it is recieving...
  If both particles come to be compressed homogenously nothing would happen, but the precense of two particles sharing the same lake, will force not the particles to be atracted to each other, but the waves they are producing would start to interact one with the other, the lake(medium) would inevitable set the path for both particles to move toward eachother, not the particles, the medium does not know what they are, simple that they are there, something is there ocupy space, the fluctuations of anything, this case particles, are interacting and unbalancing each other...
  Not the two particles cannot also fuse one with the other, by the same principle above, compression of the whole individualy over them, they will start to spin not because of charge, but caught one on the other fluctuation, see?

 Maybe is the case that the "whole medium" is trying once again and constantly to re-designate a static center of presure, but now the interaction between two particles that where set in motion by eachother presence and are now sppining, will onyl increase the sppining, a center of compression is no longer an option but the medium keeps trying, as more as it tries more speed the two particles will recieve from the medium, as faster the sppin occurs more certan that the two particles will not be able to fuse, not even stop, they are already sppining and nothing will change...

 At some point, since there is motion, the two particles will be interpreted as the unique center of compression, there gravity will be born, local gravity... The motion will increase along with the spining, a greather area of the medium will start to be affected by this motion, causing dilatation of it, lowering its own density, because the spining on this binary center is being able to push back, expand the own medium... Consider that outside the reach of the spin the density of the medium is returning to its normal, and the whole "galaxy" is being compressed by the universe from outside in, and the spining of the black hole is dealing with the density of the medium using it's own speed...

 Its not like a statical universe or aether, the universe outside the galaxy and inside are of the same type, are the same thing, but as long as the black hole is spining each time the whole universe try to force, to imposse its static center of compresion on the blackhole for this penetrating the edge of the galaxies, at this very moment it is caught on the acceleration, deliniating the galaxy shape, not as a statical one, but as a invisible eliptical, spiral, spheric shape, depending only on the type and power of the black hole at the center....

 Now of corse consider that a much bigger body, we call greath atractor, is also submiting the whole galaxies presented on it's own spiral disk to the same process and so own and own, maybe even beyond the great atractor, the same thing only increassing in scale, with the smalest as being the atom...

 All this for consider that the two particles are not atracting one towards the other due charges or properties of its own, but isntead being pushed agains the other by the medium for simple being presented there, between the medium, not coexisting on the same place, instead the medium compressing the particle with it's whole density, forcing it to keep it self as it it and not as energy, and also the interaction of many of those particles, disruption one another, proportional to their individual tyes, one being pushed against the other, but as for the individual pressure, never being able to join one with the other, always trying to joing different types of particles for being feeling different sorts of vibrations, not on themselves due charges, but vibrations on the medium...

 All this would only be possible in a scenario were everything is being oriented, the universe does not seems to be cause we can't feel the dilatations in our scale, seems to be a static place, but as for local the orientation we are folowing is the one of the greath atractor, so as for limit of our local gravity we gave the own earth as it is, as for system earth has the sun, as for the sun has another start until it reaches the blackhole at the center, and the black hole at the center the great atractor, so since the big bang, motion started and everything has a point of reference....

 If something cannot atract something else, it must be being pushed by something else...
Logged
 



Offline Atkhenaken (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 156
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 5 times
Re: Does spin plus aether equal matter?
« Reply #57 on: 16/09/2016 02:17:37 »
Quote from: Alex Siqueira on 16/09/2016 02:06:57

 If something cannot attract something else, it must be being pushed by something else...

The universe can only push, it can't pull. Pulling requires magic, and the universe doesn't do magic. The universe is pure logic. Only humans are illogical. Thus, if the universe doesn't make any sense its only because the humans that are thinking about it are illogical in their methods of interpretation of the universe's clues and messages.
Logged
 
The following users thanked this post: Alex Dullius Siqueira

Offline jerrygg38

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1033
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 34 times
Re: Does spin plus aether equal matter?
« Reply #58 on: 18/09/2016 23:24:39 »
Quote from: Atkhenaken on 02/09/2016 01:27:44
Quote from: Colin2B on 01/09/2016 23:05:28
Quote from: Atkhenaken on 01/09/2016 17:48:21
My theory is based on logic and observation.
Really?
Shaver plugs have 2 pins, 3 phase plugs have 4
for a sphere I can think of at least 9 movements, not counting movement through space
Don't understand the cogs bit, that's only 2 directions!

My theory requires a little common sense. The basic concept of positive, negative and neutral is all pervasive throughout nature and you can't discount its importance. Electricity is a positive negative and neutral force regardless of how many pins there are. Note - 99% of all plugs have 3 pins.
  To say that the universe is made up of three electrical entities, positive,negative, and neutral (bipolar) is excellent. Then you can get a huge assortment of various combinations or percentages of these three things. Then you want to add spin which is angular momentum. That is good. But you are lacking linear momentum and one more less obvious momentum is spherical momentum.  then you have  three things for each polarity giving you nine combinations. One you add various amounts of each thing you have an infinity of different things. The basic structure of the universe is very simple but once we add  these nine things in various combinations and percentages, you need the scientists to understand how things work. I agree that the basic sub structure of the universe is very simple but once you add all the sub structures together you get a 747 airplane which requires tremendous scientific and engineering ability to produce.
Logged
 

Offline William McC

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 158
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 4 times
Re: Does spin plus aether equal matter?
« Reply #59 on: 28/09/2016 01:19:44 »
Quote from: Atkhenaken on 30/08/2016 15:26:10
The universe is a simple place which can be explained in a very simple manner using spin as the basic unit of activity which the universe is based. I came to this conclusion by observing that galaxies spin, planets spin, suns spin and that atoms must spin also. The universe is divided into fractal dimensions, like a series of Russian dolls. These dimensions extend to infinity both outwards and inwards directions forever.
The universe is made of only one basic sub-atomic particle. This particle has 3 states - left spin (clockwise), right spin (anti-clockwise) and no spin (black-hole). The left and right spin could be interpreted as positive and negative, while the no spin particle could be interpreted as a black –hole or neutron.
These 3 forms make up space and matter. Space is made of alternate left and right spin aether particles which I would call ‘ethons’. The no spin ethon forms the centre of all matter and atoms (neutrons). Neutrons could be regarded as black holes which attract aether particles into rotation similar to how planets rotate around a sun. Aether particles spin at the speed of light.
The speed of light is a dimensional signature of the sub-atomic world. In the sub-atomic world, things happen very fast and don’t obey our laws of time and space. Light is a product of the sub-atomic world and travels at light speed because the ethons are naturally rotating at this speed and are thus conveyed like a conveyor belt. The ethons in space are not attached. They only engage one-another when light passes or they are united by a no spin ethon or neutron. When light passes through aether the ethons engage, as do the cogs in a clock or watch and cause the wave to move at the speed of light. Thus, light is two dimensional. It has both spin and wave energy.
The universe is energy rich. Aether particles spin at the speed of light. When 2 aether particles approach a large body like a sun, they are pushed together and stop spinning. This releases their energy. Thus – E=MC squared.
Using this concept the forces of the universe can be unified. Thus, spin becomes the common denominator which unites matter, light, electricity, gravity, weak and strong nuclear forces.

I would doubt spinning particles are causing much of anything, if they are even spinning. Science was wrapped up pretty much in the sixties both being finished as a perfected tool, and then being wrapped up by man made laws prohibiting its study in schools. 

Sincerely,

William McCormick
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 1.844 seconds with 71 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.