[Minefield (OP)]

24hr test

[chris]

I could see it all as a non-logged in anonymous user

[Colin2B]

I could see it all as a non-logged in anonymous user

Me too.
Wanted to check what the buttons eg 'edit poll' do without using a real post.

[Bored chemist]

I just like voicing my opinion.

[Colin2B]

I just like voicing my opinion.

Hopefully it will be more than just an opinion? Something objective perhaps?

[jeffreyH]

You cannot answer the question 'can you see this poll?' objectively. It is subjective in nature. The only response that makes sense is yes. Since you have to be able to see the poll in order to answer it. The methodology is therefore flawed.

[Minefield (OP)]

You cannot answer the question 'can you see this poll?' objectively. It is subjective in nature.

That's a whole can of worms on its own.

The only response that makes sense is yes. Since you have to be able to see the poll in order to answer it.

But isn't that objective - from observation?

The methodology is therefore flawed.

Noooooooooo, too much information 

[Bored chemist]

You cannot answer the question 'can you see this poll?' objectively.

I don't see it that way.

[jeffreyH]

In the case of at least one person answering no how do you interpret that?

[Minefield (OP)]

I don't see it that way.

I might see that as subjective.

In the case of at least one person answering no how do you interpret that?

I would be blind to their answer

[jeffreyH]

If you had a blind person who had access to a braille browser then their answer of no would be legitimate and subjective. They can feel but not see the poll. Without that information in an anonymous poll you could reject valid data points. Hence why I said the methodology is flawed.

[Minefield (OP)]

They can feel but not see the poll. .

Going all touchy-feely on us eh?

[jeffreyH]

See or feel what? You have now just manipulated the data out of existence.